Image ImageImage Image

WT- Nate unlikely to be back (WAIT! + instagram pic pg 81!)

Moderators: HomoSapien, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper

User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,059
And1: 4,481
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1141 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:54 pm

coldfish wrote:
bulls_13 wrote:Hypothetically, if this drags out and Nate doesn't get other offers and ends up signing with the Bulls for the minimum, I'd be a bit concerned that he would be a distraction over the course of the season. He plays with such a chip on his shoulder and I can only imagine what a bitter Nate would start doing on/off the court.


Why would Nate be bitter at Chicago if the Bulls were the only team that made him an offer? He might be even more aggressive in trying to punish other teams though. I doubt he would be an off court issue at all. Seems to be a good locker room guy and get along with everyone on the team.



Yeah - I don't remember ever hearing anything about Nate being a distraction off the court. For all his bravado and immaturity on the court - I don't think he's ever caused problems off it.

My only concern is playing time - and that even if the money is close he might choose to go elsewhere because of it.

The only real advantage we have right now is if Nate stays here we'll have his Early-Bird rights.
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
User avatar
bulls_13
Junior
Posts: 464
And1: 106
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1142 » by bulls_13 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:57 pm

coldfish wrote:
bulls_13 wrote:Hypothetically, if this drags out and Nate doesn't get other offers and ends up signing with the Bulls for the minimum, I'd be a bit concerned that he would be a distraction over the course of the season. He plays with such a chip on his shoulder and I can only imagine what a bitter Nate would start doing on/off the court.


Why would Nate be bitter at Chicago if the Bulls were the only team that made him an offer? He might be even more aggressive in trying to punish other teams though. I doubt he would be an off court issue at all. Seems to be a good locker room guy and get along with everyone on the team.


True, I don't think he'd be bitter AT Chicago, but could see him going rouge in trying to prove himself, play out of the system, etc. Can picture Thibs face now. ;)
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,799
And1: 2,937
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1143 » by Ben » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:11 pm

bulls_13 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
bulls_13 wrote:Hypothetically, if this drags out and Nate doesn't get other offers and ends up signing with the Bulls for the minimum, I'd be a bit concerned that he would be a distraction over the course of the season. He plays with such a chip on his shoulder and I can only imagine what a bitter Nate would start doing on/off the court.


Why would Nate be bitter at Chicago if the Bulls were the only team that made him an offer? He might be even more aggressive in trying to punish other teams though. I doubt he would be an off court issue at all. Seems to be a good locker room guy and get along with everyone on the team.


True, I don't think he'd be bitter AT Chicago, but could see him going rouge in trying to prove himself, play out of the system, etc. Can picture Thibs face now. ;)


I would love to see Nate go rouge. Or even just get a little red in the face.
D_GoLow
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,068
And1: 1,245
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
Location: Charlottesville
Contact:
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1144 » by D_GoLow » Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:14 pm

Sports Whispers ‏@SportsWhispers 26m
Nate Robinson and Mo Williams are struggling to get a (good) contract offer thus far in free agency.


The longer he waits, the more I like our chances. Feel bad for Nate, the guy deserves to get paid.
This is not a moment, it's a movement
User avatar
Mr Funk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,279
And1: 5,379
Joined: Jul 18, 2012
Location: Toronto

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1145 » by Mr Funk » Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:53 pm

Scratch crappy ass Toronto off the list:

WT:

The Portland Trail Blazers, Oklahoma City Thunder and Miami Heat had pursued Buycks as a potential third-string point guard, but he ultimately couldn’t pass up the opportunity to back up Kyle Lowry on the Raptors. For the Raptors, Buycks’ defense and playmaking served as enticing factors to give him a chance.

The Oklahoman first reported that Buycks had agreed to be the Raptors’ backup point guard
Image
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,799
And1: 2,937
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1146 » by Ben » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:11 pm

Mr Funk wrote:Scratch crappy ass Toronto off the list:

WT:

The Portland Trail Blazers, Oklahoma City Thunder and Miami Heat had pursued Buycks as a potential third-string point guard, but he ultimately couldn’t pass up the opportunity to back up Kyle Lowry on the Raptors. For the Raptors, Buycks’ defense and playmaking served as enticing factors to give him a chance.

