Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Johnson
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,430
- And1: 5,736
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
-
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
If we QO him, and he accepts, is that a one time thing? Or in the next offseason, can we QO him again? Essentially keeping him around on one year contracts until we get a draft pick out of him?
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,745
- And1: 248
- Joined: Jul 07, 2010
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
trading him seems foolish? you don't know what the deal is/could be
no one on this team is untradeable
no one on this team is untradeable
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,237
- And1: 66
- Joined: Oct 27, 2009
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
akakalakin wrote:trading him seems foolish? you don't know what the deal is/could be
no one on this team is untradeable
But we do. It'd be less than the Grienke deal which was a top 50 prospect and the clubs 7th and 14th ranked prospects, which means I'd rather Johnson.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,237
- And1: 66
- Joined: Oct 27, 2009
Re: Reports: Blue Jays aren't interested in trading Josh Joh
Parataxis wrote:If we QO him, and he accepts, is that a one time thing? Or in the next offseason, can we QO him again? Essentially keeping him around on one year contracts until we get a draft pick out of him?
Since he can accept or decline the QO, we can continue to do it until he declines and signs with another team.
So yes, we can do 1 year contracts until he is either worth too little or enough to decline.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick