Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

Expeditious
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 21
Joined: Oct 05, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#121 » by Expeditious » Fri Oct 25, 2013 12:16 pm

SlowPaced wrote:
GC Pantalones wrote:
MikeLowrey wrote:
What? This next draft is too deep and top heavy talented to know who'll be 1/who will emerge. And the majority consensus is that Wiggins is that guy.

What a ludicrous statement, as good as Parker is. (Think he's number 2)

Randle is the only other one in the discussion and his game screams less athletic Derrick Williams. I'll pass.


Randle is a miles better shooter than Derrick Williams and can hit a three. That's why I think he won't be a tweener.


Derrick Williams shot 57% on threes his last year in college. He didn't take a bunch (~2/game), but that's really impressive, even if it was fluky (and most people knew it was at the time).

I'll eat my shoe if Randle sniffs 40% from behind the arc. And I pray Randle doesn't take two a game.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,566
And1: 7,497
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#122 » by Crazy-Canuck » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:35 pm

Part of the problem is that people who have never really seen him play are expecting this LeBron/Durant type offensive maestro. He isnt that type of player nor will he ever really be that type of player. This was a kid with nothing but hops and a broke jumper 2 years ago. he has made some huge strides to even get to where he is right now.

Wiggins can dominate defensively from the wing spot and has shown some serious growth on the offensive end the last few years.
FecesOfDeath
Head Coach
Posts: 6,116
And1: 1,686
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#123 » by FecesOfDeath » Sat Oct 26, 2013 4:10 am

Ender's game has time to improve before Ender's Game comes out in theaters.
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#124 » by Knighthonor » Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:32 am

Rasho_libre wrote:The only people in for dissapointment are the ones expecting he to be next coming of Lebron. I don't know if people remember Lebron coming in. People need to temper expectations for wiggins, especially day 1 expectations.

what was lebron like coming in?
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#125 » by LloydFree » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:30 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:Part of the problem is that people who have never really seen him play are expecting this LeBron/Durant type offensive maestro. He isnt that type of player nor will he ever really be that type of player. This was a kid with nothing but hops and a broke jumper 2 years ago. he has made some huge strides to even get to where he is right now.

Wiggins can dominate defensively from the wing spot and has shown some serious growth on the offensive end the last few years.


I don't expect Wiggins to be another Lebron, because there is never going to be another Lebron James. James is on another planet physically. But those who keep saying 'Wiggins has nothing but hops' aren't paying enough attention to what they are watching.
Andrew Wiggins has a post-up game like an NBA player already. He can finish with both his left and right hand. And he has enough handle and quickness, to get to any spot on the court. You won't see his post game in college, because wings don't do that in college ball against zone defense. You won't see a lot of him breaking down the defense, because the guards dominate the ball in college. Jump shooters dominate college basketball. That isn't his game.

I saw Lebron James live, as a HS player in 2003, and I saw Kobe Bryant live, as a HS player, in '96. From the video I've seen, Wiggins is not the 'Man amongst boys' that Lebron James was, but he does EVERYTHING as well as Kobe Bryant did at that stage. It's all about the work. If he works and improves his game he will be great, if not, he won't.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Big_C_KU
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 106
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#126 » by Big_C_KU » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:11 pm

Bill Self said today in his weekly press conference that the last week Wiggins has begun to figure out and understand some things including giving more effort all the time. KU's first exhibition game is tomorrow. Hoping to have highlights from game.
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#127 » by ManualRam » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:59 pm

LloydFree wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Part of the problem is that people who have never really seen him play are expecting this LeBron/Durant type offensive maestro. He isnt that type of player nor will he ever really be that type of player. This was a kid with nothing but hops and a broke jumper 2 years ago. he has made some huge strides to even get to where he is right now.

Wiggins can dominate defensively from the wing spot and has shown some serious growth on the offensive end the last few years.


Wiggins is not the 'Man amongst boys' that Lebron James was, but he does EVERYTHING as well as Kobe Bryant did at that stage.

no he doesn't. kobe had an amazing skill level for a prep. wiggins does not.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#128 » by LloydFree » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:24 am

ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Part of the problem is that people who have never really seen him play are expecting this LeBron/Durant type offensive maestro. He isnt that type of player nor will he ever really be that type of player. This was a kid with nothing but hops and a broke jumper 2 years ago. he has made some huge strides to even get to where he is right now.

Wiggins can dominate defensively from the wing spot and has shown some serious growth on the offensive end the last few years.


Wiggins is not the 'Man amongst boys' that Lebron James was, but he does EVERYTHING as well as Kobe Bryant did at that stage.

no he doesn't. kobe had an amazing skill level for a prep. wiggins does not.

