Trade Ideas - Part 2

Post #741 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 2:44 pm

BCfortheWin wrote:What realistic package would you guys offer for Rudy Gay?

None!!!

WigginsNation · Post #742 » by **WigginsNation** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:07 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:
BCfortheWin wrote:What realistic package would you guys offer for Rudy Gay?

None!!!

Why is that? Rudy is a solid two way player that's off to a slow start. Him and demar don't really compliment each other that well so Rudy's game is suffering. He could thrive in Cleveland playing with a pg that knows how to ball.

Post #743 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:26 pm

The Cavs don't have any bad contracts to send for this bad contract.

WigginsNation · Post #744 » by **WigginsNation** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:32 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:The Cavs don't have any bad contracts to send for this bad contract.

Well a third team can be added to the mix to make something happen.
Firstly would the Cavs be interested in Gay?

Post #745 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:51 pm

BCfortheWin wrote:
TheOUTLAW wrote:The Cavs don't have any bad contracts to send for this bad contract.

Well a third team can be added to the mix to make something happen.
Firstly would the Cavs be interested in Gay?

I've been saying all along that they wouldn't

Post #746 » by **B Mac** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:07 pm

0 interest in Rudy Gay.

WigginsNation · Post #747 » by **WigginsNation** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 5:31 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:
BCfortheWin wrote:
TheOUTLAW wrote:The Cavs don't have any bad contracts to send for this bad contract.

Well a third team can be added to the mix to make something happen.
Firstly would the Cavs be interested in Gay?

I've been saying all along that they wouldn't

What about Demar Derozan?? Any interest in him?

Post #748 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:34 pm

BCfortheWin wrote:
TheOUTLAW wrote:The Cavs don't have any bad contracts to send for this bad contract.

Well a third team can be added to the mix to make something happen.
Firstly would the Cavs be interested in Gay?

Tough to say, but I'd imagine not. The Cavs plan to have max cap space for next offseason and adding Rudy to the books ruins that. Add that he wants to take a lot of shots, and there's no fit.

Demar? Tough call. Probably not a fit either unless something happens with Waiters.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Post #749 » by **BrooklynBulls** » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:00 pm

Waiters+Dellavedova for Butler+Snell+Mike James

The friction between Waiters and Kyrie is resolved by bringing in a rising young star in Butler who is a lockdown defender, solid standstill shooter, and developing slasher. Natural position is the 3 but is a capable 2-guard. Would be ideal next to a 2 PG offense like the Cavs often feature in Kyrie/Jack.

The Bulls get a 2nd scorer to put next to Rose. Resolves the conflict in position with Butler/Deng.

Edit: If you prefer Deng to Butler, the Bulls would be even more amenable to that because of tax concerns. We may be able to offer Deng/James for Waiters/Clark/Miles, if that'd interest you.

Daylyt · Post #750 » by **Daylyt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:41 am

youngthegiant wrote:Would you guys do a Varejao, Mcgee swap? Or even a Bynum swap as well?

Without thinking twice.

Niko23 · Post #751 » by **Niko23** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:44 am

LOL at wanting McGee.

Daylyt · Post #752 » by **Daylyt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:03 am

Niko23 wrote:LOL at wanting McGee.

Yes because holding on to a 31 year old Varejao who has lost a step, injury prone and was the worst interior defender in the league last year (proven, google the article) and Bynum who has degenerative knees is much, much better. Why on earth would we want a young, strong 7 footer who protects the rim and rebounds? :roll:

I would say I'm glad you're not running the organization but I fear you would do just as bad a job. . .

Post #753 » by **B Mac** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:16 am

For better or worse the Cavs are not doing anything to mess up their cap space for this offseason. Any deal that does that, unless a completely lopsided blockbuster of a trade, is a non-starter.

Post #754 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:43 am

Who McGee? Javale?

Niko23 · Post #755 » by **Niko23** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:48 am

Daylyt wrote:
Niko23 wrote:LOL at wanting McGee.

Yes because holding on to a 31 year old Varejao who has lost a step, injury prone and was the worst interior defender in the league last year (proven, google the article) and Bynum who has degenerative knees is much, much better. Why on earth would we want a young, strong 7 footer who protects the rim and rebounds?

I would say I'm glad you're not running the organization but I fear you would do just as bad a job. . .

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ialoWXcCCAg[/youtube]

Niko23 · Post #756 » by **Niko23** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:52 am

TheOUTLAW wrote:Who McGee? Javale?

I mean he is averaging 7ppg and 3rpg and making 11 million per year......slam dunk trade right there

Post #757 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:17 am

Javale has all the talent in the world. But he's got more than a decent share of knucklehead in him. Not worth 11 mil at all.

Daylyt · Post #758 » by **Daylyt** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:11 am

I actually forgot about his awful contract.

Niko23 · Post #759 » by **Niko23** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:17 am

Daylyt wrote:
Niko23 wrote:LOL at wanting McGee.

Yes because holding on to a 31 year old Varejao who has lost a step, injury prone and was the worst interior defender in the league last year (proven, google the article) and Bynum who has degenerative knees is much, much better. Why on earth would we want a young, strong 7 footer who protects the rim and rebounds?

I would say I'm glad you're not running the organization but I fear you would do just as bad a job. . .

Daylyt wrote:I actually forgot about his awful contract.

Apology accepted

Dupp · Post #760 » by **Dupp** » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:33 am

BrooklynBulls wrote:Waiters+Dellavedova for Butler+Snell+Mike James

The friction between Waiters and Kyrie is resolved by bringing in a rising young star in Butler who is a lockdown defender, solid standstill shooter, and developing slasher. Natural position is the 3 but is a capable 2-guard. Would be ideal next to a 2 PG offense like the Cavs often feature in Kyrie/Jack.

The Bulls get a 2nd scorer to put next to Rose. Resolves the conflict in position with Butler/Deng.

Edit: If you prefer Deng to Butler, the Bulls would be even more amenable to that because of tax concerns. We may be able to offer Deng/James for Waiters/Clark/Miles, if that'd interest you.

Go away Brooklyn we are keeping waiters :angry: