GreenHat wrote:Arison took no gamble whatsoever. There is no way to lose money owning an NBA team. Literally every owner has made money on the team they have owned. Considering Arison got the team for free from his dad, there really is no risk of losing money. Every single owner would have taken the "risk" of signing the big 3.
Except when they didn't.
Chicago had a half assed attempt at liberating 2 max slots - in the end they only had 1.5 or so - and that's because Reinsdorf doesn't REALLY want to spend to win. The Bulls have been the most profitable team for a 10 year period, averaging something like 50 mil/season in profits. And they still didn't want to pay the tax.
NY tried to get under the cap, but by when Donnie Walsh was calling the shots, Isiah had already done too much damage, so they only had 1.5 or so max slots.
The Clippers had some room, but they still were the old Clippers. The last 2-3 years where they actually tried to compete won't erase my memories of the old Sterling.
The Nets had room, but they lacked the credibility (in regards to building a contender) that Riley brought. Since then, Prokhorov had proved he'll spend to win, even if not necessarily very smart.
The other about 25 teams were just content to sit and watch.
And that's when a guy who was already considered a potential 2nd GOAT was available.
So NO, most other owners did not take the risk.
Especially since this has been a 2-3 years plan, and it risked alienating your best player by not putting a good team around him for 2 years in a row.
By my calculations, there are a handful of owners willing to spend, only few of them are spending smart:
Spending smart:
- Arison
- Buss Sr
- The Spurs guy - well, not spending much, but they are a small market and yet they have been contenders for 15 years in a row
Spending meh:
- Cuban
- Prokhorov (could move up or down)
Spending stupid:
- Dolan
- probably Buss Jr
So Arison is pretty much by every metric you want a top 3 owner in this league.