GOAT SF
Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,707
- And1: 489
- Joined: Sep 30, 2003
Re: GOAT SF
This is between Bird and Lebron. By the end of the day, it will be Lebron.
The Doctor is the rock solid 3rd.
Then, there is some space...
The Doctor is the rock solid 3rd.
Then, there is some space...
PC Board All Time Fantasy Draft:
PG Mark Price (92-94)
SG Manu Ginobili (05-07)
SF Larry Bird (84-86)
PF Horace Grant (93-95)
C Dwight Howard (09-11)
+
Bernard King (82-84) Vlade Divac (95-97) Derek Harper (88-90) Dan Majerle (91-93) Josh Smith (10-12)
PG Mark Price (92-94)
SG Manu Ginobili (05-07)
SF Larry Bird (84-86)
PF Horace Grant (93-95)
C Dwight Howard (09-11)
+
Bernard King (82-84) Vlade Divac (95-97) Derek Harper (88-90) Dan Majerle (91-93) Josh Smith (10-12)
Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,647
- And1: 5,782
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: GOAT SF
Offensively, Bird. Overall, Lebron.


Re: GOAT SF
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,700
- And1: 854
- Joined: Nov 04, 2012
-
Re: GOAT SF
RayBan-Sematra wrote:I still have Bird for Career & Peak.
Lebron is great but people forget all those years he disappointed in elimination (2013 was no exception).
He can probably surpass Bird in the next 2-3 years though.
Bird's dissapointments, just a peak in all the lost series Birds average plummeted with 5ppg or more:
1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
1982: 17.2 in the Conf semis, 18.3 ppg in the Conference Finals, C's lost.
1985: 20.8 in the conf Finals, 23.8 ppg in the Finals, C's lost (he averaged 28 in the RS and 30 in the first two rounds).
1988: 19.8 ppg on 35% shooting in the conference finals, C's lost.
1991: 13.4 ppg on 38% shooting in the conf semis, C's lost.
1992: 11.8 ppg in the conf semis, C's lost.
Unless you mean something else with dissapointments.
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,163
- And1: 164
- Joined: Oct 19, 2010
Re: GOAT SF
Mazter wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:I still have Bird for Career & Peak.
Lebron is great but people forget all those years he disappointed in elimination (2013 was no exception).
He can probably surpass Bird in the next 2-3 years though.
Bird's dissapointments, just a peak in all the lost series Birds average plummeted with 5ppg or more:
1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
1982: 17.2 in the Conf semis, 18.3 ppg in the Conference Finals, C's lost.
1985: 20.8 in the conf Finals, 23.8 ppg in the Finals, C's lost (he averaged 28 in the RS and 30 in the first two rounds).
1988: 19.8 ppg on 35% shooting in the conference finals, C's lost.
1991: 13.4 ppg on 38% shooting in the conf semis, C's lost.
1992: 11.8 ppg in the conf semis, C's lost.
Unless you mean something else with dissapointments.
People really forget how bad bird choked back in his day.Lebron worst performance is significantly better than most of bird worst.
Re: GOAT SF
- DHodgkins
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,375
- And1: 972
- Joined: Jun 27, 2013
-
Re: GOAT SF
I can't how you guys are putting Lebron over Bird & Doc when the man himself said that they are better than him
GTGTPWTW
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 99
- And1: 2
- Joined: May 23, 2013
Re: GOAT SF
Still Larry for me but Lebron might surpass him.
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 862
- And1: 154
- Joined: Jan 01, 2013
Re: GOAT SF
1. Larry
2. LeBron
3. Durant
4. Doc J
5. Pippen
I lean toawards Durant over Irving, but I understand someone thinking opposite of that.
2. LeBron
3. Durant
4. Doc J
5. Pippen
I lean toawards Durant over Irving, but I understand someone thinking opposite of that.
