Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs)

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,477
And1: 16,024
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#21 » by fatlever » Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:27 am

ClintonDemocrat wrote:
EArl wrote:Great PG, but was shadowed by the likes of Magic and such.


Great? Mmm. Too strong an adjective. The 80s Nuggs played a grotesquely fast offensive pace under Doug Moe and Lever was a very competent stat filler, but so was Rod Strickland. They exist, but it doesn't make them great players. A player who certainly talented in some ways? Yeah. Maybe one of the final AS Game substitute selections on a given year? Yeah.

He wasn't unknown outside of hardcore fans, either, as claimed above. He made at least one ASG. I saw a piece of one recently where he was out there as an early sub alongside Magic and most of the EAST's starters. He looked noticeably out of place at that point in the game and Magic was passing him the ball at midcourt so Fat could have some time on camera initiating plays.


fat made two all-star games and was voted in as a starter by the fans (well deserved) in one of them. you dont get voted in as a starter while playing for a team like the nuggets unless you are deserving and known by fans.

17pts in 1st all-star game in 31 minutes, 16pts in 22 minutes in his second... hardly seems out of place.

he tore his ACL during his peak (start of season after making his 2nd all-star game). came back, played half a season the next year then tore his ACL again and missed another year and that was it for his career.

perhaps what you saw in the all-star game was a very unselfish, humble, quiet, team first player in fat who was not the type of player who stood out in an all-star game setting.

watch that video i posted on the 1st page. that was against michael jordan.

btw, rod strickland was a solid nba pg but he never had the blazing fast quickness and nose for the ball that made fat special.
astrallite
Starter
Posts: 2,124
And1: 13
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#22 » by astrallite » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:50 am

Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.
User avatar
LeonSmith
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 145
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#23 » by LeonSmith » Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:37 am

astrallite wrote:Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.


What the hell.
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 649
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#24 » by Frank Mulely » Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:23 am

Fat Lever was nice with it! I was a fan of those 80s Doug Moe / Alex English / Fat Lever Nuggets teams . So fun to watch. Kind of the last gasp for ABA style in the NBA.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
Deus
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 149
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
       

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#25 » by Deus » Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:25 pm

Fat was a great player regardless of the type of game Doug Moe came up with. But he only had 4 good seasons from 86-89. Then my Mavericks got swindled by Denver when they traded for him in 1990 for 2 #1 picks. He ended up playing only 4 games for the Mavs in 1990 because he was injured. The start of a great decade. :x
astrallite
Starter
Posts: 2,124
And1: 13
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#26 » by astrallite » Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:16 pm

LeonSmith wrote:
astrallite wrote:Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.


What the hell.


So where's Jason Kidd's collage of windmill dunks?
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,477
And1: 16,024
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#27 » by fatlever » Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:25 pm

LeonSmith wrote:
astrallite wrote:Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.


What the hell.


not athletic? first time i saw him at california my jaw dropped.

he was a freak in college

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNwqYaEPaA[/youtube]
User avatar
AJ Valliant
Rookie
Posts: 1,240
And1: 629
Joined: Feb 25, 2009
       

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#28 » by AJ Valliant » Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:59 pm

astrallite wrote:
LeonSmith wrote:
astrallite wrote:Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.


What the hell.


So where's Jason Kidd's collage of windmill dunks?


Clearly the sole benchmark of athleticism. Speed, strength, balance, coordination, change of direction, 2nd jump, all meaningless without a plethora of windmill dunk highlights to validate them.
User avatar
LeonSmith
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 145
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#29 » by LeonSmith » Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:22 pm

astrallite wrote:
LeonSmith wrote:
astrallite wrote:Jason Kidd has never been athletic, is 6'3, and has averaged over 8 rebounds a game before, so it shouldn't be a surprise that another guard his size could average more rebounds.


What the hell.


So where's Jason Kidd's collage of windmill dunks?


Athleticism doesn't equal "how high can you jump".

Steve Nash is still an elite athlete. It's more than simply your vertical. It includes a plethora of attributes that AJ Valliant touched on above.

I hope you learnt something today, although something tells me you haven't.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,713
And1: 8,350
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#30 » by trex_8063 » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:17 am

AJ Valliant wrote:
Clearly the sole benchmark of athleticism. Speed, strength, balance, coordination, change of direction, 2nd jump, all meaningless without a plethora of windmill dunk highlights to validate them.



I'd "And MORE than 1" if I could.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,713
And1: 8,350
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#31 » by trex_8063 » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:22 am

LeonSmith wrote:Steve Nash is still an elite athlete. It's more than simply your vertical. It includes a plethora of attributes that AJ Valliant touched on above.


I don't know that I'd go so far as to call Nash an "ELITE athlete" (by NBA standards), though his athleticism is better than its often given credit for.
His balance, coordination, agility, are all above average (even elite)---even by NBA standards. A handful of years ago, his stamina/conditioning were top-notch, too.

However, his speed and quickness are purely mediocre by NBA standards. And his size, strength/power, and leaping ability are all below average (and by a pretty large margin) by NBA standards.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
LeonSmith
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 145
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#32 » by LeonSmith » Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:17 am

trex_8063 wrote:
LeonSmith wrote:Steve Nash is still an elite athlete. It's more than simply your vertical. It includes a plethora of attributes that AJ Valliant touched on above.


I don't know that I'd go so far as to call Nash an "ELITE athlete" (by NBA standards), though his athleticism is better than its often given credit for.
His balance, coordination, agility, are all above average (even elite)---even by NBA standards. A handful of years ago, his stamina/conditioning were top-notch, too.

However, his speed and quickness are purely mediocre by NBA standards. And his size, strength/power, and leaping ability are all below average (and by a pretty large margin) by NBA standards.


True, obviously elite compared to Average Joe, not by NBA standards. Still athletic by NBA standards though. Just went a little far when refuting the guy who thinks if you can't windmill dunk you're not athletic, hah.
astrallite
Starter
Posts: 2,124
And1: 13
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Fat Lever (26pts/10rebs/9assts) vs Lakers (1987 Playoffs 

Post#33 » by astrallite » Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:53 pm

LeonSmith wrote:
astrallite wrote:
LeonSmith wrote:
What the hell.


So where's Jason Kidd's collage of windmill dunks?


Athleticism doesn't equal "how high can you jump".

Steve Nash is still an elite athlete. It's more than simply your vertical. It includes a plethora of attributes that AJ Valliant touched on above.

I hope you learnt something today, although something tells me you haven't.


So basically what I learned is Jason Kidd gets no credit when he says he was never athletic, and its not about his effort, it's actually because he was athletic. :lol:

Return to The General Board