ImageImageImageImageImage

Knicks targeting Rondo

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 35,151
And1: 36,233
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#421 » by Fat Kat » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:24 pm

GoodAzzGame_NYK wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
How did the rumors start?


A$$HOLA


Well there you go.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#422 » by seren » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:53 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:
Same guy that can't shoot straight torched Heat for plus 40 in key playoff game and has 10 playoff triple doubles - is elite penetrator, with elite vision and makes everyone better - he's a superstar


Well if you go over one game or a series, I guess you are right. Question comes down to whether you can put role players around Rondo and he can carry his team to at least the playoffs and with another great piece whether he can win you a championship. I don't think the answer is positive. I doubt Boston thinks so either. I see no scenario any team is paying Rondo 22+ million a year TBH with the exception of New York Knicks.
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#423 » by seren » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:57 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Well, that depends if Rondo is healthy or not. A healthy Rondo may get the max from a number of teams. John Wall just got the max. Eric Gordon got a huge deal. Teams still hand out plenty of bad contracts.

A not fully healthy Rondo may only get the max from the Knicks and that could spell trouble again.

Either way, the Celtics are the sellers and have awhile until they are forced to make a decision. The Knicks are the desperate broke team. It'll be awhile until the Knicks can make a move and they may end up with damaged goods if they get a deal thats too good to be true.


I think both deals look awful, but those contracts wouldn't touch what I mean max. Rondo's max would resemble more like Chris Paul's.

Don't get me wrong. I want Rondo on this team and once we get him, I don't mind paying him whatever is necessary. I am just saying if I am Rondo and I am after the max (I should be), I would want New York.
User avatar
johnnywishbone
General Manager
Posts: 9,698
And1: 1,361
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: In the land where palm trees sway...

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#424 » by johnnywishbone » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:22 pm

If Houston gets Rondo they are a bonafide contenders.

Lin's connection to Harvard is probably interesting for the celitcs too.

One more reason we should have signed Lin. Like we needed one more reason at this point.
Play time is over.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#425 » by Fury » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:25 pm

Not signing Lin was so so stupid. Don't even get me started, bro
MelosSoreWrist
Analyst
Posts: 3,534
And1: 1,565
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#426 » by MelosSoreWrist » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:45 pm

johnnywishbone wrote:If Houston gets Rondo they are a bonafide contenders.

Lin's connection to Harvard is probably interesting for the celitcs too.

One more reason we should have signed Lin. Like we needed one more reason at this point.

Lin for Rondo might trigger a realgm meltdown here.
NYK 455 wrote:
greenhughes wrote:I hope Melo leaves and wins a championship and rubs it all in our face.

How does that make you better than the Lin, Gallo, and Wil fans who root for them over NY?
User avatar
[GR]
RealGM
Posts: 16,435
And1: 1,947
Joined: Apr 22, 2011
       

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#427 » by [GR] » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:48 pm

Lin for Rondo is idiotic. Houston is one of the worst places for Rondo
Image
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,811
And1: 15,312
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#428 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:50 pm

Fury wrote:Not signing Lin was so so stupid. Don't even get me started, bro


You've been a good sport about it.. much better than I have. If you need to cuss and vent about it you can PM me.
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,336
And1: 55,319
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#429 » by Deeeez Knicks » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:54 pm

seren wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Well, that depends if Rondo is healthy or not. A healthy Rondo may get the max from a number of teams. John Wall just got the max. Eric Gordon got a huge deal. Teams still hand out plenty of bad contracts.

A not fully healthy Rondo may only get the max from the Knicks and that could spell trouble again.

Either way, the Celtics are the sellers and have awhile until they are forced to make a decision. The Knicks are the desperate broke team. It'll be awhile until the Knicks can make a move and they may end up with damaged goods if they get a deal thats too good to be true.


I think both deals look awful, but those contracts wouldn't touch what I mean max. Rondo's max would resemble more like Chris Paul's.

Don't get me wrong. I want Rondo on this team and once we get him, I don't mind paying him whatever is necessary. I am just saying if I am Rondo and I am after the max (I should be), I would want New York.


I think Rondo's max would be in between Chris Paul and John Wall. He will have 9 years in the league so can make 30% of the cap, where as John Wall's max was 25% and CP3 was 35%. It would be like Rudy Gay's max. I think Rondo is way more accomplished then Rudy Gay. If he can get a max, Rondo can get a max so I just don’t see the Knicks being the only team willing to pay.

A team like the Mavs would probably be interested and they have a tax friendly state. Even more money if thats the priority.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,811
And1: 15,312
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#430 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:54 pm

johnnywishbone wrote:If Houston gets Rondo they are a bonafide contenders.

Lin's connection to Harvard is probably interesting for the celitcs too.

One more reason we should have signed Lin. Like we needed one more reason at this point.


Rondo works in Houston only if Harden is willing to actually be a SG most of the time.. which he could do but I don't know if he can push the monster he's let out since he got to Houston back in it's cage. He could however do his fair share of playmaking when Rondo goes to the bench. It's all up to James.. he concedes control of the ball to Rondo which I can somewhat see because Rondo's personality will force him to and Rondo is great at keeping his teammates happy when the game is in play like a good PG should.

Lin is only attractive to Boston if Stevens and Ainge are on the same page about the direction of the team. I can see Stevens being into it because of how coachable Lin is... and you wouldn't build the team centered around Lin.. you'd build it around whomever you drafted this year assuming they get a good pick.
rl2011
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 96
Joined: Jan 02, 2012

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#431 » by rl2011 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:03 pm

This whole thing makes no sense and cannot be true. Why would Boston want any NY package and why would it want any Houston package?

Lin and Asik are not cheap - especially next year with their poison pills kicking in. Lin and Asik are also role players and ur giving up a franchise PG who is in his mid 20's. That trade gets you nowhere closer to being a powerhouse contender and gives you zero assets for the future as Lin and Asik r not cheap or super young. Might as well keep Rondo - hope you bottom out this year and bring in a Wiggins/Randle/Parker and play Rondo with them.

As far as the Knicks - i mean thats just ridiculous as Shump is a role player with some upside, and us taking G wallace from them really doesn't do anythign but fast forward some cap room while giving up their best asset. This will also net them zero picks outside of maybe a 2018 one which i would hope they think they r OK on giving they got like 5 from Brooklyn. Do not see how this makes any sense at all for the team. Even if they brought in Shump - Felton - Hardaway JR. thats all nickels for a blue chip player who is in his 20's.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,811
And1: 15,312
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#432 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:08 pm

rl2011 wrote:This whole thing makes no sense and cannot be true. Why would Boston want any NY package and why would it want any Houston package?

Lin and Asik are not cheap - especially next year with their poison pills kicking in. Lin and Asik are also role players and ur giving up a franchise PG who is in his mid 20's. That trade gets you nowhere closer to being a powerhouse contender and gives you zero assets for the future as Lin and Asik r not cheap or super young. Might as well keep Rondo - hope you bottom out this year and bring in a Wiggins/Randle/Parker and play Rondo with them.

As far as the Knicks - i mean thats just ridiculous as Shump is a role player with some upside, and us taking G wallace from them really doesn't do anythign but fast forward some cap room while giving up their best asset. This will also net them zero picks outside of maybe a 2018 one which i would hope they think they r OK on giving they got like 5 from Brooklyn. Do not see how this makes any sense at all for the team. Even if they brought in Shump - Felton - Hardaway JR. thats all nickels for a blue chip player who is in his 20's.


Whoever trades for Asik and Lin will only be on the books for 8 million per year.
User avatar
[GR]
RealGM
Posts: 16,435
And1: 1,947
Joined: Apr 22, 2011
       

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#433 » by [GR] » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:08 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402463567380615168[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402464256253100032[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402465200248352768[/tweet]
Image
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#434 » by Johnny Hoops » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:16 pm

GONYK wrote:
Johnny Hoops wrote:
seren wrote:
I don't think that is the appropriate question. The more important question for Rondo should be: Who is more likely to give you a five year max at the age of 29 after a major injury when you are a career 62 percent from free throw line, 24 percent from three point guard?

