ImageImageImage

G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0)

Moderator: THE J0KER

eathb_au
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 1,118
Joined: May 30, 2010

G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#1 » by eathb_au » Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:15 pm

Image @ Image

Wednesday, October 30, 8:00 PM (MST) - TV: ALT

Image
ImageImageImageImageImage
BENCH: Kenneth Faried, Randy Foye, Nate Robinson, Anthony Randolph, Timofey Mozgov

Image
ImageImageImageImageImage
BENCH: Jason Thompson, Ben McLemore, Lub Mbah A Moute, Isaiah Thomas, Chuck Hayes

KEY MATCHUP:
ImageImage

INJURY REPORT:
Denver: Gallinari - ACL
L.A.: Landry - Hip
darivo
Sophomore
Posts: 124
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#2 » by darivo » Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:11 pm

Wilson chandler will be starter, i hope....


Edit: **** mobile keyboard
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,919
And1: 1,466
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#3 » by DaFan334 » Mon Oct 28, 2013 6:32 am

http://www.denverpost.com/nuggets/ci_24 ... -able-play
If Ty is out, who gets the start? Nate provides a spark, which might be better suited coming off the bench, but his offense may be needed with the starters.

Either way, I'm pretty stoked for the season to finally get under way.
Image
User avatar
pickaxe
Analyst
Posts: 3,696
And1: 66
Joined: Mar 22, 2007

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#4 » by pickaxe » Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:09 am

Amundson and Camby waived. Don't see an opening in current squad, but possible future configurations maybe. That is if Camby's got anything left in the tank. Just commenting because it seems an awful lot of well known names are being waived around the league not just those two. Usually it's just the unknowns getting a pass, but looks like there has been an overflow of talent on many teams this season.

Anyway, back to reality!
Image

put the ball in the basket like this
User avatar
pickaxe
Analyst
Posts: 3,696
And1: 66
Joined: Mar 22, 2007

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#5 » by pickaxe » Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:12 am

DaFan334 wrote:http://www.denverpost.com/nuggets/ci_24400251/nuggets-ty-lawson-may-not-be-able-play
If Ty is out, who gets the start? Nate provides a spark, which might be better suited coming off the bench, but his offense may be needed with the starters.

Either way, I'm pretty stoked for the season to finally get under way.


I'm the optimistic sort, so I would say run it with Nate and Fournier. Just cut to the chase: it's early, Evan needs a shot to step up, and when Ty is back just slide everyone around to where they've earned it or best fit.

*note that would be the more adventurous take on the starting lineup
Image

put the ball in the basket like this
eathb_au
Analyst
Posts: 3,377
And1: 1,118
Joined: May 30, 2010

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#6 » by eathb_au » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:45 pm

Fwiw I expect the starters to be Lawson/Nate-Foye-Randolph-Hickson-McGee

Putting Fournier was more of hope. Wasn't happy with the Foye signing, even less happy after his preseason. Would be okay with him if he just stood in the corner and shot 3s but he has a tendency to have to dribble and turn the ball over.
User avatar
cold_cowboy
Veteran
Posts: 2,835
And1: 2,220
Joined: Jul 21, 2013

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#7 » by cold_cowboy » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:16 pm

i'm not optimistic about this season's nuggets at all, but hey, at least the avs and broncos are killing it.
cammy118
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 18, 2013

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#8 » by cammy118 » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:00 pm

I hope we see Fournier get some decent PT, I think Shaw has been impressed with his ability to shoot. He could be a valuable swingman like Chandler was last year. I really hope lawson breaks out, a good game Wednesday and that could keep his momentum high for the early games.
RRFB
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,900
And1: 2,334
Joined: Dec 24, 2006
Location: Denver, CO

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#9 » by RRFB » Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:00 pm

How the hell does half of the team already have some type of muscle strain or bruise? And will Wilson Chandler EVER start a season healthy?

