GrandAdmiralDan wrote:DukeH wrote:GrandAdmiralDan wrote:
In a shortsighted way, of course you do.
If given the options of either receiving a fish, or being taught how to fish, you'd probably take the fish...
And because we'd get upset that you took the fish, you'd accuse us of wanting you to go hungry...
I'd say you probably aren't very good at fishing and I'd rather learn it from somebody else.
Nice attempt, but that reply doesn't make much sense either. The options are receiving a fish or being taught (properly) how to fish. The parallel here is rebuilding through the draft and young asset acquisition. Hammond himself even recognizes that is the best way to do things, especially in the Bucks circumstances. Maybe he'd even be decent or even quite good at doing it that way. We'll likely never know. All we do know is that he has been terrible at executing the mandate he has been given by Kohl.
As far as "fishing" goes, I'll put my "fishing" methods up against the Bucks anytime. The Bucks would be in much better shape over, especially over the last 7 years, than they have been. I'm confident most here would agree with that. Not sure how many of our readers. 75% at least. More likely 85%-90%+
Who's to say we aren't building through the draft and young assets? Sanders, Henson, Giannis, Knight, Middleton, Ersan (kinda), Udoh, Mayo (kinda). Butler is going to be the only old guy in the starting lineup. We aren't going to get a top 5 pick with this roster, but the idea is the same. Sanders, for example, would have been a top 10 pick in hindsight and who knows what Henson/Giannis will turn into. Saying the FO failed because they picked up Butler instead of a #28 pick is a little bit ridiculous.
If you were fishing, you'd be in the middle of the ocean looking for a great white instead of chasing more realistic goals.