Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
This summer (unlike past summers) teams with cap room did not mess around much with RFA's they knew they had no chance of signing. Pekovic ended up settling on a 5 year-60 mil deal with an additional $8 mil in incentives. Should the Pistons approach Monroe now with a similar deal?
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 90
- And1: 14
- Joined: Aug 14, 2013
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
No, I think we should allow the market to decide Monroe's worth. I'm prepared to offer Monroe a big time deal though, I wouldn't be surprised if a team offered Monroe close to max money.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
12mil per year for Monroe would be an absolute steal. Pek had very similar stats to Monroe but I think Monroe definitely has more value due to his playmaking ability and being able to be a go-to low post player. If Monroe improves next year, which I think is highly likely, I see him getting the max or close to it.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,423
- And1: 1,963
- Joined: Oct 05, 2012
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Moose will get a Max contract
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,973
- And1: 4,897
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
I'll give the max. No need to squabble over a few mill when its negligible cap space
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,963
- And1: 2,829
- Joined: Jun 01, 2013
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
I'd settle for 12 mil a year if we have to. If he really plays insane this season, then I would totally throw him the max.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- MrBigShot
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,595
- And1: 20,164
- Joined: Dec 18, 2010
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
The whole point to extending him before the offseason would be to get a discount and show him we value him as a core member. I hope we extend him before the off season.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
No guys like favors, and cousins will
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,259
- And1: 326
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
MrBigShot wrote:The whole point to extending him before the offseason would be to get a discount and show him we value him as a core member. I hope we extend him before the off season.
Falk has already said Monroe would test the market next summer.
I can defiantly see the Blazers offersheeting Monroe. They offersheeted Hibbert last year, and they tried offersheeting Splitter this offseason.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,374
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Aug 12, 2010
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though. He still has to sign the offersheet first. If he wants to stay here why would he sign another teams offersheet? If he doesn't want to stay here then we should just trade him mid-season before it comes to that. I might be open to giving him the max if he's 100% committed to us, but if hhe half wants to go somewhere else, probably not a good idea to match anyways. We don't need to give max contracts to players who don't want to be here, just to retain their rights. Sounds like a mess waiting to happen.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 328
- And1: 54
- Joined: Jan 16, 2013
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Q00 wrote:Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though. He still has to sign the offersheet first. If he wants to stay here why would he sign another teams offersheet? If he doesn't want to stay here then we should just trade him mid-season before it comes to that.
Lets be real that isn't how most situations work out. Most players aren't like Carmelo or Dwight and publicly say that they want to go to some other destination, especially a player of Monroe's caliber (not exactly elite.) More likely is that Monroe will wait out the regular season by saying that he loves being on the Pistons and would like to return. That may be true and all, but probably only if Detroit offers the most money possible. If he gets more money from somewhere else, he's going to take that offer.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 328
- And1: 54
- Joined: Jan 16, 2013
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Since this was edited in I should respond to this too
Just because a player signs a max contract with another team does not mean that they don't want to stay with their current team. Now if both teams were offering the max and Monroe still chose the other team then you'd have a point, but by the looks of it the Pistons are going to let Monroe explore the open market and match that deal. Monroe isn't "wanting out" for trying to get a max deal with another team if we don't offer him max money, he's being smart.
Q00 wrote:I might be open to giving him the max if he's 100% committed to us, but if hhe half wants to go somewhere else, probably not a good idea to match anyways. We don't need to give max contracts to players who don't want to be here, just to retain their rights. Sounds like a mess waiting to happen.
Just because a player signs a max contract with another team does not mean that they don't want to stay with their current team. Now if both teams were offering the max and Monroe still chose the other team then you'd have a point, but by the looks of it the Pistons are going to let Monroe explore the open market and match that deal. Monroe isn't "wanting out" for trying to get a max deal with another team if we don't offer him max money, he's being smart.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
This is the genius of the Smith signing. Currently if Moose wanted the max, i wouldn't pay it, Matter fact i see very little that moose could do this year that would command the max. However i do see a desperate team or a "outsmart himself" GM that would offer moose the max and he'd be a idiot not to take it. Smiths ability to play the PF position, allows us to immediately fill that whole with allstar talent as well leverage in the dealings and sign and trade
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
It's certainly going to be something that Monroe's agent is going to bring up. But, I believe 58 million is the max extension you can receive coming off a rookie contract.
If Joe can resign him at 12-13 million per season, it would be ideal. If Moose comes out this year and nails that 15-17 foot jumper at around 50%, and shows he can be a committed defender, and Drummond doesn't improve by the leaps and bounds that 95% of this board has already assured us that he will, Monroe's play could convince Dumars to go all-in on a 5-year max deal like Johnny Wall just signed.
DBB just posted an article comparing Moose and Pek's production. They're very similar. So, it's going to be relevant.
If Joe can resign him at 12-13 million per season, it would be ideal. If Moose comes out this year and nails that 15-17 foot jumper at around 50%, and shows he can be a committed defender, and Drummond doesn't improve by the leaps and bounds that 95% of this board has already assured us that he will, Monroe's play could convince Dumars to go all-in on a 5-year max deal like Johnny Wall just signed.
