Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe..

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Jonny Blaze
Veteran
Posts: 2,803
And1: 1,414
Joined: Jun 20, 2011

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#181 » by Jonny Blaze » Fri Aug 16, 2013 5:40 pm

Imon wrote:
Jonny Blaze wrote:Does anyone have the breakdown of these Kevin Garnett games as well as Game 7 performances?


KG game 7s...
I hope I did this right...

37.6 MPG
18.6 PPG
11.3 RPG
2 APG
1.5 SPG
1.8 TOPG

3 PFs/Game

(47/91) FG/FGA (51.6%)
(1/2) 3PT/3PTA (50%)
(17/25) FT/FTA (68%)

4 wins - 2 losses


Thank You

Im curious how these stats compare to guys like Pau Gasol, Jason Terry, Chris Bosh.

Did KG average go down in the playoffs as compared to the regular season?

I ask......because those stats aren't anywhere close to being superstar caliber. They are good stats from your 2nd or 3rd best player......but you aren't going to win a lot of playoff series if your best player only averages 18 ppg in elimination games
Imon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,897
And1: 6,263
Joined: Oct 18, 2012
Location: Ft. Worth

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#182 » by Imon » Fri Aug 16, 2013 6:09 pm

Chris Bosh has only played in three game 7s.
And his performance is abysmal.

31 Min 8/10 (.800) 3/4 (.750) 3PT/3PTA 0/0 FT/FTA 8 RBs 0 AST 1 STL 1 BLK 2 TOV 1 PF 19 PTS
30 Min 3/13(.231) 1/2 (.500) 3PT/3PTA 2/2 (1.000) FT/FTA 8 RBs 1 AST 1 STL 3 BLK 1 TOV 2 PF 9 PTS
28 Min 0/5 (.000) 0/1 (.000) 3PT/3PTA 0/0 FT/FTA 7 RBs 2 AST 0 STL 1 BLK 2 TOV 5 PF 0 PTS

AVG 29.6 MPG 11/28 (.392) 4/7 3PT/3PTA (.571) 7.6 RB/G 1 APG .6 SPG 1.6 BPG 1.6 TOV/G 9.3 PPG

To be fair though, IMO Bosh is not a franchise player and is, at best, a second fiddle but on the Miami team he is the third option.
User avatar
bobbyc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,738
And1: 138
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: NYC, NY

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#183 » by bobbyc » Fri Aug 16, 2013 6:42 pm

TMAC is GOAT
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#184 » by Narf » Fri Aug 16, 2013 6:53 pm

KG's stats went way up in the playoffs when he was in Minnesota, he just played more playoff games in Boston.
He averaged 24.0 points, 18.7 rebounds, 5.0 assist, 1.7 blocks, and 1.7 steals and lost in the first round his best year. Then 27.0 points, 15.7 rebounds 5.3 ast/1.7 stl/1.7 blocks and lost in the first round. Then 24.3 points/14.6 rebounds/5.1 assists/2.3 blcks/1.3 steals the next year and the Wolves made the WCF and only lost because Cassell AND our backup PG went down with injury. Then he went to Boston and won a ring.

It's pure fallacy that KG didn't step up his game in the playoffs and wasn't a go-to scorer in the clutch. He just had terrible teams.
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#185 » by Showtime:Part2 » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:00 pm

HotRocks34 wrote:
supaflash wrote:
2004 - Everyone knows Kobe played bad, but not that bad


Kobe's PER in the 2004 Finals was 14.63. Just to help put that into perspective, LeBron's PER in the 2011 Finals was 16.99.

If Kobe -- or one of his defenders -- tells you that the only reason he didn't win more MVPs or Finals MVPs in the three-peat era was because of Shaq, you say to them: "2004 Finals."

The 2004 Finals was the first time in the Shaq/Kobe Era that Kobe took more FGA than Shaq in a Finals series. It was his time, or so he apparently felt, to show he was ready to be "The Man." And he failed miserably. Kobe averaged around 6 more FGA/game than Shaq in the series, and we all know the result: The Lakers got "5-game swept." It was the only time in the Shaq/Kobe Era that the Lakers made The Finals that they lost.

