Jeff Teague To Sign Bucks Offer Sheet

Baddy Chuck · Post #21 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:47 am

Kupchak9 wrote:12+ million dollars over a span of 4 years aren't assets?

Not really when you'd be over the cap anyways with a Sanders extension. And Kirilenko isn't getting 12 million for 4 years.....

jman23 · Post #22 » by **jman23** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:01 am

LikeABosh wrote:Teague/Ridnour
Mayo/Wolters
Delfino/Giannis
Ilyasova/Henson
Sanders/Zaza

It's aight

Ferry could decline to match the offer sheet and then get Jennings for cheap MLE type money

This team looks hideous on paper, wtf is wrong with Milwaukee? I'm not even a fan of theirs and this is pissing me off.... I just hate teams that are content with mediocrity.... Smh....

junot111 · Post #23 » by **junot111** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:04 am

Teague could have a Holiday-esque breakout year

LikeABosh · Post #24 » by **LikeABosh** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:11 am

jman23 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:Teague/Ridnour
Mayo/Wolters
Delfino/Giannis
Ilyasova/Henson
Sanders/Zaza

It's aight

Ferry could decline to match the offer sheet and then get Jennings for cheap MLE type money

This team looks hideous on paper, wtf is wrong with Milwaukee? I'm not even a fan of theirs and this is pissing me off.... I just hate teams that are content with mediocrity.... Smh....

They'll probably make the playoffs and that's proven to be Milwaukee's ultimate goal. It wouldn't hurt to set their sights a little higher

EricAnderson · Post #25 » by **EricAnderson** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:11 am

jman23 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:Teague/Ridnour
Mayo/Wolters
Delfino/Giannis
Ilyasova/Henson
Sanders/Zaza

It's aight

Ferry could decline to match the offer sheet and then get Jennings for cheap MLE type money

This team looks hideous on paper, wtf is wrong with Milwaukee? I'm not even a fan of theirs and this is pissing me off.... I just hate teams that are content with mediocrity.... Smh....

Its a mandate form the owner to do whatever it takes to make the 8th seed..its out of the gm's hands

Looking at that roster though its possible theyll be worse then mediocre thats a badly constructed team

Post #26 » by **Yuri Vaultin** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:47 am

I think you guys are really sleeping on Teague. He has got better every year.

LOOSH · Post #27 » by **LOOSH** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:54 am

This ends Jennings in Milwaukee ... no way they can go back to him after trying to grab another PG.

Mich3006 · Post #28 » by **Mich3006** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:59 am

LOOSH wrote:This ends Jennings in Milwaukee ... no way they can go back to him after trying to grab another PG.

Jennings will be fine if the Hawks would take on him on 4y/ 36 (I guess...) contract - Atl should go for Jennings not Ellis btw!!
Bucks do the right with Teague

GswStorm3 · Post #29 » by **GswStorm3** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:00 am

LOOSH wrote:This ends Jennings in Milwaukee ... no way they can go back to him after trying to grab another PG.

Sure they can. Jennings doesn't have much leverage as a RFA.

BTW I think this offer sheet gets matched.

dorkestra · Post #30 » by **dorkestra** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:09 am

Call me crazy, but I think this Bucks team will overachieve this year and prove most people here wrong. I like the balance of their team.

orlandomanic · Post #31 » by **orlandomanic** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:15 am

Tell me if im wrong about this, but doesn't this give a big "screw you" to Jennings financially.

the Hawks wouldn't match the Bucks offer for Teague, this would leave Jennings with no home. Since Dallas is already set with their PGs, essentially the only bidder left is the Hawks, so couldn't the Hawks get Jennings now dirt cheap. like $4 million a year on a short term contract?

Pattycakes · Post #32 » by **Pattycakes** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:18 am

dorkestra wrote:Call me crazy, but I think this Bucks team will overachieve this year and prove most people here wrong. I like the balance of their team.

I agree. In all respect, I think people should "stfu" and see what this Bucks team has in store. That roster looks like a bunch of guys who could overachieve and surprise a lot of people and in a typically weak ass Eastern Conference, I don't see all the hate. Teague>decent, Mayo=same, Delfino=give or take, same with Iyllasova, Sanders=one of the best and underrated. but Ridnour and Henson off the bench is gonna be what potentially gives some opponents headaches. Define 6/7 seed. Hope Mayo goes for 20 ppg.

DavidSterned · Post #33 » by **DavidSterned** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:28 am

Pattycakes wrote:
dorkestra wrote:Call me crazy, but I think this Bucks team will overachieve this year and prove most people here wrong. I like the balance of their team.

I agree. In all respect, I think people should "stfu" and see what this Bucks team has in store. That roster looks like a bunch of guys who could overachieve and surprise a lot of people and in a typically weak ass Eastern Conference, I don't see all the hate. Teague>decent, Mayo=same, Delfino=give or take, same with Iyllasova, Sanders=one of the best and underrated. but Ridnour and Henson off the bench is gonna be what potentially gives some opponents headaches. Define 6/7 seed. Hope Mayo goes for 20 ppg.

Their ceiling for the foreseeable future is a 6th or 7th seed. What's the point?

Post #34 » by **ATL Boy** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:40 am

Hawks will probably match

ATLHawksfan21 · Post #35 » by **ATLHawksfan21** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:06 pm

ATL Boy wrote:Hawks will probably match

I don't see Ferry matching this one. Too many years and too many dollars when we just picked up Schroeder in the draft. I would rather sign Jennings on a 2 year deal and give Schroeder time to develop than invest 32 million in Teague over 4 years.

Post #36 » by **ATL Boy** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:21 pm

ATLHawksfan21 wrote:
ATL Boy wrote:Hawks will probably match

I don't see Ferry matching this one. Too many years and too many dollars when we just picked up Schroeder in the draft. I would rather sign Jennings on a 2 year deal and give Schroeder time to develop than invest 32 million in Teague over 4 years.

Who knows what Ferry's thinking but if nothing else if Schroder's ready in 2 years Teague can be an excellent trade chip. I really don't want Jennings mentoring Schroder.

Total_Package · Post #37 » by **Total_Package** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 1:34 pm

LOL @ Bucks. They should seriously just move them to Vegas.

ATLHawksfan21 · Post #38 » by **ATLHawksfan21** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:11 pm

ATL Boy wrote:
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:
ATL Boy wrote:Hawks will probably match

I don't see Ferry matching this one. Too many years and too many dollars when we just picked up Schroeder in the draft. I would rather sign Jennings on a 2 year deal and give Schroeder time to develop than invest 32 million in Teague over 4 years.

Who knows what Ferry's thinking but if nothing else if Schroder's ready in 2 years Teague can be an excellent trade chip. I really don't want Jennings mentoring Schroder.

Jennings is easily the better fit for the Hawks in my opinion. I think he can be had for less than $8 million per year also since we are the only team left that has a need at PG and the cap space for him. I think Jennings would improve big time on the Hawks. He would be surrounded by above average shooters at every position and he would have all kinds of room to work. I could see him averaging close to 10 assists a game.

Jordan45822 · Post #39 » by **Jordan45822** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:13 pm

AlexKennedyNBA
If ATL doesn't match MIL's offer to Jeff Teague, Mo Williams is possible replacement. They expressed interest in Mo earlier in free agency.

-

NekiEcko · Post #40 » by **NekiEcko** » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:19 pm

They are going to make Schroder the starting PG if Teague goes to the Bucks. Remember, when Tony Parker came into the league, he started 70 games, he did struggle but he learned alot and it help him become the player that he is today.