I don't know your experience watching Kobe in HS. I saw him many times. LIVE. Kobe couldn't dribble with his leftnhand, and he surely couldn't finish with his left hand. He couldn't shoot jumpers any better than Wiggins either. Don't re-write history.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#129 » by ManualRam » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:37 am

LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Wiggins is not the 'Man amongst boys' that Lebron James was, but he does EVERYTHING as well as Kobe Bryant did at that stage.

no he doesn't. kobe had an amazing skill level for a prep. wiggins does not.

I don't know your experience watching Kobe in HS. I saw him many times. LIVE. Kobe couldn't dribble with his leftnhand, and he surely couldn't finish with his left hand. He couldn't shoot jumpers any better than Wiggins either. Don't re-write history.

im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#130 » by LloydFree » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:57 am

ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:no he doesn't. kobe had an amazing skill level for a prep. wiggins does not.

I don't know your experience watching Kobe in HS. I saw him many times. LIVE. Kobe couldn't dribble with his leftnhand, and he surely couldn't finish with his left hand. He couldn't shoot jumpers any better than Wiggins either. Don't re-write history.

im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#131 » by ManualRam » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:39 am

LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't know your experience watching Kobe in HS. I saw him many times. LIVE. Kobe couldn't dribble with his leftnhand, and he surely couldn't finish with his left hand. He couldn't shoot jumpers any better than Wiggins either. Don't re-write history.

im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.

kg WAS a better prospect than kobe because he had his incredible skill at 6'11+.

and yes kobe was extremely skilled in HS. he didn't just transform himself into a skilled player as a pro. his skill level is what separated him from the pack as a wing prospect. he wasn't just some toolsy athletic freak. he had the perfect combination of athleticism, feel for the game, competitiveness AND skill, skill that he developed at an earlier age than most elite level american prospects because of how he grew up. he practiced and played against pros growing up. developed footwork from playing soccer. grew up overseas learning the fundamentals where the emphasis at an early age is/was on skill-building and footwork as opposed to playing game after game after game. he grew up studying tape religiously, mimicking and incorporating into his game the moves of the greats. all that culminated in him having a high skill level for his age.

he had a good a handle for a wing, combining fundamental with the street handle (sometimes over the top with the carries) that he picked up when he went back to the states during summers. even with a weaker left, he had the shakes and crosses. he could use it to create space for his jumper and dribble through traffic. his handle and, believe it or not, his passing ability led scouts to believe that he could possibly also play the point as a pro or at least reprise g.hill's role. he had some sloppiness that stemmed from trying to do too much, like dribbling through triples or taking on entire defenses (which was one of his weaknesses earlier on in his NBA career), but he had a handle. combine that with his shooting ability, his incredible footwork for a kid his age, creativity around the rim, ability to generate his shot from anywhere on the floor and you get a kid who's skill level is much greater than what wiggins has now.

i can play the same card you're playing. you just repeating that wiggins' skill is on the level with prep kobe doesn't make it true. i don't think their skills levels at the same stage are close. i don't even think it's really worth debating but i did anyway, mainly bc it was kinda shocking to even read that statement.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#132 » by LloydFree » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:42 pm

ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.

kg WAS a better prospect than kobe because he had his incredible skill at 6'11+.

and yes kobe was extremely skilled in HS. he didn't just transform himself into a skilled player as a pro. his skill level is what separated him from the pack as a wing prospect. he wasn't just some toolsy athletic freak. he had the perfect combination of athleticism, feel for the game, competitiveness AND skill, skill that he developed at an earlier age than most elite level american prospects because of how he grew up. he practiced and played against pros growing up. developed footwork from playing soccer. grew up overseas learning the fundamentals where the emphasis at an early age is/was on skill-building and footwork as opposed to playing game after game after game. he grew up studying tape religiously, mimicking and incorporating into his game the moves of the greats. all that culminated in him having a high skill level for his age.

he had a good a handle for a wing, combining fundamental with the street handle (sometimes over the top with the carries) that he picked up when he went back to the states during summers. even with a weaker left, he had the shakes and crosses. he could use it to create space for his jumper and dribble through traffic. his handle and, believe it or not, his passing ability led scouts to believe that he could possibly also play the point as a pro or at least reprise g.hill's role. he had some sloppiness that stemmed from trying to do too much, like dribbling through triples or taking on entire defenses (which was one of his weaknesses earlier on in his NBA career), but he had a handle. combine that with his shooting ability, his incredible footwork for a kid his age, creativity around the rim, ability to generate his shot from anywhere on the floor and you get a kid who's skill level is much greater than what wiggins has now.

i can play the same card you're playing. you just repeating that wiggins' skill is on the level with prep kobe doesn't make it true. i don't think their skills levels at the same stage are close. i don't even think it's really worth debating but i did anyway, mainly bc it was kinda shocking to even read that statement.