Kobe wasn't a new guy in the league (8th season; 25 years old) at the time. He wasn't on a new team, either, like LeBron was in 2010-11.

Kobe (38% FG) seemed to shoot the Lakers out of the series. Shaq shot 63% FG for the series, but did not seem to get enough shots.

Here's a snippet of what was being said then.

http://usat.ly/15qBFCg


While Bryant is still young, he has never been Finals MVP in Los Angeles' three titles in 2000, 2001 and 2002. Those trophies belong to O'Neal. It was the pattern for those three titles. O'Neal was the man, not Bryant.

...

More pressing than statistics or MVP awards is Bryant's reluctance to be a team player in this year's championship series against the Pistons.

Jordan did the intangible tasks that helped his team win. Bryant does blatant things that do not help his team — like ignoring O'Neal in Game 4 when O'Neal gave the Lakers their only consistent scoring threat.

In five games against the Pistons, Bryant averaged 23 points, 2.8 rebounds, 4.4 assists and shot 38% from the field. The shooting percentage dipped because the Pistons played outstanding defense and because Bryant didn't mind launching wild shots. He needed to get his rather than help the Lakers get theirs.

It's not apparent why Bryant went out of his way to not pass the ball to O'Neal.

...

O'Neal said he was frustrated at his lack of touches at key times. Bryant said he needed to shoot through his shooting woes.

No one can ever accuse Jordan of letting an in-house dispute get in the way of a ring. It seemed Bryant had no problem allowing his relationship with O'Neal to disrupt Los Angeles' goal.



http://bit.ly/14zTnqX


Yes, O'Neal will get (the blame), and he'll accept it. But he won't deserve it. The clubhouse leader in the contest for most blame for the Lakers' implosion is Kobe Bryant.

...

(Kobe's) actions Sunday were horrifying to anyone who hoped that winning was more important to him than his being the hero. That is, he wants to win, but he truly believes he is, and has to be, the reason the Lakers do win. It was the ultimate act-out of the struggle for power with his 7-foot-1, 340-pound teammate.

...

Bryant once again tried to do it all himself, to the detriment of the Lakers and to the growing frustration of their best offensive option. Blame it on the octopus defense of Tayshaun Prince, the blindingly quick defensive rotations and quick recoveries by the Pistons, but Bryant shot the Lakers right out of Game 4.



http://wapo.st/17GKHwS


While the Pistons were sharing the ball and working with one another to take a 3-1 series lead, Kobe Bryant was playing the most self-absorbed game imaginable. It's as if he was oblivious to what else his team was doing. Don't let his 20 points fool you. While O'Neal was hitting 16 of 21 shots, grabbing 20 rebounds and handing out as many assists as Kobe (two), Bryant missed 17 of 25 shots, grabbed not a single rebound in 45 minutes and was a nightmare to his own team.

He played as if he had no interest whatsoever in getting the ball to O'Neal; in fact, it's fair to wonder if he wanted just the opposite.



Even a man whom I have constantly referred to on Real GM as someone whom I believe to be a key member of the Kobe Media, Ken Berger, was taking Kobe to task then:

http://bit.ly/14zVIT1


The Pistons also have pressured the Lakers' guards, sealing off penetration and forcing the ball handlers - mostly Kobe Bryant and Gary Payton - to make an extra pass. The Lakers, particularly Bryant, have been doing too much dribbling and not enough passing, as evidenced by their 27 three-point attempts in Game 3.



Kobe was horrible and everyone knew he was horrible. And if you don't believe the writers above regarding Kobe's attitude in the 2004 Finals, then you can take it from Phil Jackson himself about the 2003-04 season. Here's an excerpt from Jackson's The Last Season book about the 2003-04 season in LA:

http://bit.ly/1cqDnNQ


We were playing solid team ball, a rarity this season, although, as usual, Kobe seemed intent on taking over. “Get me the f***ing ball,” he said on his way to the bench, a demand Kobe had never verbalized. I smiled, didn’t say a word, and went to chart a play on the clipboard. I sometimes think Kobe is so addicted to being in control that he would rather shoot the ball when guarded, or even double-teamed, than dish it to an open teammate.

