drza wrote:Vote: still no strong feeling, but I'll go with Curry
Nominate: Kevin Garnett
Since KG hasn't gotten any traction yet, I figured I'd post a small blurb on why I think he should rank this high.
1) He's still very arguably the best defensive player in the NBA. By the numbers he's had a very strong case for Defensive Player of the Year in at least two of the last three seasons, and last year was no exception as he once again was right at the top of the league in every +/- based defensive stat.
2) He still is much more productive than his narrative. In fact, his production over the past couple of years looks eerily similar to the player voted #5 on this list. Over the past 2 years, Garnett has played in one more regular season game than Duncan and averaged 1 more minute per game in the regular season. And while Duncan has better box score stats in the regular season over that span, KG tops him in the playoffs in both the boxes and +/-. To whit:
TD reg season '12, '13: 16.7 ppg on 54.4% TS, 9.5 rpg (2013 RAPM +4.2, 15th in league) in 29.2 mpg
KG reg season '12, '13: 15.2 ppg on 54.2% TS, 8.0 rpg (2013 RAPM +6.1, 3rd in league) in 30.4 mpg
TD playoffs '12, '13: 17.8 ppg, 52.6% TS, 9.9 rpg (on/off +/- of +9.8 per 48) in 34.2 mpg
KG playoffs '12, '13: 17.7 ppg, 54.4% TS, 11.1 rpg (on/off +/- of +28.5 per 48) in 36.5 mpg
Garnett isn't what he used to be, but he's still one of the best in the league.
And Garnett has been a part of a broken offense the last 2 years, while Duncan has been a part of one of the most efficient offenses the last 2 years...Duncan isn't even the best offensive player on the Spurs...he's 3rd if Manu is healthy.
In terms of skill and ability, Duncan doesn't really do much of anything better than KG...he's in a better system with some more talented players around him. Duncan probably still is the better low post scorer, but that's diminished pretty significantly to be honest and there's not much of a gap between the two...Duncan is the better rebounder, since KG's rebounding hasn't aged as well...but KG is the far better outside shooter, and is and has always been a better passer. Defensively, I think I'd honestly take KG as well...Duncan was great this past year, but he's not as mobile as KG, which is seriously important in terms of defending the PnR...Steph Curry probably doesn't go off as much against the Spurs if that was KG instead of Duncan, since Duncan had to play off him on the PnR, since he was too slow to keep up with him on the perimeter...not as big of a problem with KG.
Duncan's low post scoring ability has generally been why I give him a slight edge over KG in terms of their careers, but as of right now, with Duncan's low post scoring not really being all that great anymore (he was getting destroyed one on one against Bogut, Gasol, and Howard/Gasol), they're pretty much even to me. And the Spurs played at a higher pace than the Celtics...pace-adjusted to per 75 possessions this past regular season:
TD: 22.6 ppg, 12.6 rpg, 3.4 apg, 2.7 TOpg, 55.4% TS, 107 ORating
KG: 19.6 ppg, 10.3 rpg, 3.0 apg, 2.1 TOpg, 53.5% TS, 104 ORating
TD has slightly higher raw stats, slightly better offensive efficiency, but again, he is definitely in a better situation...he really relies on being spoonfed for a lot of his offense at this stage of his career, which Parker, Manu, and Pop's system provides for him...he's nowhere close to being able to anchor an offense by himself anymore. That efficiency would plummet if not for the wide open jumpers and layups he gets every game. KG actually had to co-anchor an offense with Pierce this past season, and actually did a fantastic job.
At minimum, there's no significant gap between the two, which suggests that TD at #5 means KG should probably have gone around #10. TD's on the same minutes restrictions as KG as well, so that can't really be a reason to drop KG either in comparison to TD.
I love TD, but I really think he's gotten overrated the past couple of years because of his stats...his stats would look very different if he was on our ISO-heavy team last year for example...he would have struggled imo. I don't even think he's the one on one scorer that Lopez is at this point. He's a smarter player that passes better and sees the court better and reacts to defenses better....but as a pure scorer, which he would have had to be on an ISO-heavy offense, he's not on Lopez's level.