Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola

User avatar
RealGM Articles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,025
And1: 48
Joined: Mar 20, 2013

Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#1 » by RealGM Articles » Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:37 am

The Indiana Pacers have a relatively young core and were just one win away from reaching the NBA Finals in June, but won’t simply rely on internal development to take the next step. The Pacers drafted Solomon Hill, re-signed David West and landed C.J. Watson and Chris Copeland via free agency. They are also expecting Danny Granger to be healthy in training camp. 


Indiana’s most recent move might not have the impact of re-signing West or eventual extension for Paul George, but it certainly was the most creative. The Pacers have sent Gerald Green, Miles Plumlee and a future first round pick to the Phoenix Suns in exchange for veteran Luis Scola.


Scola adds interior depth to the bench, which was the team’s weak spot this past season. Frank Vogel can now feature a second unit that includes Lance Stephenson (or Granger), Ian Mahinmi, Watson, Copeland and Scola. That represents a huge upgrade over the bench that was enough for them to take the eventual champion Miami Heat to seven games in the Eastern Conference Finals.


He may only be an average defender, but Scola’s offensive ability will be welcomed when West and Roy Hibbert are off the floor. Mahinmi has learned to protect the rim nicely in Vogel’s scheme, but features hands made of stone. The Pacers can play to their individual strengths when Scola and Mahinmi are playing alongside one another.


Scola might be considered by some as the replacement for Tyler Hansbrough, who was allowed to become an unrestricted free agent when his rights were renounced following the re-signing of West, but the 33-year-old is a substantial upgrade as the reserve power forward. Scola is better around the basket, has better hands and is a willing passer.


His presence will also open things up on the perimeter. Mahinmi doesn’t pose enough of an offensive threat to take attention away from the three-point line. Defenses will have to stay home on Scola, which means better looks for Watson, Copeland and Orlando Johnson.


Adding Scola to a team that expects to compete for an NBA title over the next few seasons is a nice move, but it becomes even better when you consider the price the Pacers paid for him.


Miles Plumlee might become a rotation player down the line, but the pick was puzzling last June given the perception that he's likely already reached his ceiling. It seemed like a perfect opportunity for the Pacers to roll the dice on a prospect with room to develop. He has an affordable contract with options and offers through 2017 and increased his NBA stock with a strong performance at the Orlando Summer League earlier this month.


If you have read anything I’ve written about the Pacers over the last year, you’ll know that I’m not the biggest fan of Gerald Green, the basketball player. He’s an engaging man, but was never a fit for the team. He still tantalizes people with his athleticism and leaping ability, but he’ll never be anything more than an average shooter and remains poor defensively.


Green was branded as a deep threat when he was signed to a three-year, $10.5 million contract last July, but shot just 31.4 percent from three and 36.6% overall last season. He averaged 14 points, 4.7 rebounds and 1.7 assists per 36 minutes in his only season with Indiana, projecting to take more than 14 shot attempts to get there.


His contract isn’t exorbitant, but the length was troublesome. There are just two years and $7 million left, but it’s still somewhat amazing that Larry Bird and Kevin Pritchard were able to trade it away. They had to include a lottery-protected first round pick in order to sweeten the deal but if the plan unfolds correctly, it will be very low anyway.


Grade for Pacers: A


As you might expect, the pick is the centerpiece of the deal for the Suns. I don’t believe Ryan McDonough is done tinkering, but even as the roster currently stands Plumlee can play a handful of minutes in the paint and Green can run up-and-down the court with Eric Bledsoe.


Phoenix is stockpiling first round picks to ease the rebuilding process and there is a chance they’ll have five such picks in the next few drafts. Including their own selections, which figure to be relatively high, the Suns now three incoming first rounders -- Minnesota Timberwolves (protected from 2014-16), Los Angeles Lakers (top protection from 2015-17) and this one.


Scola was an odd fit on Phoenix’s transitioning roster and will benefit significantly from the deal in terms of playoff contention and a shot at a championship. The salaries are fairly even for 2013-14, but if the Suns choose not to trigger Plumlee’s option for 2014-15 they’ll save a little over a million dollars. That’s of little significance at this point, but it’s one of the benefits nonetheless.


Grade for Suns: C+


It isn’t even August and the Pacers have re-signed West, added Watson and Copeland and traded for Scola while remaining close to $7 million below the tax threshold and keeping Granger’s expiring $14 million deal. Not a bad summer so far.



luxurytax
Banned User
Posts: 47
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#2 » by luxurytax » Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:37 pm

Considering the Suns claimed Scola off waivers about a year ago, and were able to turn that into a first rounder and a young player, they should have earned better than a C+.
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,584
And1: 9,785
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#3 » by King4Day » Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:12 am

Homer Pacers writer I'm guessing? C+ for the Suns? Seriously? Does he think this was a move to make the Suns title contenders immediately?
This is the first article I've read saying the Suns did poorly. I'll take Marc Stein and Woj's opinions over this one.
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
frizzledizzle
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,804
And1: 130
Joined: Jul 25, 2010

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#4 » by frizzledizzle » Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:01 pm

Perhaps it's Suns fans that are homers for thinking this is such a great deal.

Gerald Green is horrible. I wouldn't even want him on my team if he accounted for zero dollars towards the cap space and was only owed a dollar burger a season. If you're looking to tank, he's your man. He'll chuck you right into a top 5 pick.

And I see you referred to Miles Plumlee as a young player. How so? Dude was a 24 year old rookie and turns 25 in 33 days. His numbers were terrible at Duke and only managed to see 55 minutes as an old rookie. That speaks volumes seeing as Paul George and Lance Stephenson were both starting this past season at the age of 22 while George Hill and Roy Hibbert were starting at the age of 26. There is a reason Plumlee didn't see the floor.

So... now you have a bad player/contract and a bad payer/late draft pick. There was a future 1st round pick thrown in but that's going to be about 25th in the draft anyways. What's so impressive about netting two scrubs and a late 1st round pick? Sure, you claimed Scola off waivers but you still took back a bad contract in Gerald Green and Miles Plumlee is worthless. So unless that 25th pick pans out, you acquired essentially nothing while the Pacers bolstered their bench. The Suns really didn't gain much if anything in my opinion. I'd say having to take Green back outweighs that late 1st round pick. Miles Plumlee won't even see the floor and will probably be out of the league when his rookie contract expires.
luxurytax
Banned User
Posts: 47
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#5 » by luxurytax » Tue Jul 30, 2013 1:22 am

frizzledizzle wrote:Perhaps it's Suns fans that are homers for thinking this is such a great deal.

Gerald Green is horrible. I wouldn't even want him on my team if he accounted for zero dollars towards the cap space and was only owed a dollar burger a season. If you're looking to tank, he's your man. He'll chuck you right into a top 5 pick.

And I see you referred to Miles Plumlee as a young player. How so? Dude was a 24 year old rookie and turns 25 in 33 days. His numbers were terrible at Duke and only managed to see 55 minutes as an old rookie. That speaks volumes seeing as Paul George and Lance Stephenson were both starting this past season at the age of 22 while George Hill and Roy Hibbert were starting at the age of 26. There is a reason Plumlee didn't see the floor.

So... now you have a bad player/contract and a bad payer/late draft pick. There was a future 1st round pick thrown in but that's going to be about 25th in the draft anyways. What's so impressive about netting two scrubs and a late 1st round pick? Sure, you claimed Scola off waivers but you still took back a bad contract in Gerald Green and Miles Plumlee is worthless. So unless that 25th pick pans out, you acquired essentially nothing while the Pacers bolstered their bench. The Suns really didn't gain much if anything in my opinion. I'd say having to take Green back outweighs that late 1st round pick. Miles Plumlee won't even see the floor and will probably be out of the league when his rookie contract expires.


You are not thinking in the right mindset. You assume the Suns "lost" the trade because the Pacers "won" it. I completely agree that this a great deal for Indiana, given their circumstances. However, given the Suns' circumstances, picking up a veteran off waivers and turning that into young players with some degree of potential (yes, they may not pan out) while shedding salary is a good move for the Suns. Some trades can be won by both teams. Some trades can have two losers too. This trade fits what the Pacers needed, and the Suns will take a chance on some young players. The likelihood is they won't pan out into anything great. But that chance is worth more than retaining Scola on a team that won't go anywhere in the short-term, until eventually he is worth nothing and he walks or becomes too old to have trade value.
marley987
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 03, 2013

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#6 » by marley987 » Sun Aug 4, 2013 2:08 pm

Guys, i am waiting the grading of the Jennings-Knight trade ...
Cassius
RealGM
Posts: 16,095
And1: 4,369
Joined: Aug 19, 2005
Location: We won.
     

Re: Grading The Deal: Pacers Trade For Luis Scola 

Post#7 » by Cassius » Sun Aug 4, 2013 9:49 pm

The last thing you want to give a rookie coach who's an ex-player is reliable veteran to take minutes away from the kids and potentially steal a game that could cost you the top pick in what should be an historic draft (see: Voshon Lenard, Raptors during 2002-03 season)
I_Like_Dirt wrote:The whole comparison to Kevin McHale is ridiculously close, imo... And that's without more hilarious aspects of the comparison, e.g. if Wally Sczerbiak were 7 feet tall with the slower reflexes that came with the additional height, he'd be Bargnani.

Return to Articles Discussion