Don't get me wrong. I do want Rondo, but let's not act like he is a proven superstar.


Same guy that can't shoot straight torched Heat for plus 40 in key playoff game and has 10 playoff triple doubles - is elite penetrator, with elite vision and makes everyone better - he's a superstar


There is that word again :lol:


Says the guy that could not understand how we could ever consider trading Shump for Bledsoe.
whysoserious488
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,995
And1: 621
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
     

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#435 » by whysoserious488 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:17 pm

What a joke of an offer we made to the Celtics. Like they are going to trade their best player to a division rival and get only Shump, Felton, and Amare's expiring in return? What fantasy world was this rumor created in, or do we really think we're going to unload Amare on the Celtics and get Rondo in return?

Man, this season has just become a desperate sh*tshow....
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#436 » by Johnny Hoops » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:19 pm

seren wrote:
Johnny Hoops wrote:
Same guy that can't shoot straight torched Heat for plus 40 in key playoff game and has 10 playoff triple doubles - is elite penetrator, with elite vision and makes everyone better - he's a superstar


Well if you go over one game or a series, I guess you are right. Question comes down to whether you can put role players around Rondo and he can carry his team to at least the playoffs and with another great piece whether he can win you a championship. I don't think the answer is positive. I doubt Boston thinks so either. I see no scenario any team is paying Rondo 22+ million a year TBH with the exception of New York Knicks.


Maybe I'm over-rating the guy --- have just always found him to be a great/dangerous player. He has certainly danced around and stepped all-over the Knicks during his career.

To be honest - I'm so desparate for a damn real PG on this team -- we haven't had one since M-Jackson have we???
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,006
And1: 45,776
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#437 » by GONYK » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:19 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Johnny Hoops wrote:
Same guy that can't shoot straight torched Heat for plus 40 in key playoff game and has 10 playoff triple doubles - is elite penetrator, with elite vision and makes everyone better - he's a superstar


There is that word again :lol:


Says the guy that could not understand how we could ever consider trading Shump for Bledsoe.


Eh, made the wrong call and didn't expect Shump to regress. It happens. It's not like it was ever an option anyway.

Still, Superstar is an overused word that gets applied to way too many players in this league. I don't see Rondo as the sort of player you can build an entire team around.
Dr. Detfink
RealGM
Posts: 18,889
And1: 4,552
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#438 » by Dr. Detfink » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:20 pm

Even IF...IF it was even remotely possible to fathom a Houston/Celtic trade, it's not going to involve Lin.

Every one seems to think, McHale/Ainge are going to hook up again. If Ainge made public Rondo on the block, there would be so many offers more intriguing than Houston or New York. Portland, Golden State, Denver, Detroit could all give Ainge pause to consider.

Knicks have ONE shot to get a PG and that's going to be when Stat's ridiculous $20M per constract is up. Problem being, I dunno if the rest of the expiring contracts can possibly fit Kevin Love. One thing's for sure, Knicks are never going to be championship contenders if Melo takes MORE money than he currently makes.

I'm curious when all the cap space is created, what would a real gm like Jerry West do?
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#439 » by Johnny Hoops » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:21 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Johnny Hoops wrote:
Same guy that can't shoot straight torched Heat for plus 40 in key playoff game and has 10 playoff triple doubles - is elite penetrator, with elite vision and makes everyone better - he's a superstar


There is that word again :lol:


Says the guy that could not understand how we could ever consider trading Shump for Bledsoe.


That said -- you may be right. Maybe I'm over-valuing what Rondo brings. Have just always thought he was a STUD in every sense of the word. Maybe he had the benefit of playing with great players.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,295
And1: 68,070
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Knicks targeting Rondo 

Post#440 » by F N 11 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:21 pm

[GR] wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402463567380615168[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402464256253100032[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ZachLowe_NBA/status/402465200248352768[/tweet]

exactly how i feel
CEO of the not trading RJ Club

Return to New York Knicks