“They’re making you get in your attack mode,” I told him when he came off the floor during a timeout late in the game. “You’re going to have to pass the ball. They’re not calling the fouls for you.” He was in no mood to back down. “I’m going to f***ing crush them,” he said. “I just haven’t found my shooting yet.”


He never found his shooting in the 2004 Finals, either. But he kept hoisting shot after shot, and took the Lakers down with him.

This is why I laugh when I hear Kobe say the "could have won more MVPs/FMVPs if not for Shaq" stuff. He tried to do that in 2004, and got crushed. Imagine if he had tried to do it when he was even younger? It could have been even uglier.

I would imagine that the 2004 Finals experience helped Kobe realize how important Shaq was during their run together. It would be four years until Kobe Bryant would return to The Finals.


i stopped giving you any credit after the second paragraph. you seem to think that one bad finals series defines all his years with shaq. this is a complete fallacy. as a lakers suporter foremost, and a kobe supporter only in a secondary capacity, i still take offense to your claim that one series defines all his years with shaq. kobe was the guy that led us to the sweep over the 01 spurs. he was equally as important as shaq vs the kings in 01/02. i will be the first one to admit that kobe hogged the ball like crazy in the 04 finals and wasted our chance at a 4th ring. he was largley ineffective due to his ballhogging and the fact that usually iso players are at least given their own system with shooters and spacing and whatnot. he just threw the triangle aside and tried to go one on 5 without even a system for iso. it was 1 on 5 pickup ball on offense for LA in the 04 finals. but to say that means he didn't have mvp caliber years in 01 or 02 is just pure hating. and if you want to talk finals mvps at least admit that the real series were in the west and phil was smart to limit kobe and dump the ball to shaq everytime in the finals vs EC teams (when kobe listened during the 3 peat). it comes down to matchups man, you're smarter than this.
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#186 » by ardee » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:24 am

Dirk is just a beast.

I think I'm almost converted to the Dirk > KG crowd, this kind of gap in big game performances is too big to ignore.
SlobbaN
Banned User
Posts: 2,391
And1: 459
Joined: Sep 25, 2010

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#187 » by SlobbaN » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:09 am

ardee wrote:Dirk is just a beast.

I think I'm almost converted to the Dirk > KG crowd, this kind of gap in big game performances is too big to ignore.


Nah, KG fans are worse than Kobe fans. Even though all the numbers show that Dirk is a superior player, they will always say, that KG is better and by quite a lot.
User avatar
TheChosen618
Analyst
Posts: 3,744
And1: 636
Joined: Dec 03, 2012

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#188 » by TheChosen618 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:32 am

SlobbaN wrote:
ardee wrote:Dirk is just a beast.

I think I'm almost converted to the Dirk > KG crowd, this kind of gap in big game performances is too big to ignore.


Nah, KG fans are worse than Kobe fans. Even though all the numbers show that Dirk is a superior player, they will always say, that KG is better and by quite a lot.

And by all the numbers, do you just simply mean scoring numbers? Dirk wasn't better than KG at anything other than scoring. You could argue that Dirk was such a better scorer that it doesn't matter but KG is actually known to be statistically superior especially when it comes to +/- stats, APM/RAPM.
"Never say never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion." - Michael Jordan
Imon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,897
And1: 6,263
Joined: Oct 18, 2012
Location: Ft. Worth

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#189 » by Imon » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:44 pm

TheChosen618 wrote:
SlobbaN wrote:
ardee wrote:Dirk is just a beast.

I think I'm almost converted to the Dirk > KG crowd, this kind of gap in big game performances is too big to ignore.


Nah, KG fans are worse than Kobe fans. Even though all the numbers show that Dirk is a superior player, they will always say, that KG is better and by quite a lot.

