Giants Postgame: Still one game out of 1st

whatthe_buck!? · Post #1 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:57 pm

This thread is also is going to double as a longshot reverse jinx against the Giants...

Wooderson · Post #2 » by **Wooderson** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:03 am

Still on track for 11-5, just need Rodgers to sit out the rest of the year.

LUKE23 · Post #3 » by **LUKE23** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:04 am

I think we will need to win out to get in. Really sick of watching our **** tackling and pass rush.

Kerb Hohl · Post #4 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:04 am

Another game that Tolzien played around "NFL backup QB level" and we pooped in every other facet.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app

BUCKnation · Post #5 » by **BUCKnation** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:05 am

This was a very quick game. That's all I got.

rilamann · Post #6 » by **rilamann** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:05 am

When Rodgers is healthy and the Packers are scoring a lot of points and making opposing offensives one dimensional our D still looks pretty bad most of the time.

But I honestly didn't think that our defense would get exposed this badly against teams that aren't very good.

whatthe_buck!? · Post #7 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:07 am

it really sucks that the vikings can end our season next week. luckily we're gonna be at home but I think the vikes are gonna be fired up

whatthe_buck!? · Post #8 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:13 am

Wooderson wrote:

Still on track for 11-5, just need Rodgers to sit out the rest of the year.

honestly if Rodgers comes back on thanksgiving i think we go 9-7. I think that could be enough. Bears suck and the Lions love to choke

MrPerfect1 · Post #9 » by **MrPerfect1** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:15 am

This team without Rodgers won't win a game, which was obvious as soon as he went down

Ayt · Post #10 » by **Ayt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:16 am

MrPerfect1 wrote:This team without Rodgers won't win a game, which was obvious as soon as he went down

I think you should post this more often.

MrPerfect1 · Post #11 » by **MrPerfect1** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:17 am

Ayt wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:This team without Rodgers won't win a game, which was obvious as soon as he went down

I think you should post this more often.

Show me where else you want me to post it. Otherwise, if you do not like reading facts then that is more your issue.

jtf150 · Post #12 » by **jtf150** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:19 am

All I can say today, is that the Lions choked today and the Bears won a game they should have lost.

msiris · Post #13 » by **msiris** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:20 am

This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

Ayt · Post #14 » by **Ayt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:21 am

MrPerfect1 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:This team without Rodgers won't win a game, which was obvious as soon as he went down

I think you should post this more often.

Show me where else you want me to post it. Otherwise, if you do not like reading facts then that is more your issue.

It isn't exactly shocking that we've lost with our 3rd string QB combined with all the injuries that we have.

Cobb, Finley, Bulaga, Harris, Barclay, Hayward, Shields, Perry, Matthews (one handed) are kind of important.

GB_Packers · Post #15 » by **GB_Packers** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:21 am

MrPerfect1 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
MrPerfect1 wrote:This team without Rodgers won't win a game, which was obvious as soon as he went down

I think you should post this more often.

Show me where else you want me to post it. Otherwise, if you do not like reading facts then that is more your issue.

The point is, you started a thread that was locked saying the exact same thing. No need to repeat it.

GB_Packers · Post #16 » by **GB_Packers** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:23 am

msiris wrote:This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

But they were able to overcome injuries on defense and win a Super Bowl. Rodgers was playing great but as we saw the next year, you need a defense no matter how great you are offensively.

Ayt · Post #17 » by **Ayt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:27 am

GB_Packers wrote:
msiris wrote:This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

But they were able to overcome injuries on defense and win a Super Bowl. Rodgers was playing great but as we saw the next year, you need a defense no matter how great you are offensively.

What injuries did we have on D that year?

Newz · Post #18 » by **Newz** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:27 am

msiris wrote:This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

Is this post serious?

Most of our recent draft picks are hurt. Since 2010 we have Jones, Lacy and Neal healthy from our first and second rounders.

We have Perry, Worthy, Hayward, Sherrod, Cobb and Bulaga who have serious injuries. You know... those guys only contain:

* Two guys who would likely be starting at tackle for us.
* One of, if not the best slot receiver in the league.
* A guy who was probably the best slot corner in the NFL last year.

I'd love a list of teams who have piled up more talent from recent drafts than the Packers.

Ayt · Post #19 » by **Ayt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:28 am

Newz wrote:
msiris wrote:This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

Is this post serious?

Most of our recent draft picks are hurt. Since 2010 we have Jones, Lacy and Neal healthy from our first and second rounders.

We have Perry, Worthy, Hayward, Sherrod, Cobb and Bulaga who have serious injuries. You know... those guys only contain:

* Two guys who would likely be starting at tackle for us.
* One of, if not the best slot receiver in the league.
* A guy who was probably the best slot corner in the NFL last year.

I'd love a list of teams who have piled up more talent from recent drafts than the Packers.

I was wondering the same thing. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and assumed he wasn't serious.

giraldo5 · Post #20 » by **giraldo5** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:29 am

msiris wrote:This team is all about ARod. Not about Clay. Not about MM. Not about Teddy boy. Ted has not done a good job overall the last few years. The D is still weak and offensive line is weak. Only ARod makes them look good. Man this team could be really good if Teddy could draft better than he has.

Dumbest post of the day. Congrats