ImageImageImage

Speaking of Jennings

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#21 » by Piston Pete » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:23 pm

DetroitPistons wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


Thank you. Jennings is terrible. BTW, Im just curious, what do Bucks fans expect in return if a S&T happened with Jennings?


Honestly....probably just expirings and a pick or 2nds... :lol:
User avatar
dVs33
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 10,186
And1: 1,874
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Oz
   

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#22 » by dVs33 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:16 pm

Bucksmaniac wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
retrolenny wrote:
I would hate to have Jennings and his poor attitude but if it happens, it is my hope it would be a package involving Stuck & JJ so we can sign Siva and then trading Singler for a late 2014 1st.


Getting rid of Stuckey and especially Jerebko while getting back Jennings would be a huge win for Dumars.

Jennings / Billups / Bynum
Knight / KCP

That's a solid guard rotation


Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


CV had a 50+ point game and Stuckey had a 40+ point game - Who gives a ****?

Jennings is a no defense chucker with a huge ego and attitude that hasn't achieved anything to justify it.
I want nothing to do with him.
Brt19
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,261
And1: 424
Joined: Jun 24, 2011
Location: Turkey
 

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#23 » by Brt19 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:19 pm

If this happens, him and Smith will give me cancer but Knight gives me heart problems. I'm okay with either way.
User avatar
King Bugs
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,610
And1: 326
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
   

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#24 » by King Bugs » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:44 pm

I feel sick... Jennings?

I don't want anymore ex-Milwaukee garbage on our team.
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#25 » by Liqourish » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:12 pm

Don't believe it.
User avatar
Rodya
Starter
Posts: 2,203
And1: 16
Joined: Oct 23, 2005
Location: AKA: Russian Lightning

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#26 » by Rodya » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:25 pm

dVs33 wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
Getting rid of Stuckey and especially Jerebko while getting back Jennings would be a huge win for Dumars.

Jennings / Billups / Bynum
Knight / KCP

That's a solid guard rotation


Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


CV had a 50+ point game and Stuckey had a 40+ point game - Who gives a ****?

Jennings is a no defense chucker with a huge ego and attitude that hasn't achieved anything to justify it.
I want nothing to do with him.


That's the point he was making.
User avatar
The_Irony
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,298
And1: 411
Joined: Nov 28, 2002
Location: Westcoast

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#27 » by The_Irony » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:33 pm

dVs33 wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
Getting rid of Stuckey and especially Jerebko while getting back Jennings would be a huge win for Dumars.

Jennings / Billups / Bynum
Knight / KCP

That's a solid guard rotation


Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


CV had a 50+ point game and Stuckey had a 40+ point game - Who gives a ****?

Jennings is a no defense chucker with a huge ego and attitude that hasn't achieved anything to justify it.
I want nothing to do with him.


That was his point :lol:
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#28 » by DBC10 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:16 pm

dVs33 wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:
sfballa13 wrote:
Getting rid of Stuckey and especially Jerebko while getting back Jennings would be a huge win for Dumars.

Jennings / Billups / Bynum
Knight / KCP

That's a solid guard rotation


Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


CV had a 50+ point game and Stuckey had a 40+ point game - Who gives a ****?

Jennings is a no defense chucker with a huge ego and attitude that hasn't achieved anything to justify it.
I want nothing to do with him.
WHOOOOOOOSH

Seriously, I don't think I know a legitimate Bucks fan that actually likes Jennings or Monta. One of the reasons why I don't want either of them at all.
BillCartwrightDaMan
Senior
Posts: 660
And1: 23
Joined: Jun 07, 2005

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#29 » by BillCartwrightDaMan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:28 pm

Gery Woelfel of The Journal Times wrote on Monday that scuttlebutt out of Las Vegas claimed the Milwaukee Bucks and Detroit Pistons were discussing the potential of a sign-and-trade for Brandon Jennings.

While that may be true, a deal is unlikely as Chauncey Billups has returned to the Pistons and he plans to be the starting point guard. The Pistons may be willing to send Rodney Stuckey to Milwaukee, however they probably don't want to deal Brandon Knight, who the Bucks want.

Jennings' options are limited since he reportedly prefers to leave the Bucks. Jennings may decide to accept his $4.53 million qualifying offer which would force him to play at last part of the season in Milwaukee, however he would then be an unrestricted free agent in 2014.

There was a report last weekend that Detroit has eyes for Rajon Rondo, but the Celtics won't even think about sending him to the Pistons if they don't include Andre Drummond and that's not happening.


-By Nick Borges | ESPN.com
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,868
And1: 3,460
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#30 » by theBigLip » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:43 pm

Unfortunately, we don't know what is true, and obviously, the reporters don't either.

That being said, if Joe is talking with the Bucks about Jennings (or any team about any player), that's all good. Anytime teams are looking to trade, or sign and trade, I want our name in there. Maybe Boston would take Jennings, and we could get Rondo, so we could work a three way. Or Jennings could find a home anywhere, and we could help facilitate and somehow get another piece.

I agree with most of the comments that Jennings is not a good fit on our team, but that shouldn't stop Joe from talking to the Bucks.
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,061
And1: 952
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#31 » by mlloyd10 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:26 pm

DetroitPistons wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


Thank you. Jennings is terrible. BTW, Im just curious, what do Bucks fans expect in return if a S&T happened with Jennings?


One of your beat writers reported that the deal being discussed is Jennings/Udoh for Stuckey/Knight.
User avatar
mercury
Head Coach
Posts: 6,407
And1: 679
Joined: Jul 22, 2003

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#32 » by mercury » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:33 pm

Joe denied this rumor... said only thing him & Hammond talked about was "their dogs"
Jodi
Banned User
Posts: 4,520
And1: 52
Joined: Jul 23, 2011

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#33 » by Jodi » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:49 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:
DetroitPistons wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


Thank you. Jennings is terrible. BTW, Im just curious, what do Bucks fans expect in return if a S&T happened with Jennings?


One of your beat writers reported that the deal being discussed is Jennings/Udoh for Stuckey/Knight.

Maybe Stuckey, but no way are we trading Knight...
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#34 » by Liqourish » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:43 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:
DetroitPistons wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


Thank you. Jennings is terrible. BTW, Im just curious, what do Bucks fans expect in return if a S&T happened with Jennings?


One of your beat writers reported that the deal being discussed is Jennings/Udoh for Stuckey/Knight.


If our beat writers are claiming that the deal is being discussed, you can bet everything you own, that Dumars and Hammond haven't discussed it.
JD43320
Veteran
Posts: 2,555
And1: 786
Joined: Jun 27, 2009

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#35 » by JD43320 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:49 pm

mercury wrote:Joe denied this rumor... said only thing him & Hammond talked about was "their dogs"


So they did talk about Stuckey and Jennings.
User avatar
dVs33
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 10,186
And1: 1,874
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Oz
   

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#36 » by dVs33 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:52 pm

The_Irony wrote:
dVs33 wrote:
Bucksmaniac wrote:
Bucks fan here, you must not have watched Jennings at all in his first four years in the league, or else just watched his 55 point game.


CV had a 50+ point game and Stuckey had a 40+ point game - Who gives a ****?

Jennings is a no defense chucker with a huge ego and attitude that hasn't achieved anything to justify it.
I want nothing to do with him.



That was his point :lol:


hahaha :oops:
triplet1984
General Manager
Posts: 8,356
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 18, 2006

Re: Speaking of Jennings 

Post#37 » by triplet1984 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:33 pm

^ lol. But seriously i hate Jennings. Exactly the kind of player we don't need. We need someone who can run an offense.

Return to Detroit Pistons