Image

Jennings for Granger

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
Jake0890
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 5,983
And1: 807
Joined: Jul 12, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
   

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#41 » by Jake0890 » Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:18 am

I think it's time for a George Hill thread.
216pacers
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#42 » by 216pacers » Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:08 pm

i said to trade granger 2 years ago, but not for one of the biggest ballhogs.
xBulletproof
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,846
And1: 5,871
Joined: May 26, 2013
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#43 » by xBulletproof » Sun Jul 28, 2013 12:18 pm

I ripped Brandon Jennings here pretty hard, and some defended him, but there's a reason why he's still a free agent. On top of that, I saw this, and I thought of this thread.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnHndbNPYi0[/youtube]
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#44 » by Boneman2 » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:10 pm

^^^ Those numbers are predicated from Brandon trying to be a number one scoring option. Let me be clear, if BJ played here he would not play the same style because Lance, Paul, David, Roy, etc. would not allow it. This could lead to chemistry issues so it ultimately might not be worth the risk, even though he is a better pg.

At this point the only way to upgrade the 1 is to package Hill/Stephenson/ *Fut 1st for Rondo. Any other pg. available now is a lateral move at best.

* (2016 1st would be contingent on RR resigning.) In this scenario, two seasons from now we will have 27 -28 mill available. More than enough to resign Rajon and revamp or retain the bench too.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
xBulletproof
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,846
And1: 5,871
Joined: May 26, 2013
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#45 » by xBulletproof » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:40 pm

You're right. He really was trying to be the #1 option. Even though he wasn't (Monta Ellis?) That's yet another problem.

I'm glad to see NBA GM's agree with me on this, I was curious how he would be treated. Seeing something in Jennings just looks to me like 'grass is greener on the other side'. My family is from Wisconsin. I have an interest in keeping tabs. I've seen him play a lot. Maybe you just caught his good days?
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,788
And1: 14,062
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#46 » by Scoot McGroot » Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:49 am

Boneman2 wrote:^^^ Those numbers are predicated from Brandon trying to be a number one scoring option. Let me be clear, if BJ played here he would not play the same style because Lance, Paul, David, Roy, etc. would not allow it. This could lead to chemistry issues so it ultimately might not be worth the risk, even though he is a better pg.

At this point the only way to upgrade the 1 is to package Hill/Stephenson/ *Fut 1st for Rondo. Any other pg. available now is a lateral move at best.

* (2016 1st would be contingent on RR resigning.) In this scenario, two seasons from now we will have 27 -28 mill available. More than enough to resign Rajon and revamp or retain the bench too.


You can hope that, but it's not likely. He's never played a team game in 20 years. Why now? Because we think our guys are better than that? Sure, they are. But that doesn't mean Brandon would respond. I'd bet that he's more likely to go Tinsley on us; active sabotage and lackluster will
User avatar
tocooks
Banned User
Posts: 253
And1: 13
Joined: Apr 24, 2012

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#47 » by tocooks » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:47 am

Jennings is a volume shooter and needs to be a 2nd or 3rd option to keep him mentally checked into the game, he would be 4th or 5th on our current team.

We are fine at point guard, Hill fits perfectly with our system, culture and personnel. Ask Greg Popovich or Frank Vogel who they would rather have.
User avatar
OnFire
Junior
Posts: 326
And1: 31
Joined: Jul 12, 2006

Re: Jennings for Granger 

Post#48 » by OnFire » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:24 am

tocooks wrote:Jennings is a volume shooter and needs to be a 2nd or 3rd option to keep him mentally checked into the game, he would be 4th or 5th on our current team.

We are fine at point guard, Hill fits perfectly with our system, culture and personnel. Ask Greg Popovich or Frank Vogel who they would rather have.


heck, all things equal,
ask Larry Drew who
he'd rather have.

Return to Indiana Pacers