The Oklahoman first reported that Buycks had agreed to be the Raptors’ backup point guard


Good find. The fact that they wanted defense and playmaking makes it all the more understandable that they weren't looking for Nate. And if a team can only offer Nate 3rd string PG duties, he might be just as willing to stay with us (unless the other team offers him considerably more, which seems unlikely for anyone who just wants a 3rd string PG).

On Twitter, I see Nate's name mentioned often alongside the Lakers. It's only from Laker fans wishing to get him, not from credible reports linking them. And the Lakers already have Blake at $4 million, so Nate would be 3rd string there as well. I wonder whether he would take a vet minimum offer from them just to have the chance to charm LA?

All of us have to hope that he won't get offered a role on Miami, or that if offered he wouldn't take it.
jumpmanjay
Analyst
Posts: 3,435
And1: 703
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1147 » by jumpmanjay » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:15 pm

Ben wrote:
Mr Funk wrote:Scratch crappy ass Toronto off the list:

WT:

The Portland Trail Blazers, Oklahoma City Thunder and Miami Heat had pursued Buycks as a potential third-string point guard, but he ultimately couldn’t pass up the opportunity to back up Kyle Lowry on the Raptors. For the Raptors, Buycks’ defense and playmaking served as enticing factors to give him a chance.

The Oklahoman first reported that Buycks had agreed to be the Raptors’ backup point guard


Good find. The fact that they wanted defense and playmaking makes it all the more understandable that they weren't looking for Nate. And if a team can only offer Nate 3rd string PG duties, he might be just as willing to stay with us (unless the other team offers him considerably more, which seems unlikely for anyone who just wants a 3rd string PG).

On Twitter, I see Nate's name mentioned often alongside the Lakers. It's only from Laker fans wishing to get him, not from credible reports linking them. And the Lakers already have Blake at $4 million, so Nate would be 3rd string there as well. I wonder whether he would take a vet minimum offer from them just to have the chance to charm LA?

All of us have to hope that he won't get offered a role on Miami, or that if offered he wouldn't take it.

didn't the lakers also re-sign jordan farmar? or was that only a rumor?
User avatar
pylb
General Manager
Posts: 8,190
And1: 3,695
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
Location: Paris
 

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1148 » by pylb » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:16 pm

I really don't see why Miami would need him. They don't need shot creation. Hinrich might even be a better fit for them.
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,799
And1: 2,937
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1149 » by Ben » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:28 pm

jumpmanjay wrote:
Ben wrote:
Mr Funk wrote:Scratch crappy ass Toronto off the list:

WT:



Good find. The fact that they wanted defense and playmaking makes it all the more understandable that they weren't looking for Nate. And if a team can only offer Nate 3rd string PG duties, he might be just as willing to stay with us (unless the other team offers him considerably more, which seems unlikely for anyone who just wants a 3rd string PG).

On Twitter, I see Nate's name mentioned often alongside the Lakers. It's only from Laker fans wishing to get him, not from credible reports linking them. And the Lakers already have Blake at $4 million, so Nate would be 3rd string there as well. I wonder whether he would take a vet minimum offer from them just to have the chance to charm LA?

All of us have to hope that he won't get offered a role on Miami, or that if offered he wouldn't take it.

didn't the lakers also re-sign jordan farmar? or was that only a rumor?


Forgot about that-- yeah, LAL should be off the list.

pylb wrote:I really don't see why Miami would need him. They don't need shot creation. Hinrich might even be a better fit for them.


