emunney wrote:sneakerdust wrote:emunney wrote:Eh, I'm interested in re-litigating the Bledsoe thing. If there's evidence out there that we could have had Bledsoe if we'd just taken on Butler, I'd like to see it. I have an open mind. Hit me.
Until then, I will continue to believe the reasonable thing: that the Clippers were compelled to make the move because they got two shooters and good team players that will fit perfectly there, and that otherwise they would have waited for something better.
We got a 2nd owned by the Suns and a 2nd owned by the Clips. Instead we take Butler and Bledsoe let the Suns keep their pick and take the Clippers pick. The Suns now have no Butler contract and two 2nd round picks for Dudley. The Clips have the same as before. So the Clips still do it. Now we're only talking about us sweetening the pot a bit for the Suns.
How is that far fetched? Bledsoe on the open market was worth Dudley+Redick-2nd round pick - Bulter's contract. There plenty of room for conversation there. Everyone is wondering: did we actually have that conversation?
BTW since this is a Caron Butler trade this topic should be merged with the season ticket thread IMO.
Wait a minute. Here's what your re-imagined trade looks like.
From Bucks -- s&T'd Redick
To Bucks -- Butler, Bledsoe
From Clippers -- Butler, Bledsoe, 2nd round pick
To Clips -- Redick, Dudley
So far, everybody's happy. But wait.
From Suns -- Dudley
To Suns -- Clippers 2nd round pick (2015 protected, likely 2016)
Sweetening the pot a bit? You've removed their entire motivation to get involved. We would have to give them a significant asset. Dudley is a good player on a fair contract. Again, we were the only team in this equation that was compelled to act by forces outside our control. If the Suns couldn't get Bledsoe for Dudley, or an asset from us, they could still certainly do better than a distant 2nd round pick and 'sweetener'.
It's far-fetched because we did not have the ammo to land Bledsoe without doing one of the following things:
1) Trade Henson
2) Trade Giannis
3) Trade next year's pick
4) Absorb Deandre Jordan's contract
Some people might be willing to do one of those things. I'm not one of them. You could add a provisional 5 (Trade Ersan), if you can find a team willing to take him and give the Suns some young assets or picks. I didn't include Trade Sanders because it's an obvious non-starter.
I guess the Suns are just smarter than the rest of the league because as already stated Bledsoe netted Redick + Dudley + taking Butlers contract - 2nd round pick. your 1-4 are much more out there - especially #4 because Jordan is on the Clippers not the Suns
The only disadvantage the Bucks has is that they were weak at the SG spot the Clips wanted to pursue so they has to get another team involved cause apparently the Clips wanted more than one shooter. Thus the Suns.
If you dont want to give a lottery protected 2015 pick to the Suns or even a little more because Bledsoe isn't that good fine. But then your thesis also then claims the Suns are much smarter than you too.
Anyway you look at it the asset was available and was eventually sold at a price much lower than any of the scenarios you claim would have had to happen. This basically confirms the fact that everyone, including yourself just takes it for granted the Bucks are so incompetent that they would have to pay so much more to acquire an asset than any other team.