Re: GOAT SF
- MisterHibachi
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,657
- And1: 19,075
- Joined: Oct 06, 2013
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: GOAT SF
Durant is being way over rated. He is not the 3rd best small forward ever.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
Re: GOAT SF
- MaliBrah
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,076
- And1: 4,598
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
-
Re: GOAT SF
INKtastic wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:I still have Bird for Career & Peak.
Lebron is great but people forget all those years he disappointed in elimination (2013 was no exception).
Isn't LeBron the all time NBA career leader in elimination game ppg?
also all time leader in game 7 ppg IIRC
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,071
- And1: 464
- Joined: Dec 27, 2004
- Location: DC
Re: GOAT SF
I go with LeBron here but he needs to punish teams in big series, instead of losing confidence and looking lost like Ben Wallace when dared to shoot open jumpshots.
Re: GOAT SF
- Rasho_libre
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,274
- And1: 1,252
- Joined: Dec 27, 2012
Re: GOAT SF
Brenice wrote:I go with LeBron here but he needs to punish teams in big series, instead of losing confidence and looking lost like Ben Wallace when dared to shoot open jumpshots.
Ben Wallace never dropped 37 points in game 7 when dared to shoot "jump shots".
Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,540
- And1: 1,231
- Joined: Dec 13, 2003
- Location: Surprise AZ
- Contact:
-
Re: GOAT SF
Mazter wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:I still have Bird for Career & Peak.
Lebron is great but people forget all those years he disappointed in elimination (2013 was no exception).
He can probably surpass Bird in the next 2-3 years though.
Bird's dissapointments, just a peak in all the lost series Birds average plummeted with 5ppg or more:
1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
1982: 17.2 in the Conf semis, 18.3 ppg in the Conference Finals, C's lost.
1985: 20.8 in the conf Finals, 23.8 ppg in the Finals, C's lost (he averaged 28 in the RS and 30 in the first two rounds).
1988: 19.8 ppg on 35% shooting in the conference finals, C's lost.
1991: 13.4 ppg on 38% shooting in the conf semis, C's lost.
1992: 11.8 ppg in the conf semis, C's lost.
Unless you mean something else with dissapointments.
If scoring is all that matters then Elgin Baylor and Rick Barry might be better than LBJ. Saying the Celtics won without thanks to Bird when the guy avged almost a triple double on a team that won 27 games the yr before is quite sad.
Not sure the Heat could win 1 game vs most of the teams that beat Birds Celtics. Have those series were after Bird was injured. If Bird had Derrick Rose and LBJs heart then he wouldnt have been playing in 88 playoffs and retired before 91 or 92.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
Re: GOAT SF
- INKtastic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 23,259
- And1: 5,027
- Joined: May 26, 2003
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: GOAT SF
bledredwine wrote:Offensively, Bird. Overall, Lebron.
sure, if you ignore the fact LeBron has a better scoring average, averages more assists (both while playing at a far lower pace than Bird), has a better TS%, a better eFG%. And overlook that LeBron's raw FG% last year was better than Bird's career average TS%. Either Birds offense gets way overrated or LeBron's gets way underrated.
The advanced offensive stats have LeBron over Bird by a mile. And the gaps only widen in the playoffs.
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
Re: GOAT SF
- INKtastic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 23,259
- And1: 5,027
- Joined: May 26, 2003
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: GOAT SF
Warspite wrote:Mazter wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:I still have Bird for Career & Peak.
Lebron is great but people forget all those years he disappointed in elimination (2013 was no exception).
He can probably surpass Bird in the next 2-3 years though.
Bird's dissapointments, just a peak in all the lost series Birds average plummeted with 5ppg or more:
1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
1982: 17.2 in the Conf semis, 18.3 ppg in the Conference Finals, C's lost.
1985: 20.8 in the conf Finals, 23.8 ppg in the Finals, C's lost (he averaged 28 in the RS and 30 in the first two rounds).
1988: 19.8 ppg on 35% shooting in the conference finals, C's lost.
1991: 13.4 ppg on 38% shooting in the conf semis, C's lost.
