therealbig3 wrote:Except the Thunder with Westbrook in 2012 had an incredible playoff offense, while their offense fell off a cliff without him in 2013 while Kevin Durant looked lost.
are you serious? you remove a 37% (... yeah.) usage player from any offense two games into a playoff series and see what happens. westbrook has been an abysmal playoff performer every single year he's been in them, through the roof usage, horrid efficiency, high turnovers, innumerable open teammates missed, constant failure to deliver the ball to durant in key situations, and tons of off balance shots tossed up which lead to run outs for the other team. the thunder are a really good offensive team because of kevin durant. period. with their current roster, their current offense, with the years of experience and chemistry they've built up together, the fact that theyre replacing him with talentless trash, are they better with westbrook than without him? i should **** hope so. but if you ask me if they'd be better with westbrook than with ty lawson or kyrie irving or rajon rondo or damian lillard, ill tell you, after a season of building chemsitry, **** not. rate all those guys over him.
I'm not even a fan of the guy, but he gets pretty underrated here, while he's overrated in general.
more like everyone watched him in the playoffs in 2012 and recognized that he sucks, there was subsequent backlash, and people started to pretend he wasnt that bad. except he is.