ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays after A's Anderson?

Moderator: JaysRule15

dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,306
And1: 14,333
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#1 » by dagger » Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:44 pm

Interesting notion except that he's a serial injury, probably more of an injury risk than Josh Johnson. But we do get a group rate on elbow surgeries, so maybe it's not such a risk. If we sign or acquire enough guys with a high risk of re-injury, one of them is bound to pan out, right?

http://www.bluebirdbanter.com/2013/10/1 ... t-anderson
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 69,970
And1: 33,834
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#2 » by Fairview4Life » Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:04 am

Starting pitcher with an injury risk you say? Go on......

Image
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 647
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#3 » by Graham's Cracker » Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:20 am

Speaking of elbow injuries. I have a gut feeling that AA will pursue Gavin Floyd as well. Obviously, nothing guaranteed since he likely won't be back until after the all-star break. However, he seems like a guy that AA has always been after and I could see AA acquiring him as an insurance policy late in the year.
User avatar
Dan2087
2016 "Beat The Commish" Champion
Posts: 6,164
And1: 5,122
Joined: Mar 21, 2012
     

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#4 » by Dan2087 » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:56 am

If we get enough injury plagued pitchers, eventually a handful of them will be able to pitch for most of the season. Maybe we should go with an 8 man rotation to ease their workload
Image
User avatar
MikeM
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 9,897
Joined: Aug 10, 2006

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#5 » by MikeM » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:49 pm

It would be another shot in the dark at an ace pitcher, something AA loves. Something that will most likely fail. Rather have 5 Mark Buehrles.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,537
And1: 16,673
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#6 » by Lateral Quicks » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:09 pm

MikeM wrote:It would be another shot in the dark at an ace pitcher, something AA loves. Something that will most likely fail. Rather have 5 Mark Buehrles.


I would rather have no Mark Buehrles, at least at his current salary.

I'd say the Jays already have enough wild cards (Does Dickey return to Cy Young form? Does Morrow give you 150+ innings of 2012 form? Do one or more of Hutchison, Nolin, and Stroman prove to be capable major league starters? etc.) If they bring in another starter, it should be someone with a decent track record who has a better than average chance of not getting injured for a good chunk of the season.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
mikero
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,303
And1: 1
Joined: May 05, 2009

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#7 » by mikero » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:11 pm

I would take a chance on Anderson.

Realistically, how many low injury risk pitchers are available that can pitch in the AL East? The only ones available in free agency are Kuroda and possibly Tanaka.
User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#8 » by Nolan » Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:06 am

When he's not on the DL he's solid, but he spends a lot of time on the DL. The last thing we need is another pitcher we can't count on.
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,436
And1: 17,970
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#9 » by Schad » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:33 am

The problem is his salary. $8m is a lot of money for a flier on a guy who, over the past four seasons, has averaged the innings total of a reliever. We have holes that need filling.
Image
**** your asterisk.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,040
And1: 2,908
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#10 » by spykelee » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:21 am

Schadenfreude wrote:The problem is his salary. $8m is a lot of money for a flier on a guy who, over the past four seasons, has averaged the innings total of a reliever. We have holes that need filling.


Ya. Put me on the no thanks bandwagon. Way too many question marks for way too much money.
mikero
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,303
And1: 1
Joined: May 05, 2009

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#11 » by mikero » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:59 pm

It's not like Anderson's had shoulder issues or any recurring health problems though. He had TJ and then a stress fracture in his foot. $8 million is a lot but he only needs to pitch half a season to be worth 2 WAR.

I agree C and 2b are more important. But at the same time, the Jays aren't signing McCann or Cano and there's not a lot of teams that are willing to trade those premium position players.
User avatar
Wally West
Starter
Posts: 2,312
And1: 329
Joined: Jun 30, 2008

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#12 » by Wally West » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:11 pm

We've definitely got to do something about our catching position before we can worry about our starting rotation. If we head into next season as Arencibia as our starting catcher, AA should definitely be in a hot seat. Pretty much every team in the playoffs this year has a suitable defensive catcher whether average or above average.

With that being said, I'm skeptical about what type of prospect package AA would have to give up to acquire Brett Anderson. When healthy, this guy has some serious talent but we already have another talented injury prone starter in Morrow. Can we afford to have two starters in our rotation next year where we have absolutely no clue how many innings they're going to give us?
Want: Trae Young, Michael Porter Jr., DeAndre Ayton, Jaren Jackson Jr, Marvin Bagley III, Mohamad Bamba, Shai Gilgeous- Alexander, Elie Okobo, Jevon Carter
Wo1verine
2015 Beat the Commish Champion
Posts: 17,585
And1: 11,768
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
     

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#13 » by Wo1verine » Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:35 pm

Phillips is going to be shopped and traded this winter.. What are the chances we could take on his contract?

The Reds decided a month ago that they will shop Brandon Phillips this winter and intend to trade him, according to Bob Nightengale of USA Today (via Twitter). While there are several contending clubs with questions at second base to address this offseason, finding an attractive deal for Phillips could prove to be challenging.


Didn't AA have interest in him before?
Image
BrunoSkull
User avatar
Santoki
General Manager
Posts: 7,813
And1: 2,635
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#14 » by Santoki » Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:28 pm

mikero wrote:It's not like Anderson's had shoulder issues or any recurring health problems though. He had TJ and then a stress fracture in his foot. $8 million is a lot but he only needs to pitch half a season to be worth 2 WAR.

I agree C and 2b are more important. But at the same time, the Jays aren't signing McCann or Cano and there's not a lot of teams that are willing to trade those premium position players.


I'm not anti-stats but at what point do we stop worrying about guys value through WAR if he can only pitch half a damn season?!
Mehar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,379
And1: 2,882
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#15 » by Mehar » Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:51 pm

blackflash234 wrote:We've definitely got to do something about our catching position before we can worry about our starting rotation. If we head into next season as Arencibia as our starting catcher, AA should definitely be in a hot seat. Pretty much every team in the playoffs this year has a suitable defensive catcher whether average or above average.

With that being said, I'm skeptical about what type of prospect package AA would have to give up to acquire Brett Anderson. When healthy, this guy has some serious talent but we already have another talented injury prone starter in Morrow. Can we afford to have two starters in our rotation next year where we have absolutely no clue how many innings they're going to give us?


Agree with everything you say. AA should be in the hot seat if he does not upgrade the Catching Position, and trades for an another injury prone starter. This team can not afford an another injury prone starter if it is serious about contending in 2014. We do not need an another Brandon Morrow.
dballislife
RealGM
Posts: 14,416
And1: 5,491
Joined: Jan 24, 2010

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#16 » by dballislife » Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:59 pm

just think about this, this guy is more injured than morrow
User avatar
Homer Jay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 674
Joined: Nov 30, 2003

Re: Jays after A's Anderson? 

Post#17 » by Homer Jay » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:27 am

We take Phillips but only as a pure salary dump. They can have Kawasaki and one of Drabek/Hutch/Nolin.
Image

Return to Toronto Blue Jays