1992: 11.8 ppg in the conf semis, C's lost.
Unless you mean something else with dissapointments.
If scoring is all that matters then Elgin Baylor and Rick Barry might be better than LBJ. Saying the Celtics won without thanks to Bird when the guy avged almost a triple double on a team that won 27 games the yr before is quite sad.
Not sure the Heat could win 1 game vs most of the teams that beat Birds Celtics. Have those series were after Bird was injured. If Bird had Derrick Rose and LBJs heart then he wouldnt have been playing in 88 playoffs and retired before 91 or 92.
Cedric Maxwell did win finals MVP on a team with Bird, McHale, Parish against a sub .500 team that greatly benefited from round one being best 2 out of 3. That's sort of like Mario Chalmers winning finals MVP on the Heat.
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,647
- And1: 5,782
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: GOAT SF
INKtastic wrote:bledredwine wrote:Offensively, Bird. Overall, Lebron.
sure, if you ignore the fact LeBron has a better scoring average, averages more assists (both while playing at a far lower pace than Bird), has a better TS%, a better eFG%. And overlook that LeBron's raw FG% last year was better than Bird's career average TS%. Either Birds offense gets way overrated or LeBron's gets way underrated.
The advanced offensive stats have LeBron over Bird by a mile. And the gaps only widen in the playoffs.
You know what I didn't ignore?
That unlike Lebron, Bird didn't have a gaping hole in his offensive game that literally made teams leave him wide open to take midrange shots.
Much like KD, Bird was unguardable. Offensively, it's Bird > Lebron. Lebron's not even the best scorer in the league now.
Arguing efficiency is a joke. Lebron's efficiency only spiked when he joined the Heat and was allowed to let other players take over as 1 option. He never gets doubled. And his midrange percentage in the finals last time I checked for his CAREER was in the 20's. That's rancid.
At Bird's peak (pre-injury), he was a 28-29 PPG player with over .500 percentage on mostly midrange game. Clearly a superior offensive player, much like like Pippen's clearly a superior defensive player. That being said, overall I take Lebron.
PS> Did I mention that Bird could actually hit the vast majority of his free throws?


Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,540
- And1: 1,231
- Joined: Dec 13, 2003
- Location: Surprise AZ
- Contact:
-
Re: GOAT SF
INKtastic wrote:Warspite wrote:Mazter wrote:Bird's dissapointments, just a peak in all the lost series Birds average plummeted with 5ppg or more:
1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
1982: 17.2 in the Conf semis, 18.3 ppg in the Conference Finals, C's lost.
1985: 20.8 in the conf Finals, 23.8 ppg in the Finals, C's lost (he averaged 28 in the RS and 30 in the first two rounds).
1988: 19.8 ppg on 35% shooting in the conference finals, C's lost.
1991: 13.4 ppg on 38% shooting in the conf semis, C's lost.
1992: 11.8 ppg in the conf semis, C's lost.
Unless you mean something else with dissapointments.
If scoring is all that matters then Elgin Baylor and Rick Barry might be better than LBJ. Saying the Celtics won without thanks to Bird when the guy avged almost a triple double on a team that won 27 games the yr before is quite sad.
Not sure the Heat could win 1 game vs most of the teams that beat Birds Celtics. Have those series were after Bird was injured. If Bird had Derrick Rose and LBJs heart then he wouldnt have been playing in 88 playoffs and retired before 91 or 92.
Cedric Maxwell did win finals MVP on a team with Bird, McHale, Parish against a sub .500 team that greatly benefited from round one being best 2 out of 3. That's sort of like Mario Chalmers winning finals MVP on the Heat.
Differant time differant era. The Finals wasnt even on TV that yr. The writers voted the day before so they could get there stories done on the typewritters and then mailed into the office.