And by all the numbers, do you just simply mean scoring numbers? Dirk wasn't better than KG at anything other than scoring. You could argue that Dirk was such a better scorer that it doesn't matter but KG is actually known to be statistically superior especially when it comes to +/- stats, APM/RAPM.


Just going off offensive and defensive rating here... (points scored/allowed by team per 100 possessions when player is on court).

Regular season:
Dirk
Career 117 offensive rating
Career 104 defensive rating
Net +13 points/100 possessions

KG
Career 110 offensive rating
Career 99 defensive rating
Net +11 points/100 possessions

Playoffs
Dirk
Career 118 offensive rating
Career 107 defensive rating
Net +11 points/100 possessions

KG
Career 105 offensive rating
Career 99 defensive rating
Net +6 points/100 possessions
User avatar
TheChosen618
Analyst
Posts: 3,744
And1: 636
Joined: Dec 03, 2012

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#190 » by TheChosen618 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:10 pm

Imon wrote:Just going off offensive and defensive rating here... (points scored/allowed by team per 100 possessions when player is on court).

Um, you do realize that individual offensive/defensive rating is extremely dependent on how their team and teammates play, right? Is there anyone with the right mind that believes KG had a worse supporting cast than Dirk did?
"Never say never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion." - Michael Jordan
Imon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,897
And1: 6,263
Joined: Oct 18, 2012
Location: Ft. Worth

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#191 » by Imon » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:49 pm

TheChosen618 wrote:
Imon wrote:Just going off offensive and defensive rating here... (points scored/allowed by team per 100 possessions when player is on court).

Um, you do realize that individual offensive/defensive rating is extremely dependent on how their team and teammates play, right? Is there anyone with the right mind that believes KG had a worse supporting cast than Dirk did?


Dirk's teammates throughout his NBA career have been vastly overrated.

Bradley, Dampier, Haywood and Chandler are some of the centers Dirk played significant time with, and with the exception of Chandler, none of those guys are any good.
The best teammate Dirk had throughout his prime was Jason Terry (never an all-star). When Dirk was with Nash he was young and Nash was not yet molded by D'Antoni. Jason Kidd was old as well past his prime when he played with Dirk and Dirk was in slight decline as well and Fin was never on the level as the previous two guys.

Dirk went to the Finals in 06' with a team of Dampier, Howard, Stackhouse, Harris, and Terry as the 6th man. If you replace that squad with a league-average PF that team becomes a lottery team.

In Dirk's championship season (2010-11) the team started 24-5 and then Dirk went down for 9 games with a knee injury. They went 2-7 in Dirk's absence. So when I hear about how "STACKED" people say Dirk's 10-11' team was I just laugh because the other guys lost more games in 9 games then they did in the first 29.
Dirk has the appearance of playing on good teams because he makes his teammates better and not the other way around.

KG on the other hand has no excuses for missing 3 straight playoffs in his prime. He could have at least made the 7th or 8th seed. And no excuses for him having scrubs on his team. Chris Paul played on a team full of scrubs in 2010-11 and he made the 7th seed. When Chris Paul was traded the next year the Hornets had the 2nd or 3rd worst record in the league (don't remember exactly but they were terrible). If KG can't do something a 5'11" guard can do and lift a scrubby team to a playoff spot then that's on KG.
User avatar
TheChosen618
Analyst
Posts: 3,744
And1: 636
Joined: Dec 03, 2012

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#192 » by TheChosen618 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:21 pm

Imon wrote:Dirk's teammates throughout his NBA career have been vastly overrated.

I never said his teammates were good but the stat is dependent on team play and Dirk's team was better than KG's team.

KG on the other hand has no excuses for missing 3 straight playoffs in his prime. He could have at least made the 7th or 8th seed. And no excuses for him having scrubs on his team. Chris Paul played on a team full of scrubs in 2010-11 and he made the 7th seed. When Chris Paul was traded the next year the Hornets had the 2nd or 3rd worst record in the league (don't remember exactly but they were terrible). If KG can't do something a 5'11" guard can do and lift a scrubby team to a playoff spot then that's on KG.

