The Official NBA pic/gif thread part VII

Post #1121 » by **mopper8** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 2:43 am

MikeM wrote:
mopper8 wrote:
jc23 wrote:
oh my gosh, no he was in position to trip over andersons foot because anderson came up high for a pic and Rose jumped out to keep cole baseline.

Isn't this the definition of getting shook? He misread the play because Cole had a solid hesitation before the cross, and was out of position when Cole rejected the screen, leaving him wide open. That's getting shook.

It's sad how much trouble some fans are having dealing with such a small thing

^ doesn't understand defense.

LMAO, seriously? That wasn't even good "ICE"ing, which, yes, I understand just fine. The Bulls don't want Norris Cole attacking their big unimpeded, which is what Miami had before Rose tripped. You want to corral the ball-handler into the baseline, but that's not what happened on the play. Rose jumped early, because he bit on Cole's fake. That's getting shook. Period.

MikeM · Post #1122 » by **MikeM** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 2:58 am

mopper8 wrote:
MikeM wrote:
mopper8 wrote:
Isn't this the definition of getting shook? He misread the play because Cole had a solid hesitation before the cross, and was out of position when Cole rejected the screen, leaving him wide open. That's getting shook.

It's sad how much trouble some fans are having dealing with such a small thing

^ doesn't understand defense.

LMAO, seriously? That wasn't even good "ICE"ing, which, yes, I understand just fine. The Bulls don't want Norris Cole attacking their big unimpeded, which is what Miami had before Rose tripped. You want to corral the ball-handler into the baseline, but that's not what happened on the play. Rose jumped early, because he bit on Cole's fake. That's getting shook. Period.

It's not a coincidence that he gets shook just far enough to block out the screener from picking him. You could say he overplayed the situation and tripped but he was going to make that motion towards the screener regardless. Even if Cole went the other way, Rose would have still tried to seal off the screener first and then try to trap him in the corner.

Post #1123 » by **mopper8** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 3:04 am

MikeM wrote:
mopper8 wrote:
MikeM wrote:
^ doesn't understand defense.

LMAO, seriously? That wasn't even good "ICE"ing, which, yes, I understand just fine. The Bulls don't want Norris Cole attacking their big unimpeded, which is what Miami had before Rose tripped. You want to corral the ball-handler into the baseline, but that's not what happened on the play. Rose jumped early, because he bit on Cole's fake. That's getting shook. Period.

It's not a coincidence that he gets shook just far enough to block out the screener from picking him. You could say he overplayed the situation and tripped but he was going to make that motion towards the screener regardless. Even if Cole went the other way, Rose would have still tried to seal off the screener first and then try to trap him in the corner.

This is just getting into semantics to be honest. I'm saying Rose overplayed the situation--he jumped out harder and earlier than he needed to. And I'm saying he did because he bit on Cole's move. If you disagree, I guess whatever, but I think it's pretty obvious that the Bulls D was in a bad way before Rose tripped, that wasn't going the way it was supposed to if not for the trip.

MikeM · Post #1124 » by **MikeM** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 3:06 am

mopper8 wrote:
MikeM wrote:
mopper8 wrote:
LMAO, seriously? That wasn't even good "ICE"ing, which, yes, I understand just fine. The Bulls don't want Norris Cole attacking their big unimpeded, which is what Miami had before Rose tripped. You want to corral the ball-handler into the baseline, but that's not what happened on the play. Rose jumped early, because he bit on Cole's fake. That's getting shook. Period.

It's not a coincidence that he gets shook just far enough to block out the screener from picking him. You could say he overplayed the situation and tripped but he was going to make that motion towards the screener regardless. Even if Cole went the other way, Rose would have still tried to seal off the screener first and then try to trap him in the corner.

This is just getting into semantics to be honest. I'm saying Rose overplayed the situation--he jumped out harder and earlier than he needed to. And I'm saying he did because he bit on Cole's move. If you disagree, I guess whatever, but I think it's pretty obvious that the Bulls D was in a bad way before Rose tripped, that wasn't going the way it was supposed to if not for the trip.