I appreciate you took the time to debate the point. I've read all that before about Kobe Bryant. His life has been chronicled a lot since he became a pro. Its very easy to say he had a great handle and great jumper in HS if you never saw him. NBA scouts missed alot of that too, when they were rating him no higher than 6th best prospect in '96.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#133 » by ManualRam » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:48 pm

LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.

kg WAS a better prospect than kobe because he had his incredible skill at 6'11+.

and yes kobe was extremely skilled in HS. he didn't just transform himself into a skilled player as a pro. his skill level is what separated him from the pack as a wing prospect. he wasn't just some toolsy athletic freak. he had the perfect combination of athleticism, feel for the game, competitiveness AND skill, skill that he developed at an earlier age than most elite level american prospects because of how he grew up. he practiced and played against pros growing up. developed footwork from playing soccer. grew up overseas learning the fundamentals where the emphasis at an early age is/was on skill-building and footwork as opposed to playing game after game after game. he grew up studying tape religiously, mimicking and incorporating into his game the moves of the greats. all that culminated in him having a high skill level for his age.

he had a good a handle for a wing, combining fundamental with the street handle (sometimes over the top with the carries) that he picked up when he went back to the states during summers. even with a weaker left, he had the shakes and crosses. he could use it to create space for his jumper and dribble through traffic. his handle and, believe it or not, his passing ability led scouts to believe that he could possibly also play the point as a pro or at least reprise g.hill's role. he had some sloppiness that stemmed from trying to do too much, like dribbling through triples or taking on entire defenses (which was one of his weaknesses earlier on in his NBA career), but he had a handle. combine that with his shooting ability, his incredible footwork for a kid his age, creativity around the rim, ability to generate his shot from anywhere on the floor and you get a kid who's skill level is much greater than what wiggins has now.

i can play the same card you're playing. you just repeating that wiggins' skill is on the level with prep kobe doesn't make it true. i don't think their skills levels at the same stage are close. i don't even think it's really worth debating but i did anyway, mainly bc it was kinda shocking to even read that statement.


I appreciate you took the time to debate the point. I've read all that before about Kobe Bryant. His life has been chronicled a lot since he became a pro. Its very easy to say he had a great handle and great jumper in HS if you never saw him. NBA scouts missed alot of that too, when they were rating him no higher than 6th best prospect in '96.


the only reason kobe was rated and subsequently taken where he was was because nba people were apprehensive about preps to pros guards at that time. preps to pros was still a new concept, kg being the only recent one prior to kobe with no guard ever being selected out of HS. he was still the highest rated player in a very good HS class, sweeping all the HS individual awards and blowing scouts away in workouts, both during his senior season (he scrimmaged and trained with the 6ers) and during the pre-draft stuff. teams were also scared that kobe would not play for them if selected, which knocked him down a peg too.

it's funny how a kid who supposedly did not have a great handle was entrusted to run the point for a playoff caliber team (yes, he did play back up point) his rookie yr in the NBA. a high school kid who didn't have a great jumper for his age could shoot 38% from nba 3 his rookie yr. he didn't exactly develop those skills overnight. can you imagine wiggins running the point in the nba or shooting 38% from 3 as soon as this yr? i know i cant. wiggins, with his handle, will have to work his way into being the secondary ball-handler for KU this yr. kobe was entrusted with the ball in his hands over the likes of byron scott, while wiggins has to prove that he should have the ball in his hands over...naadir tharpe?
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
User avatar
rockmanslim
RealGM
Posts: 11,817
And1: 7,243
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#134 » by rockmanslim » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:34 pm

I never saw Kobe play live in HS, but I do watch youtube videos :D

Kobe in summer league prior to his rookie season:
Spoiler:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0M0Hmy_78E[/youtube]


small sample size, highlight video bias, summer league comp, blah blah blah all the usual disclaimers, but just from that he looks skilled to me even then. probably even more skilled than guys like current durant, current p. george, even current harden.
click

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013


Image
User avatar
Young_Buc
General Manager
Posts: 9,638
And1: 9,130
Joined: Aug 26, 2003
Location: Puff Daddy's House
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#135 » by Young_Buc » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:17 pm

LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't know your experience watching Kobe in HS. I saw him many times. LIVE. Kobe couldn't dribble with his leftnhand, and he surely couldn't finish with his left hand. He couldn't shoot jumpers any better than Wiggins either. Don't re-write history.

im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.