It's a good opportunity for some of the younger guys I guess, but it's not very encouraging to be limping into the season like this.
DaFan334
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,919
And1: 1,466
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#10 » by DaFan334 » Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:17 pm

Sounds like we will be without Ty, Foye and Chandler for this one now. The Post is reporting that Miller, Fournier and Randolph will start in their places. Hopefully the Kings haven't improved that much or we will struggle. This should at least be a good chance for Fournier to get some time and maybe work his way into the regular starting lineup.
Image
User avatar
Teens On Acid
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 67
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:
 

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#11 » by Teens On Acid » Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:52 am

DaFan334 wrote:Sounds like we will be without Ty, Foye and Chandler for this one now. The Post is reporting that Miller, Fournier and Randolph will start in their places. Hopefully the Kings haven't improved that much or we will struggle. This should at least be a good chance for Fournier to get some time and maybe work his way into the regular starting lineup.


Not mad at this at all. I'll take a few losses if it means playing time for these 3. The more early season experience they get, the better the last half of our season looks.
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,767
And1: 5,700
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#12 » by youngthegiant » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:07 am

Going to be a tough matchup, looks like were going to be without Lawson, Chandler and Foye. Rotation and minute distribution may end up looking like this.

Nate Robinson(32)/Andre Miller(16)
Evan Fournier(30)/Andre Miller(10)/Jordan Hamilton(8)
Anthony Randolph(25)/Quincy Miller(20)/Jordan Hamilton(3)
J.J Hickson(20)/Kenneth Faried(28)
Javale Mcgee(28)/Timofey Mozgov(12)/J.J Hickson(8)

Yikes.......
cammy118
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 18, 2013

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#13 » by cammy118 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:13 pm

I just don't see the logic of playing Miller over Hamilton. Hamilton is better in my opinion.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#14 » by The Rebel » Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:40 pm

cammy118 wrote:I just don't see the logic of playing Miller over Hamilton. Hamilton is better in my opinion.


Q. Miller is a much better defender than Hamilton is right now, what I do not understand is why Randolph is starting, personally I have not been all that impressed with the way he has looked so far, and having him out of position is not going to help his defense.
cammy118
Ballboy
Posts: 4
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 18, 2013

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#15 » by cammy118 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:29 pm

I just think Hamilton is a better scorer. With Fournier starting this team needs depth with that.
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#16 » by The Rebel » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:34 pm

cammy118 wrote:I just think Hamilton is a better scorer. With Fournier starting this team needs depth with that.


I agree if the minutes breakdown young the giant posted were going to be true I might question it, but it will more likely be A. Miller playing PG 30 minutes and Robinson getting 25 minutes or so off the bench, which will help with the scoring off the bench. Either way if the Kings have improved at all this could be a long night having so many guys out.
User avatar
CanNugget
Senior
Posts: 715
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
   

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#17 » by CanNugget » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:14 pm

Denver Nuggets ‏@denvernuggets 3m

#Nuggets coach Brian Shaw says he's optimistic PG Ty Lawson (groin strain) will play Wednesday at Sacramento.


Thank God..

He'll be starting along side Foye, Randolph, Hickson, and McGee. I fell like we'll be ok against them as long as Cousins doesn't beat the s**out of our frontline all night.
User avatar
pickaxe
Analyst
Posts: 3,696
And1: 66
Joined: Mar 22, 2007

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#18 » by pickaxe » Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:19 am

Yeah, I'm not at all enthusiastic about Randolph starting. We move Koufos so that we can start McGee only to play Randolph out of position at SF. There's something naggingly annoying about making a power move and then defeating it.

Without Chandler, Gallinari or Faried options are not very many.

Might as well play McGee, Mozgov, Hickson, SG, Lawson

At least Randolph's 6'11" so that gives the team considerable size 3-5
Image

put the ball in the basket like this
User avatar
pickaxe
Analyst
Posts: 3,696
And1: 66
Joined: Mar 22, 2007

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#19 » by pickaxe » Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:29 am

That being said, what does our bench look like???

Nate/Fournier, Miller, JHam/Arthur, Q. Miller, Mozgov
Image

put the ball in the basket like this
User avatar
Teens On Acid
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,604
And1: 67
Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:
 

Re: G1: Denver (0-0) @ Sacramento (0-0) 

Post#20 » by Teens On Acid » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:17 am

here we go!

Return to Denver Nuggets