AAU Teammate wrote:Why does Nate Robinson get to be 'good at one thing' but Hinrich and Teague dont get to be good at certain things?
Who said that? I just said Nate is a better player than both of them.
They're all heavily flawed in certain areas, but have their strengths. The guy the highest lows would be Hinrich - and we're talking about bench players that need to stem the tide for Derrick when he's on the bench.
Hinrich is going to be part of what (I hope) is a return to elite-defense bench mobbin. When Derrick sits we need to stabilize. Great defense can be there every night even when shots arent falling.
Nate's not about stabilize. He's about shoot you into a game or shoot you out. We needed that last year, but our O isnt going to be desperate this year.
Teague
Hinrich
Dunleavy
Gibson
Nazr
That doesn't strike me as a bench that doesn't need any offense.














