ImageImageImage

What if we lose to the kings tomorrow

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: What if we lose to the kings tomorrow 

Post#41 » by sc8581 » Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:20 am

Clarity wrote:
Sheeeeed wrote:
Oh you certainly brings to the table, certainly with a mocking matter sometimes. It funny you don't consider your self a homer, or perhaps any bias. Though when it came to Shabazz(who you cleary had a chubby for) dropping down the draft boards you brush it off ****. When It came Paul George saying it would be hard to turn down the Lakers, you said the Pacers didn't have a bright future because George would be leaving in 2014, and that quickly turned to 2015 because you cleary brought all facts to that discussion. :roll:


"who would clearly had a chubby for" Who in the... uses "chubby" what are you 12?

Not sure what the Shabazz thing is?, Many players have dropped foolishly that turn out to be steals. The kid can play.

I (& many many other writers & analysts.. oh & Paul George himself too) brought up Paul George leaving Indy as an option because it was LA. Not hard to fathom.

On the Mod discussion, again there were PM's etc that you have no clue about so ill let you run your pie hole about something you know nothing about, Im not gonna comment on that anymore but I appreciate you taking the time to search & find 10% of the discussion, on a Friday night let alone lol.


Most people would disagree with you on your definition of troll, but youre CERTAINLY entitled to your own opinion. I get it, like I said even Skip Bayless really deep down thinks that Lebron isnt a good bball player, of course like our friend here, its backed up by absolutely no facts to support that opinion but I believe they believe their opinion is right.


Theres no facts for your side of the argument either. Its all subjective.


Actually most people would consider Skip a troll.


Who uses the term "pie hole" anymore? What are you 12?
Sheeeeed
Starter
Posts: 2,259
And1: 326
Joined: May 30, 2011
       

Re: What if we lose to the kings tomorrow 

Post#42 » by Sheeeeed » Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:37 am

Clarity wrote:[

I (& many many other writers & analysts.. oh & Paul George himself too) brought up Paul George leaving Indy as an option because it was LA. Not hard to fathom.


Not hard to fathom 5-6 years from now. You took a comment and twisted as George was in fact leaving for LA next year. You clearly didn't read the whole story. Though what is funny when I bring up the analysts like Aldridge, and Zach Lowe saying trading Monroe is a possibility its all bull to you. You only believe what you want to believe.

On the Mod discussion, again there were PM's etc that you have no clue about so ill let you run your pie hole about something you know nothing about, Im not gonna comment on that anymore but I appreciate you taking the time to search & find 10% of the discussion, on a Friday night let alone lol.


So you think my issue is that I think that the issue didn't get resolved? I don't give a **** about PMs you may have had. The whole point of those quotes to show how you act with your "how dare a moderator edit my posts, and I may just take my ball and go home attitude" if it happens again.



Actually most people would consider Skip a troll.


No ****, but Skip Bayless has nothing to do with what I just said.
Clarity
Banned User
Posts: 5,610
And1: 843
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
   

Re: What if we lose to the kings tomorrow 

Post#43 » by Clarity » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:06 am

Sheeeeed wrote:
Not hard to fathom 5-6 years from now. You took a comment and twisted as George was in fact leaving for LA next year. You clearly didn't read the whole story. Though what is funny when I bring up the analysts like Aldridge, and Zach Lowe saying trading Monroe is a possibility its all bull to you. You only believe what you want to believe.


I (& again many others) took what Paul George said from his mouth as real & also used common sense to say that him going to LA made a ton of sense. The counter argument was mostly based on loyalty & money to which I replied the money was the same if not more in LA when you include endorsements, I also commented that loyalty usually means nothing in todays sports world. The entire context of my argument was that it made tons of sense, the money was the same & loyalty is irrelevant with 99% of athletes in the world today. I wasnt guaranteeing his moves, I dont know the man.

He stayed in Indiana though & bucked the trend, why are we talking about this 5 months later?

Additionally you're comparing Paul George able to leave on his own to a place he said himself he would love to play with us trading our best player who is 5 years from his prime for absolutely no reason at all? When I reply to those sources with scoff or a shoo fly tone its because the rumor they are reporting is so absurdly ridiculous that it warrants that type of response.

The Skip Bayless troll comment went right over your head & im not gonna discuss the other topic you know nothing about any further.

Its probably best if you just throw me on ignore because youre clearly upset about this but im done going back & forth with you.
Sheeeeed
Starter
Posts: 2,259
And1: 326
Joined: May 30, 2011
       

Re: What if we lose to the kings tomorrow 

Post#44 » by Sheeeeed » Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:22 am

Clarity wrote:I (& again many others) took what Paul George said from his mouth as real & also used common sense to say that him going to LA made a ton of sense.


Who are these others? Those on the general board who didn't know what they're talking about? Everyone here on the Pistons board explained to you pretty clearly why you were wrong. Maybe you should actually read what he had said instead of just reading the headline.

“Of course it’d be tough. You’re talking about playing home; playing in L.A. That’s what your family grew up on. It’d be big as far as it being the family favorite team. But, again, it’s about me and my career. I think where I’m at will do the job for me.”


He stayed in Indiana though & bucked the trend, why are we talking about this 5 months later?


What is this trend? Stars leaving for big markets? The trend for years has been stars always stay with their team for their 2nd contract unless its an unbearable situation. Lebron, Howard, Bosh, Amare, and Carmelo all stay until their 3rd contracts were due.

Additionally you're comparing Paul George able to leave on his own to a place he said himself he would love to play with us trading our best player who is 5 years from his prime for absolutely no reason at all? When I reply to those sources with scoff or a shoo fly tone its because the rumor they are reporting is so absurdly ridiculous that it warrants that type of response.

The Skip Bayless troll comment went right over your head & im not gonna discuss the other topic you know nothing about any further.


You're kidding me right? Paul George had just as much of chance as leaving on his own as Monroe before he signed that contract with the Pacers. They both would have been RFA in 2014, and no agent would have be stupid enough to let George take the QO. Because George said it would be hard to turn down LA, automatically gives him more of a chance of leaving? Give me a **** break.

Its probably best if you just throw me on ignore because youre clearly upset about this but im done going back & forth with you.


I know I might seem petty myself getting in this argument with you, but I at least have the self aware to know when I'm being petty.

Also I for one don't believe in the ignore button.

Return to Detroit Pistons