First off, Chris Paul's team in 2011 was not that bad. In fact, CP3's teammates in NOH were generally underrated. There have been plenty of all-time greats that failed to make the playoffs, heard of Kareem? KG's team was absolute garbage from 05-07, some of it was due to injuries and the other has to do with his teammates just not being good.

Plus, why does it matter if he can't lead a team to the playoffs with scrubs? Nobody can win a title with scrubs. You don't get brownie points for leading a bad team somewhere. It's championship or bust and teams that are bad and have a weak supporting cast have no shot at a title anyways.
"Never say never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion." - Michael Jordan
abark
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,439
And1: 3,416
Joined: May 21, 2003
Location: Miami
   

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#193 » by abark » Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:03 am

UncleDrew wrote:
Ettorefm wrote:
Zasterror wrote:I'm very surprised that Wade has the HIGHEST FT%! He usually sucks at clutch FTs nowadays but its good to see that he steps it up when it counts.

AND Wade scored the most points in an elimination game too??

.
Sorry, but I call BS on that. There are some things that you can't 'step up', and if you could, you'd do it every single game.
.
How do you suddenly turn a switch and start hitting 90% of your free throws when you're a 70% ft shooter? I doubt that Wade is lazy on regular season games and doesn't care about hitting them
.
It's just a statistical anomaly that people interpret as intention.
.
DIrk and Nash, on the other hand, have alwa been great FT shooters, so their numbers are just the mean. It's just like that Shaq comment "I'll hit it when it counts'', when criticized about so many FT bricks...
.
I mean, what's the difference? To me, not trying hard when it doesn't count shows he's a moron; and I doubt that you can suddenly turn into an elite FT shooter just because the pressure's on you
.
Players hit clutch shots because they have that in them. You don't see bad shooters hitting awesome shots very often. It's always great shooters that hit
those clutch shots - because they're ABLE TO.


I'll take the dude who's shooting FT's like a "moron" during the regular season, but making them when it counts on my team any day of the week.

You missed the point. Waded ft percentage in this limited sample is most likely an anomaly. If you looked at clutch FTs with any large sample, you will see regression to the mean, and you definitely won't see guys magically getting over 10% better. In short, "hitting em when they count" is bs.
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 14,658
And1: 5,791
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#194 » by bledredwine » Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:57 am

leolozon wrote:
bledredwine wrote:
busybluth22 wrote:Wow, that shooting % is amazing. You have to wonder what he & Nowitzki could have accomplished had he stayed in DAL.

It's not as amazing when you consider PPG. It's signicantly more difficult to average the same FG% at a 5+ ppg higher clip.


Yeah 65.9 TS% while scoring 20 points isn't that amazing :roll:... It must be why it has never been done by a guard during the regular season in the history of the NBA. It has been done by Barkely and Dantley, that's it (Artis Gilmore and Cedrix Maxwell are the closest after that). So I'm thinking these are pretty good numbers to have. Did you think before typing that ?

He averaged around 16 pts per game during those years, finding the next gear in these situations is a big plus. Not every great players do it as you can see in this thread. And that's also why championships, in themselves, are never indicative of a players' value. You have to look at how a player performed. If he performed above expectation, then it means his team was simply not good enough and it can't be held against said player.
. It's amazing shooting but doesn't mean he was an amazing scorer. The two other players who did it scored significantly more, which solidifies my point.
:o LeBron is 0-7 in game winning/tying FGs in the finals. And is 20/116 or 17% in game winning/tying FGs in the 4th/OT for his career. That's historically bad :o
NBA4EVA2010
Banned User
Posts: 478
And1: 180
Joined: Nov 04, 2010

Re: Clutchness in elimination games..stats of Jordan, Kobe.. 

Post#195 » by NBA4EVA2010 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:06 pm

I want to see one for Reggie Miller considering his clutch rep. I don't feel like looking them up right now though.

Return to The General Board