ImageImageImageImageImage

Bickford doesn't sign, Brentz($700k) and Tellez($850k) do

Moderator: JaysRule15

dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Bickford doesn't sign, Brentz($700k) and Tellez($850k) do 

Post#1 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:37 pm

Gregor Chisholm ‏@gregorMLB 3m
Anthopoulos does not expect to sign first rounder Phil Bickford prior to tomorrow's deadline. #BlueJays



Gregor Chisholm ‏@gregorMLB 34s
In the first three rounds, clubs must offer at least 40% of slot value in order to receive compensation.Anthopoulos expects a pick next year

With the comp pick it's not a disaster, but to have this happen twice in three years suggests someone isn't doing proper due digilence. It's not like the slot money can be used elsewhere in this case, and the Jays lose a year in development of a potential top prospect.

So far, all but two first rounders in the past draft have signed.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
galacticos2
Banned User
Posts: 619
And1: 71
Joined: May 29, 2013

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#2 » by galacticos2 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:39 pm

Do GM's speak to the prospects before hand when they scout them, do they not give an indication if they would sign with them or no. Or is this a money issue?
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 69,970
And1: 33,835
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#3 » by Fairview4Life » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:42 pm

His agent knows how much the Jays have to spend and wants his client to get it instead of Tellez and...other guy or whoever the late round signings we've been saving money for are.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#4 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:49 pm

im Callis ‏@jimcallisBA 10s
Still not convinced #BlueJays definitely won't sign Bickford. We'll see. #mlbdraft


Gregor Chisholm ‏@gregorMLB 1m
AA: "It looks as though we won't be signing him. Anything can change but ... right now we probably won't have a deal in place."
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#5 » by BigLeagueChew » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:51 pm

I hate the MLB draft compared to other sports.
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,326
And1: 13,020
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#6 » by SharoneWright » Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:59 pm

It's the right play by AA. Get it out in public you don't expect to sign him and are prepared to accept that reality. It might make Bickford's people second guess a little and come back to AA with a lower number.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#7 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm

John Lott ‏@LottOnBaseball 6m
Anthopoulos says #BlueJays unlikely to sign top draft pick Bickford. Says don't jump to conclusions about reasons, but won't give reasons.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#8 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:10 pm

SharoneWright wrote:It's the right play by AA. Get it out in public you don't expect to sign him and are prepared to accept that reality. It might make Bickford's people second guess a little and come back to AA with a lower number.


Even better, signed one or both of the other two we're after and tell Bickford it's impossible to get more.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 647
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#9 » by Graham's Cracker » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:13 pm

Well, that's dissapointing. I wonder if Bickford's demands changed once he saw how much money the Jays had saved?
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#10 » by -MetA4- » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:15 pm

Graham's Cracker wrote:Well, that's dissapointing. I wonder if Bickford's demands changed once he saw how much money the Jays had saved?


No, man. No team is going to "fall" for this.
User avatar
Garmfay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,795
And1: 542
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Location: LeBronto
     

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#11 » by Garmfay » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:24 pm

Good. We get the 10th pick in next years stacked class
Image
Credit to Turbo_Zone
"The Lion does not concern himself with the opinion of the sheep"
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#12 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:27 pm

Graham's Cracker wrote:Well, that's dissapointing. I wonder if Bickford's demands changed once he saw how much money the Jays had saved?



AA said not to speculate on the reasons Bickford won't sign, but then didn't elaborate on his reasons. I can't think of a reason other than Benjamins... It's not like he's a Rhodes scholar.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
distracted
Veteran
Posts: 2,809
And1: 56
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
Location: Section 318

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#13 » by distracted » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:04 pm

dagger wrote:Even better, signed one or both of the other two we're after and tell Bickford it's impossible to get more.


I thought the point was we need to sign Bickford for a lower amount to be able to sign the other two?
User avatar
distracted
Veteran
Posts: 2,809
And1: 56
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
Location: Section 318

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#14 » by distracted » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:07 pm

Also, MLB should just scrap the draft and do one huge amateur free agency where you have a defined amount of pool money each year. Hard capped based on your standings the prior year, though you can trade the pool money you have once the season is over and the pools are set (prior to season end you can trade any amount up to first place pool money).

Any bonus < 100K doesn't count towards your pool, for filling out rosters.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#15 » by -MetA4- » Thu Jul 11, 2013 5:16 pm

distracted wrote:I thought the point was we need to sign Bickford for a lower amount to be able to sign the other two?


No. Even with Bickford at slot we could offer a little over a million each for both Brentz and Tellez.
vaff87
RealGM
Posts: 23,926
And1: 70,941
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#16 » by vaff87 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:14 pm

Given the mixed reviews on this guy, I certainly don't see it as the end of the world.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,437
And1: 17,971
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#17 » by Schad » Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:38 pm

Somewhat odd.
Image
**** your asterisk.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#18 » by dagger » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:41 pm

Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA 13m
That would be $3,516,500 @jcrmarlinsbeat: Source: #Marlins and sixth overall pick Colin Moran have agreed to terms for slot bonus.


Jays are the only team with an unsigned first.

By the way, how good is the 2014 draft? If it looks really good, I'm Machievallian enough to be persuaded AA might be happy with two firsts in that draft. If I'm too cynical, what other explanation for missing out on our first two years out of the last three?
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 18,940
And1: 11,190
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#19 » by tecumseh18 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:50 pm

dagger wrote:
Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA 13m
That would be $3,516,500 @jcrmarlinsbeat: Source: #Marlins and sixth overall pick Colin Moran have agreed to terms for slot bonus.


Jays are the only team with an unsigned first.

By the way, how good is the 2014 draft? If it looks really good, I'm Machievallian enough to be persuaded AA might be happy with two firsts in that draft. If I'm too cynical, what other explanation for missing out on our first two years out of the last three?


Yeah, it's not a disaster. Except that this whole year has been a disaster with our starting pitching, and [edit: many of the highly-touted] SP prospects in the minors have been struggling. For a Toronto sports fan, it's hard to not use this as yet another opportunity to act out our unique brand of hang-dog defeatism.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: AA: Bickford isn't going to sign 

Post#20 » by -MetA4- » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:56 pm

dagger wrote:By the way, how good is the 2014 draft? If it looks really good, I'm Machievallian enough to be persuaded AA might be happy with two firsts in that draft. If I'm too cynical, what other explanation for missing out on our first two years out of the last three?


The 2014 draft is looking stronger than this year's draft.

I dont think this was some super-secret ploy to defer this pick to next year's stronger draft class. I believe this ultimately falls on the Jays' now clear-cut hardass "negotiation" process in which they hope a kid will come to his senses and take the money. I think they wanted to sign Bickford and were banking on him realizing that the Jays' offer was wise to take. At the same time; it appears clear that the Jays dont seem to care about not getting a deal done - they wont budge.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays