Image Image Image Image

2013 trade deadline discussion thread

User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#1 » by hermes » Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:51 pm

figured since its getting close to july rumors could start creeping up here and there, so we can talk about it all here

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/941 ... -mlb-teams
got inspired by this

Code: Select all

Does any team have more quality trade chips and more motivation to cash them in than the Cubs? Consider:

Matt Garza: The 29-year-old right-hander spent the first seven weeks on the DL. He mixed good results with bad in his first five starts, including a nine-run debacle against the Reds on June 11. He's looked like the Garza of old in two starts since, striking out 13 batters, walking just four, and allowing just one run and seven hits over 15 innings. Two and a half years ago, the Rays landed two premium prospects and a total of five players in a deal for Garza and two throw-ins. Now he's three months away from free agency and will thus fetch much less in trade. But if Garza keeps pitching like he has in his past two starts, or even approaches what he did in 2011, he'll attract plenty of suitors.

Scott Feldman: Another walk-year starting pitcher, Feldman earned that status thanks to a lack of interest last winter that allowed the Cubs to land him on a dirt-cheap, one-year, $6 million deal. Though he's stumbled a bit lately, Feldman's still on pace for a better-than-average season, sporting a 3.39 ERA and 3.91 FIP, inducing enough ground balls, and showing strong enough control to overcome a lack of swing-and-miss stuff. If Feldman's still a Cub on August 1, someone out there probably didn't try hard enough.

Nate Schierholtz: He's 29 years old, he's raking to the tune of .296/.347/.558, he mashes right-handed pitching, he's an above-average defender, he's only owed about $1.2 million for the rest of the season, and he still offers a year of team control after this one. Though he's by no means a big-name player, you might not find three other players anywhere who'll get dealt at the deadline and make a bigger impact than Schierholtz could.

There's plenty more here, whether it's a relief-starved team buying into Kevin Gregg's unlikely resurrection, Luis Valbuena offering low-cost, high-OBP help to teams who need upgrades at second or third base, or David DeJesus offering a diversified skill set in the outfield, assuming he can come off the DL sometime soon.

With this much available talent and plenty of desire to sell, the Cubs could be the busiest team in the league over the next few weeks.


so any initial thoughts? are we going to be one of the busiest teams? what should we be looking to get done over the next month+

edit- updated trades (as of 7/2)

7/2 trades-
cubs receive: pedro strop, jake arrieta, and international bonus slots 3 and 4
orioles receive: scott feldman, steve clevenger

cubs receive: matt guerrier
dodgers receive: carlos marmol, international bonus slot 4

cubs receive: international bonus slots 2 and 3
astros receive: ronald torreyes (in minors)
User avatar
ChronicKerr
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 59
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Old Town
       

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#2 » by ChronicKerr » Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:07 pm

Trade for David Price!!!!
HBK9
Sophomore
Posts: 149
And1: 7
Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Location: Villa Park
Contact:

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#3 » by HBK9 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:35 pm

They just designated Marmol.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#4 » by Posey H8er » Tue Jun 25, 2013 5:52 pm

It'll be difficult to find a trade partner for Marmol. We also released Ian Stewart.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/ ... t-released
HBK9
Sophomore
Posts: 149
And1: 7
Joined: Jan 31, 2011
Location: Villa Park
Contact:

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#5 » by HBK9 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:54 pm

I don't think they can. He is terrible and I am talking about his stuff not about all the other things. Too bad they pulled out of the Angels deal.
User avatar
ChronicKerr
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 59
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Old Town
       

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#6 » by ChronicKerr » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:32 pm

HBK9 wrote:I don't think they can. He is terrible and I am talking about his stuff not about all the other things. Too bad they pulled out of the Angels deal.


At the time I was really hoping for the Cubs to get Haren in that deal but after seeing him throw this year I don't regret it much. Haren has been putrid all season long and appears to pretty much be done. He was making quite a bit more than Marmol (each on their last year in the deal) so not a huge loss, really. The time to trade Marmol was 2-3 years ago when he was looking like one of the top relievers in the game and coulda fetched a pretty penny. Held a bit too long here.

I'm mostly bitter about signing E-Jax over upping the offer to Sanchez just a bit. That one stings.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#7 » by hermes » Mon Jul 8, 2013 11:30 pm

User avatar
Air Poohdini
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,443
And1: 328
Joined: Jun 14, 2011
Location: ORL & CHI
       

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#8 » by Air Poohdini » Tue Jul 9, 2013 5:57 am

I wouldn't mind keeping Garza, but I still think he'll be traded.
Image
If Dennis Rodman drove a truck, he'd give all the refs a ride!
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#9 » by hermes » Tue Jul 9, 2013 1:07 pm

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... oposition/
its about 50/50

i can see him still wanting out, we've been trying to trade him for over a year

maybe this is all a ploy to get more out of a team
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#10 » by hermes » Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:19 am

User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#11 » by hermes » Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:04 am

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... amardzija/
listening to talks for shark? i thought they were building the staff around him?

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... with_cubs/
and nate wants to stay, i like him - think he's got a shot at sticking around?
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#12 » by GYBE » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:23 pm

I think Schierholtz is probably gone. Along with maybe Gregg, he's the only guy that could deliver an actual prospect.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#13 » by hermes » Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:04 pm

http://baseball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ ... ub_traded/
yeah seems the next guy to potentially go is schierholtz

too bad since he really seems to like it here and wants to stay
Badbeats
Rookie
Posts: 1,205
And1: 394
Joined: Feb 07, 2012
Location: Naperville, IL
       

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#14 » by Badbeats » Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:49 pm

I think the front office has done a good job so far but we need to move more players.

Jackson/Gregg deal to Atl would be fantastic. They need a SP since Hudson went down and are looking for bullpen help.

Schierholtz/Navarro to TB would also make sense. They have a great farm system and both of these players would not break the bank. They could use the upgrade at catcher and were looking for a LH bat.

Dejesus/Russell to Oakland. They could also look at Nate and Russell. They have a lot of OF's who are not hitting. They also were looking for some LH relief in the pen.

Come on Front Office... 1 hour left lets move some players!
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,966
And1: 25,656
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#15 » by hermes » Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:32 pm

doesn't seem like we made any more moves


although we did deny trading navarro to the cards, good for us - don't want to be helping out the redbirds
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: 2013 trade deadline discussion thread 

Post#16 » by karch34 » Thu Aug 1, 2013 4:09 am

Kind of glad we didn't trade Schierholtz. He's the kind of guy I'd like to keep around on a young team if he doesn't command too much money.

Return to Chicago Cubs