You can never safely say someone got shook when there's a screener IMO.

N Ireland Nets · Post #1125 » by **N Ireland Nets** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 3:37 am

Brooklyn beat the Heat...come on everyone....LETS DO THE PROKY CONGA!!!

C0bR · Post #1126 » by **C0bR** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 4:52 am

caliban · Post #1127 » by **caliban** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 8:36 am

C0bR wrote:
Spoiler:

What the h is Perkins doing?

Massamba · Post #1128 » by **Massamba** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 1:22 pm

Hamilton wrote:These might be old but still amazing

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFzXxV7LuNE[/youtube]

Dat a**!

Hamilton · Post #1129 » by **Hamilton** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 5:50 pm

Most hops in the NBA.
I know some of you might say lebron can this but most times lebron head at rim dunks are camera angles besides the alleyoop miss he had against Portland

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSWZBI5Yd1A[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sieftZxTOro[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wNj1TsWins[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYsiZUErRyk[/youtube]

MKG35 · Post #1130 » by **MKG35** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 8:50 pm

Hamilton wrote:Most hops in the NBA.
I know some of you might say lebron can this but most times lebron head at rim dunks are camera angles besides the alleyoop miss he had against Portland

No one cares man, you just found out about Green? Looks like it.

SummitAllstar · Post #1131 » by **SummitAllstar** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 10:07 pm

mopper8 wrote:
jc23 wrote:
mopper8 wrote:Rose tripped over Andersen's foot, but he only was in position to trip over Andersen's foot because he got shook bad.

oh my gosh, no he was in position to trip over andersons foot because anderson came up high for a pic and Rose jumped out to keep cole baseline.

Isn't this the definition of getting shook? He misread the play because Cole had a solid hesitation before the cross, and was out of position when Cole rejected the screen, leaving him wide open. That's getting shook.

It's sad how much trouble some fans are having dealing with such a small thing

Yeah, it's silly that people are still defending that. My favorite response was that it was a "defensive scheme" by the Bulls.

Now to break it down, Rose falling down doesn't really matter, it's the fact that Cole made Rose go the wrong direction (in other words shook him). Again, that is all that encompasses a cross over.

The most overrated crossover in NBA history was actually much more mellow than this, and yet people are denying this new one.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3X274lz3wY[/youtube]

edit: ofcourse Bulls fans won't like either of them, for obvious reason.

SonOfMars · Post #1132 » by **SonOfMars** » Sat Nov 2, 2013 11:39 pm

Canada_7 · Post #1133 » by **Canada_7** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 5:45 am

koko88 wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spDdO_ZB-lE&feature=youtu.be[/youtube]

I couldn't figure out it was Nate Robinson until the end...damn I'm an idiot. The only hint I somewhat picked up on was the jumpshot. Recognized his form but wasn't sure.

They're getting a little old but nice touch to get also a pro WNBA player into it.

Post #1134 » by **DayofMourning** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 12:09 pm

^^

I caught that it was Nate, but guessed that the female was Skylar Diggins....

Maroko · Post #1135 » by **Maroko** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 3:45 pm

Jellybeans824 · Post #1136 » by **Jellybeans824** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 4:26 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTNykAMkl4o[/youtube]

Jellybeans824 · Post #1137 » by **Jellybeans824** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 4:29 pm

What was this all about?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tddc_m7bFA[/youtube]

Zarko · Post #1138 » by **Zarko** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 4:38 pm

Jellybeans824 wrote:What was this all about?

Basically Blake Griffin went to the spot to inbound the ball (which happened to be around 2 feet away from Jackson) and he basically nudged him out of the way. Jackson felt disrepected and talked to him a few times during the game about it until it escalated to this.

boomann21 · Post #1139 » by **boomann21** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 9:23 pm

Jellybeans824 wrote:What was this all about?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tddc_m7bFA[/youtube]

LOlL..at the seven second mark that dude in the background got his finger planted firmly up his nose.

rizkid92 · Post #1140 » by **rizkid92** » Sun Nov 3, 2013 9:31 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoIOqyPzut0[/youtube]