But in the 2nd unit they do, don't they?
User avatar
JackFinn
RealGM
Posts: 15,121
And1: 1,605
Joined: Oct 08, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1150 » by JackFinn » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:32 pm

I was afraid the Lakers would go after Nate. Things are looking up. We just need to see the Teague/Monta/Jennings dominoes fall.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,813
And1: 37,195
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1151 » by DuckIII » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:35 pm

Its absolutely nuts that no one has picked him up yet after the season he had last year.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,439
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1152 » by kyrv » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:36 pm

bulls_13 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
bulls_13 wrote:Hypothetically, if this drags out and Nate doesn't get other offers and ends up signing with the Bulls for the minimum, I'd be a bit concerned that he would be a distraction over the course of the season. He plays with such a chip on his shoulder and I can only imagine what a bitter Nate would start doing on/off the court.


Why would Nate be bitter at Chicago if the Bulls were the only team that made him an offer? He might be even more aggressive in trying to punish other teams though. I doubt he would be an off court issue at all. Seems to be a good locker room guy and get along with everyone on the team.


True, I don't think he'd be bitter AT Chicago, but could see him going rouge in trying to prove himself, play out of the system, etc. Can picture Thibs face now. ;)


Help Nate go rouge, which best suits him?

Image


Also I can't imagine Nate ever taking shots out of the system.

:o


Edit - Ben beat me to it.


DuckIII wrote:Its absolutely nuts that no one has picked him up yet after the season he had last year.


It's insane. I can't believe it.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,799
And1: 2,937
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1153 » by Ben » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:52 pm

kyrv wrote:Help Nate go rouge, which best suits him?

Image

Edit - Ben beat me to it.



You still raise a very good question. Many of those shades fit Nate in one way or another. Adorable, for some. Fabulous, Amusing... Audac(ious).

For me, it's probably Desirable. As a FA, you understand.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,609
And1: 10,079
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1154 » by League Circles » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:56 pm

Looks like the greatest athlete in the history of the world will likely be returning to the Bulls on a minimum contract. Yeah, that's how we roll.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
jumpmanjay
Analyst
Posts: 3,435
And1: 703
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1155 » by jumpmanjay » Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:56 pm

Ben wrote:
kyrv wrote:Help Nate go rouge, which best suits him?

Image

Edit - Ben beat me to it.



You still raise a very good question. Many of those shades fit Nate in one way or another. Adorable, for some. Fabulous, Amusing... Audac(ious).

For me, it's probably Desirable. As a FA, you understand.

...Audace matches his busted lip...
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1156 » by Ralphb07 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:13 pm

I just don't get it, he may still end up getting a MMLE offer, but I am shocked that he has not been swooped up yet.
mostek
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 224
Joined: Jul 07, 2013

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1157 » by mostek » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:13 pm

Not many minimum deals get done, until most of the money has dried up, except ring chasers, and guys coming off amnesty. It should not be a surprise that Nate has not found a deal, yet. I guess nick Young took one, but got to go home, and should get plenty of playing time, at least unto Kobe get back. There are 30 GMs in the league, so at least one will probably eventually get to Nate.

Utah maybe?

Bill Oram: Once/if that happens, Jazz will then want a PG for vet minimum. John Lucas remains a likely option. Twitter @tribjazz
bad knees
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,836
And1: 2,805
Joined: Jul 09, 2009

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1158 » by bad knees » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:24 pm

Oram, a Jazz beat writer (pun intended), says that the Jazz have about $5M in cap space left, and that they are looking to use it to take on a contract and a pick. If they do that, and the contract received is not a PG, they likely will sign JLIII at the vet min. If the contract they receive is a PG, according to Oram the Jazz probably will not sign another PG.
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,298
And1: 15,544
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1159 » by DASMACKDOWN » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:32 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:I just don't get it, he may still end up getting a MMLE offer, but I am shocked that he has not been swooped up yet.


Based on the previous offseason, I guess we shouldn't be surprised. We got Nate late in free agency as well for the min.

When you look back at it, its not unusual. Guys like Earl Boykins comes to mind.
basghetti80
Pro Prospect
Posts: 926
And1: 49
Joined: Jun 05, 2001

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back 

Post#1160 » by basghetti80 » Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:38 pm

If the Jazz have 5 mil and want a contract and need a PG who not salary dump Kirk over there and then just MMLE to sign Nate?

Return to Chicago Bulls