Llyod Free is correct Garnett was a MUCH better prospect than Kobe at the HS level. Believe it or not so was McGrady. Kobe was a dunker in high school. People openly questioned him going into the draft as most believed he wasn't ready. (And he wasn't)

Wiggins is a better HS prospect than Kobe. Without his work ethic, Kobe is gerald green.
Image
User avatar
Young_Buc
General Manager
Posts: 9,638
And1: 9,130
Joined: Aug 26, 2003
Location: Puff Daddy's House
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#136 » by Young_Buc » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:19 pm

Young_Buc wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.


Llyod Free is correct Garnett was a MUCH better prospect than Kobe at the HS level. Believe it or not so was McGrady Lamar Odom was better than both (!!!!!). Kobe was a dunker in high school. People openly questioned him going into the draft as most believed he wasn't ready. (And he wasn't)

Wiggins is a better HS prospect than Kobe. Without his work ethic, Kobe is gerald green.
Image
Big_C_KU
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 106
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#137 » by Big_C_KU » Tue Oct 29, 2013 6:32 pm

Wiggins is similar to Kobe and McGrady in high school. Like them he's great athletically but skill wise there's nothing he's great at right now. In all the areas you have to work at with practice and repetition (skill) Wiggins is solid to good but no area is he great at anything right now. He's an average shooter, has good handles, rebounds well but not great, good defender, finishes well, and an ok passer. LeBron was great in damn near every area entering the NBA except shooting. Kobe and McGrady weren't great in really any area and that's why they didn't start right away. Wiggins is similar to Kobe and McGrady in that regard. If Wiggins has the natural ability and solid skill set now. If he doesn't get distracted and works to improve his skills then he'll be great.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#138 » by HeartBreakKid » Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:21 pm

Wiggins has some nice footwork in those highlight videos.
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#139 » by ManualRam » Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:31 pm

Young_Buc wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
ManualRam wrote:im not. there is not 1 single offensive skill that wiggins is on par with prep kobe at. not shooting, handling, passing, shot creating or footwork. nothing.


It's very easy to say a player had attributes in the past, that they now possess. Kobe's greatest asset in HS was that he was explosive, and was determined to get to the rim at all costs. He did not posses all of the skills he has now.
Kobe Bryant was a great HS basketball player, but he wasn't thought to be the next Jordan back then. Kevin Garnett was a much better HS player than Kobe too. That is not a shot at Kobe. He worked on his skills, and passed everybody, but he was no more skilled than Wiggins back then. You just repeating that he was, doesn't make that a fact.


Llyod Free is correct Garnett was a MUCH better prospect than Kobe at the HS level. Believe it or not so was McGrady. Kobe was a dunker in high school. People openly questioned him going into the draft as most believed he wasn't ready. (And he wasn't)

Wiggins is a better HS prospect than Kobe. Without his work ethic, Kobe is gerald green.


yes, garnett was a better prospect.
debatable. kobe was far more accomplished and hyped, but mcgrady had similar skills at 6'8.
no, he wasn't just a dunker in HS. this is how i know you're just talking out of your ass.
yes, people questioned all preps to pros players back then.
no, wiggins doesn't come close to kobe's skill level.
no, kobe had that work ethic his entire life which lead to him developing skill at an earlier stage.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
User avatar
Young_Buc
General Manager
Posts: 9,638
And1: 9,130
Joined: Aug 26, 2003
Location: Puff Daddy's House
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#140 » by Young_Buc » Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:41 pm

[/quote]

yes, garnett was a better prospect.
debatable. kobe was far more accomplished and hyped, but mcgrady had similar skills at 6'8.
no, he wasn't just a dunker in HS. this is how i know you're just talking out of your ass.
yes, people questioned all preps to pros players back then.
no, wiggins doesn't come close to kobe's skill level.
no, kobe had that work ethic his entire life which lead to him developing skill at an earlier stage.[/quote]

Garnett wasn't just a better prospect, he was described as a 6'11 Penny Hardaway. (Penny being the player of choice at the moment) McGrady was a better defensive player, ball handler and passer at that stage (He also idolized Penny and patterned his game after him) Kobe was questioned for a variety of reasons aside from "They questioned all preps to pros" Mainly 1. He wasn't a hardship case 2. He was a 4.0 student 3. He had already verbally commited to Duke and 4. He was NOT looked upon as a generational talent like Garnett was. Kobe was the best prospect of that year and that's it. His handle wasn't as refined as it became in his second year (the year which he dramatically improved) nor was his shot.
Image

Return to NBA Draft