GB Won't Win a Game Until Rodgers Plays Again

MrPerfect1 · Post #1 » by **MrPerfect1** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:11 pm

-The Defense almost Never Forces Turnovers and is giving up 24+

-The Offense is Averaging 15 PPG without Rodgers, with the 2 Games against Below Average at Best Defenses

-The 2 Straight Losses were at Home, yet to even try a Road Game Without Rodgers

TroyD92 · Post #2 » by **TroyD92** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:12 pm

You're saying the Packers suck without the best QB in the NFL and a 3rd string QB who was just activated at the beginning of the week? Wow can't believe that one.

Turk Nowitzki · Post #3 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:14 pm

Threadworthy topic imo.

Ayt · Post #4 » by **Ayt** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:14 pm

Quite the limb.

GB_Packers · Post #5 » by **GB_Packers** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:15 pm

TroyD92 wrote:Your saying the Packers suck without the best QB in the NFL and a 3rd string QB who was just activated at the beginning of the week? Wow can't believe that one.

And they should have put at least 30 on the board today, if Crosby doesn't go into last year mode and that INT in the end zone ends in six instead. Offense was honestly as fine today as it could be without the best QB in the league. Just didn't finish drives they should have with any points.

MrPerfect1 · Post #6 » by **MrPerfect1** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:15 pm

TroyD92 wrote:You're saying the Packers suck without the best QB in the NFL and a 3rd string QB who was just activated at the beginning of the week? Wow can't believe that one.

I see you did not read what I typed. Sucky teams still win games occasionally in the NFL. Heck OAK sucks and they are 3-6

TroyD92 · Post #7 » by **TroyD92** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:18 pm

MrPerfect1 wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:You're saying the Packers suck without the best QB in the NFL and a 3rd string QB who was just activated at the beginning of the week? Wow can't believe that one.

I see you did not read what I typed. Sucky teams still win games occasionally in the NFL. Heck OAK sucks and they are 3-6

I see what you said, and it sounds as intelligent as everything else you've said in this thread.

emunney · Post #8 » by **emunney** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:19 pm

I bet they win one.

MrPerfect1 · Post #9 » by **MrPerfect1** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:19 pm

TroyD92 wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:You're saying the Packers suck without the best QB in the NFL and a 3rd string QB who was just activated at the beginning of the week? Wow can't believe that one.

I see you did not read what I typed. Sucky teams still win games occasionally in the NFL. Heck OAK sucks and they are 3-6

I see what you said, and it sounds as intelligent as everything else you've said in this thread.

Thanks for your concession about being wrong

Mags FTW · Post #10 » by **Mags FTW** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:21 pm

Gave up 200 yards rushing. Can't do that.

WiscoKing13 · Post #11 » by **WiscoKing13** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:21 pm

The last two games were winnable if we had a solid defense. I know injuries have hurt this team on both sides, but the D has looked awful the last 2 weeks.

xTitan · Post #12 » by **xTitan** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:22 pm

I am a Ted guy, but he chose to resign both Brad jones, who is a nice back up and Morgan Burnett who is so damn over rated, terrible tackler and not a playmaker at all. Spending a lot of money on a safety who can't cover or get interceptions is just a mistake.

Post #13 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:17 am

Post-game thread