DBB just posted an article comparing Moose and Pek's production. They're very similar. So, it's going to be relevant.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,982
- And1: 1,636
- Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Moose is better than Pekovic in every facet of the game- he is a better rebounder, passer and scorer and is also 4 years younger. So yeah- Moose is going to get paid. Im unsure why people think he can be had for 12 per. If we dont offer him the max- Washington will.
Wall/Beal/Porter/Monroe
Wall/Beal/Porter/Monroe

Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
- roc
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,252
- And1: 983
- Joined: May 29, 2006
- Location: roc city
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Q00 wrote:Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though.
I would say we have to match no matter the cost. Letting an asset like Moose leave for nothing in return would be bad business. Match him and if need be... trade him later. That way we at least get something out of it.

the crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,374
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Aug 12, 2010
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
rock digger wrote:Q00 wrote:Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though. He still has to sign the offersheet first. If he wants to stay here why would he sign another teams offersheet? If he doesn't want to stay here then we should just trade him mid-season before it comes to that.
Lets be real that isn't how most situations work out. Most players aren't like Carmelo or Dwight and publicly say that they want to go to some other destination, especially a player of Monroe's caliber (not exactly elite.) More likely is that Monroe will wait out the regular season by saying that he loves being on the Pistons and would like to return. That may be true and all, but probably only if Detroit offers the most money possible. If he gets more money from somewhere else, he's going to take that offer.
If we're being real, Joe isn't going to let Monroe play him like that. He will know ahead of time how much he's willing to spend on Moose. He's not just going to wait and let some other team outbid him and steal Monroe for nothing. He will likely have ongoing discussions with his agent all season, and will have a very good idea where both sides are at. If he doesn't plan to give him the max, and is worried Monroe will leave for more money, then he will just trade him before then. Monroe can say he wants to stay, at which point Joe will tell him to prove it and sign an extension. If he then says I want to wait, then its obvious he doesn't really want to stay, and then Joe trades him.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 328
- And1: 54
- Joined: Jan 16, 2013
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
Q00 wrote:rock digger wrote:Q00 wrote:Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though. He still has to sign the offersheet first. If he wants to stay here why would he sign another teams offersheet? If he doesn't want to stay here then we should just trade him mid-season before it comes to that.
Lets be real that isn't how most situations work out. Most players aren't like Carmelo or Dwight and publicly say that they want to go to some other destination, especially a player of Monroe's caliber (not exactly elite.) More likely is that Monroe will wait out the regular season by saying that he loves being on the Pistons and would like to return. That may be true and all, but probably only if Detroit offers the most money possible. If he gets more money from somewhere else, he's going to take that offer.
If we're being real, Joe isn't going to let Monroe play him like that. He will know ahead of time how much he's willing to spend on Moose. He's not just going to wait and let some other team outbid him and steal Monroe for nothing. He will likely have ongoing discussions with his agent all season, and will have a very good idea where both sides are at. If he doesn't plan to give him the max, and is worried Monroe will leave for more money, then he will just trade him before then. Monroe can say he wants to stay, at which point Joe will tell him to prove it and sign an extension. If he then says I want to wait, then its obvious he doesn't really want to stay, and then Joe trades him.
Seeing as how Monroe wants to test the free agent market and not talk about an extension mid-season, I guess we're out one Greg Monroe by your thought process!
Monroe isn't going to settle for a 12-14 million extension when there are legitimate questions as to whether or not he can get the max from some random team, so yep, buh-bye Monroe, thanks for your hard work.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,374
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Aug 12, 2010
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
rock digger wrote:Since this was edited in I should respond to this tooQ00 wrote:I might be open to giving him the max if he's 100% committed to us, but if hhe half wants to go somewhere else, probably not a good idea to match anyways. We don't need to give max contracts to players who don't want to be here, just to retain their rights. Sounds like a mess waiting to happen.
Just because a player signs a max contract with another team does not mean that they don't want to stay with their current team. Now if both teams were offering the max and Monroe still chose the other team then you'd have a point, but by the looks of it the Pistons are going to let Monroe explore the open market and match that deal. Monroe isn't "wanting out" for trying to get a max deal with another team if we don't offer him max money, he's being smart.
Its actually not that smart if he signs an offer sheet with another team, (if he doesn't really want to play for that team) just to try and get us to up our offer. Its very possible we don't match and then he's forced to move somewhere he didn't want to for the next 4-5 years. That's why I said its not guaranteed he signs an offersheet just because its offered to him. He may want to stay here, and if he knows Joe isn't going to match the price, he's not going to sign it. If he doesn't want to stay here for the price we offer, then Joe will find out ahead of time and trade him.
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,374
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Aug 12, 2010
-
Re: Does Pekovic's deal set the market for Moose?
r0cd0gg wrote:Q00 wrote:Just because a team offers Monroe an offersheet doesn't mean we have to match though.
I would say we have to match no matter the cost. Letting an asset like Moose leave for nothing in return would be bad business. Match him and if need be... trade him later. That way we at least get something out of it.
I meant we wouldn't have to match because it wouldn't be guaranteed that Monroe signs the offer sheet, in the event he didn't want to play for that team.