JackFinn wrote:Gar Paxdorf wrote:I must have missed it - has it indeed been rumored/reported that we offered him the 120%?
There was a report we offered him the minimum - 
blumeany wrote:Well, there's this:
 Chicago contacted Nate Robinson and offered the minimum, per a source. He's searching for a more lucrative multi-year deal after big season.
Via Alex Kennedy/Hoopsworld
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 
Sure, there's a possibility we're nickel/diming him and only offering 100%, but I doubt it
 
FWIW, I think there is a substantial chance we haven't offered him the 20% raise, or any raise for that matter.  As I understand the CBA, if he's a minimum player, we only pay the 884k (league pays the rest), plus the taxes on that 884k, which I'm assuming to be the second tier of LT at $1.75 on the dollar.  Thus, we'd pay 884k+1.75*884 = 2.43 million.
With the 20% raise, he's not longer a minimum player, and the league doesn't pay any of his salary, plus we pay tax on the whole thing.  So we pay 1.518 mil + 1.75* 1.518 mil = 4.17 mil.
So in order for Nate to get 1.518 mil (20% raise over the minimum for a player in his 8th year - Nate was in his 8th year this past season) instead of 1.272 million (minimum for a 9th year player) this coming season, the Bulls have to spend almost 1.8 million more.  So it's only about 225k to Nate, but 1.8 million to the Bulls.