No role player will ever win another Finals MVP. It will always go to the best player on the winning team from now on. It wasnt always a star driven league in which the best player got 99% of the attention. What you are ignoring was that Maxwell was the MVP because his man was always double teaming Bird and Bird found him. Birds series in 81 was MVP worthy. 15ppg 15rpg 7apg is not a choke or a bad series. Parish was in foul trouble guarding Moses and McHale was a rookie 9th man who played 14mpg and only scored 28pts the entire series.
Maxwell was the 3rd leading scorer on that team so it would be more like Chris Bosh/Wade getting the Finals MVP.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,984
- And1: 31,089
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: GOAT SF
bledredwine wrote:INKtastic wrote:bledredwine wrote:Offensively, Bird. Overall, Lebron.
sure, if you ignore the fact LeBron has a better scoring average, averages more assists (both while playing at a far lower pace than Bird), has a better TS%, a better eFG%. And overlook that LeBron's raw FG% last year was better than Bird's career average TS%. Either Birds offense gets way overrated or LeBron's gets way underrated.
The advanced offensive stats have LeBron over Bird by a mile. And the gaps only widen in the playoffs.
You know what I didn't ignore?
That unlike Lebron, Bird didn't have a gaping hole in his offensive game that literally made teams leave him wide open to take midrange shots.
Much like KD, Bird was unguardable. Offensively, it's Bird > Lebron. Lebron's not even the best scorer in the league now.
Arguing efficiency is a joke. Lebron's efficiency only spiked when he joined the Heat and was allowed to let other players take over as 1 option. He never gets doubled. And his midrange percentage in the finals last time I checked for his CAREER was in the 20's. That's rancid.
At Bird's peak (pre-injury), he was a 28-29 PPG player with over .500 percentage on mostly midrange game. Clearly a superior offensive player, much like like Pippen's clearly a superior defensive player. That being said, overall I take Lebron.
PS> Did I mention that Bird could actually hit the vast majority of his free throws?
LOL, so there is no objective measure by which Bird is a better offensive player than Lebron but you'll still take him because you like that he scores more on jumpers? Why does it matter how Lebron scores if he scores more on better efficiency in the RS and PS? By all regular stats and advanced stats, Lebron crushes Bird.
Is it a weakness for Bird in comparison to Lebron that teams play him tight? Disrespecting his driving ability in relation to his shooting ability? Why is it a weakness for Lebron the other way around?
Re: GOAT SF
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,984
- And1: 31,089
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: GOAT SF
And lol at Lebron never getting doubled. Did you miss the finals where Green literally left Wade alone to double on Lebron?
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,707
- And1: 489
- Joined: Sep 30, 2003
Re: GOAT SF
Mazter wrote:1981: 15.3 ppg in the Finals, they still won, but not thanks to him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDk9y0Vul5A

What an utter disappointment. Surely, his team didn't "thank" him anything.

PC Board All Time Fantasy Draft:
PG Mark Price (92-94)
SG Manu Ginobili (05-07)
SF Larry Bird (84-86)
PF Horace Grant (93-95)
C Dwight Howard (09-11)
+
Bernard King (82-84) Vlade Divac (95-97) Derek Harper (88-90) Dan Majerle (91-93) Josh Smith (10-12)
PG Mark Price (92-94)
SG Manu Ginobili (05-07)
SF Larry Bird (84-86)
PF Horace Grant (93-95)
C Dwight Howard (09-11)
+
Bernard King (82-84) Vlade Divac (95-97) Derek Harper (88-90) Dan Majerle (91-93) Josh Smith (10-12)
Re: GOAT SF
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 12,664
- And1: 8,304
- Joined: Feb 24, 2013
-
Re: GOAT SF
ThunderDan9 wrote:This is between Bird and Lebron. By the end of the day, it will be Lebron.
Agree. At this point I still give it to Bird, but I suspect I'll be saying different after just one more season.
ThunderDan9 wrote:The Doctor is the rock solid 3rd.
Agree again.
ThunderDan9 wrote:Then, there is some space...
Agree a third time. imo, you can't really have Pippen as a voting option without also including Baylor and Havlicek.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire