Brapman wrote: And the Market rating is the stupidest of all. Everyone knows the Palace will be filled again as the team becomes more competitive.
ImHeisenberg wrote:That's my point, from a strictly quality of life stand point, those other cities have similar attributes to Detroit. They have good and bad areas, and cold winters. I can't see a benefit in the area beyond those significant cities, like LA, NY, or Chicago...
Just got around to looking at the whole article--Detroit is somehow listed as the second worst market in the NBA. I get that it's colder than many places, the city itself is horribly blighted, and that the Palace is in a ridiculous location. But the Detroit metro area is the 12th biggest in the US, there's good young talent on the team, a tradition of winning, and plenty of opportunity if the team is decent. No huge knocks in any of the articles' categories.
I can see giving us a pretty bad rank as a FA destination, but would a potential free agent really be twice as likely to go Cleveland or Toronto? The article gives them both more than double our score for market.