WizarDynasty wrote:you can't have good rotations, when all your bench players are horrible.
And that's a roster problem.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
WizarDynasty wrote:you can't have good rotations, when all your bench players are horrible.

Spence wrote:WizarDynasty wrote:lost because we have no half court offense.
76ers scored 109 points tonight and 74 of them came in the paint. I think that probably had something to do with the loss.
Spence wrote:Have the Wizards ever had a coach that didn't have horrible player rotations, according to this forum?
I'm not trying to troll, that's a serious question.
Coach is hired. RealGM forum complains about his player rotations. Says coach sucks.
Team loses. Coach is fired.
New coach hired. RealGM forum complains about his player rotations. Says coach sucks.
Team loses. Coach is fired.
New new coach is hired...
Kinda odd that something that seems so easy and obvious to RealGM forum members seems to escape one lifelong basketball coach after another.
Or maybe the roster is inferior, the talent isn't there and this rotation or that rotation or any rotation isn't going to fix a bad roster.
thricethefun wrote:It's a pretty much guaranteed 0-3 start too with us playing in Miami next game and Miami having lost their last 2 games. I see us getting blown out in that one.
Spence wrote:I'm a little surprised everyone seems so surprised by these results. I just never saw how this was a good team. Maybe they'll make the playoffs, maybe they won't. But if they do, it's not likely to be because they're a good team. They're not. Right now they're not even close. They may improve over the course of the season -- they probably will -- but I just never understood the optimism around this team. It's going to get very ugly if things go badly this season.
Did anyone else notice the Wiz could get only 17K and change into their gym tonight? That's the home opener. And whatever was left with 3 minutes left was booing pretty consistently -- and correctly so. Despite all the ridiculous hype I think it's clear a lot of fans are not convinced. Nor should they be. Wizards fans suffer from PTSD. I'm amazed anyone is capable of optimism when it comes to this franchise. One day they'll be good. Maybe soon. But it seems crazy to me to anticipate something that is almost completely unprecedented at this point.
No matter how I turn that roster over in my head I can't see a good team.
dandridge 10 wrote:Just got back from the game and read some of the post in this thread. Couple of thoughts:
:: many great points::
Spence wrote:Have the Wizards ever had a coach that didn't have horrible player rotations, according to this forum?
I'm not trying to troll, that's a serious question.
Coach is hired. RealGM forum complains about his player rotations. Says coach sucks.
Team loses. Coach is fired.
New coach hired. RealGM forum complains about his player rotations. Says coach sucks.
Team loses. Coach is fired.
New new coach is hired...
Kinda odd that something that seems so easy and obvious to RealGM forum members seems to escape one lifelong basketball coach after another.
Or maybe the roster is inferior, the talent isn't there and this rotation or that rotation or any rotation isn't going to fix a bad roster.
hands11 wrote:D10
I agree with most of what you are saying.
But I would highlight the following.
The lead and burst in the 1st was all Wall. Other then him, the offense sucked. Booker got creamed by Thaddeus Young and he was not what the Wizards needed to help the offense get going. He made a few nice post moves if he did that for two games, teams would shut it down. He tried to be a key offensive player to start last year and it was awful.
So going into the 2nd, I expected they would struggle unless Wall could keep it going and Beal started to normalize.
First time I saw what looked like an offense is when they went to
Maynor, Webster, Trevor A, AH, and Kevin and they took a nice lead.
Then Randy changed the line up. Not sure to what, but they lost the lead soon after.
Spence wrote:long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:If this were the normal rotation, that would be one thing.
But he pulled him earlier than I've ever seen when he was hotter than I've ever seen.
WTF?
Witt pulled a Javale tonight. Just no feel for the game. But heck. What did we expect. Doesn't Witt have the worst w/l record in NBA history or close to it?
Wall said he asked to come out of the game. Stop blaming Wittman for things that are not his fault.
pancakes3 wrote:dandridge 10 wrote:Just got back from the game and read some of the post in this thread. Couple of thoughts:
:: many great points::
I think we armchair GM's get easily swept up in the details and miss the big picture flaws in favor of our pet theories. I think Dandridge's point about intensity is well taken. Sometimes that's all it really is - mental lapses. I also think the lack of a playmaker on the 2nd unit forcing us to rely on Harrington (basically an older Blatche) will cost us many games this year. However, I'll reserve judgement until Gortat has a couple weeks under his belt and we get Porter back. We're better than our record. It'll just take a couple growing-pain games to get there. The problem is that with a "max" player like Wall we shouldn't be having growing pain games. He certainly hasn't taken "the leap" like Westbrook and Rose had.