Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

Bubstubbler
Starter
Posts: 2,326
And1: 755
Joined: Jun 13, 2009

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#201 » by Bubstubbler » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:57 am

Bubstubbler wrote:A couple of times he put the ball on the floor, and both times finished successfully. On one he did a sort of Euro side-step with a nifty finish, another was a sort of reverse layup.

Gif of the latter:

Image
Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,851
And1: 2,363
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#202 » by Dame Lizard » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:59 am

I've now converted from the Wiggins #1 to the Parker #1 bandwagon. Parker's scoring is a thing of beauty, and he does other things well as well. Assuming he'll get drafted by a bad team, I can seriously see him putting up 20 ppg in his rookie season.

Now only time will tell if this draft class becomes legendary, but one thing is for sure, the 2014 NBA draft night will shape up to potentially be the most exciting ever (modern technology and social media has helped draft nights to become much more epic in my eyes). If things keep up at this pace, there'll be so many potential scenarios. Think of the 2013 draft (no-one really had a clue what was going to happen)....... but with 4 or 5 potential super-star players, instead of 0.

Don't get me wrong, there's the chance this draft class could fizzle out and disappoint, but as it stands, the superstar POTENTIAL cannot be denied.
noobcake
Banned User
Posts: 2,571
And1: 442
Joined: May 18, 2009

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#203 » by noobcake » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:03 am

Bubstubbler wrote:
Bubstubbler wrote:A couple of times he put the ball on the floor, and both times finished successfully. On one he did a sort of Euro side-step with a nifty finish, another was a sort of reverse layup.

Gif of the latter:

Image


Wow! I don't see any big in the NBA doing that.

Embiid, whose father was a professional team handball player, grew up playing volleyball and soccer in his central-western African home country of Cameroon
Hoopstar23
Veteran
Posts: 2,985
And1: 2,178
Joined: Nov 03, 2013
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#204 » by Hoopstar23 » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:04 am

Bubstubbler wrote:
Bubstubbler wrote:A couple of times he put the ball on the floor, and both times finished successfully. On one he did a sort of Euro side-step with a nifty finish, another was a sort of reverse layup.

Gif of the latter:

Image


My same thoughts this guy is untapping his potential and if hes doing that this guy could really be Hakeem
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#205 » by ManualRam » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:13 am

off topic, but god would you look at how the new rule changes are forcing these kids to play post defense?
no arm bar = no resistance. the kids who make it to the next level will have to learn how to play defense all over again. thx ncaa.

anyways, embiid had a great game. he flashes things that kids who've only played a couple of yrs of basketball really shouldn't, like his touch and patience with the ball. he also does show plenty of things that are expected from kids with his level of experience too. he's a mixed bag and a major project. too early for any comparisons imo. the rate at which he has learned the game has been impressive though.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
User avatar
Knighthonor
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,865
And1: 98
Joined: Feb 15, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#206 » by Knighthonor » Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:46 am

ManualRam wrote:off topic, but god would you look at how the new rule changes are forcing these kids to play post defense?
no arm bar = no resistance. the kids who make it to the next level will have to learn how to play defense all over again. thx ncaa.

anyways, embiid had a great game. he flashes things that kids who've only played a couple of yrs of basketball really shouldn't, like his touch and patience with the ball. he also does show plenty of things that are expected from kids with his level of experience too. he's a mixed bag and a major project. too early for any comparisons imo. the rate at which he has learned the game has been impressive though.

are they really getting rid of charge?
LeonJordanJr24
Starter
Posts: 2,291
And1: 771
Joined: Jul 18, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#207 » by LeonJordanJr24 » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:51 pm

Hoopstar23 wrote:
Bubstubbler wrote:
Bubstubbler wrote:A couple of times he put the ball on the floor, and both times finished successfully. On one he did a sort of Euro side-step with a nifty finish, another was a sort of reverse layup.

Gif of the latter:

Image


My same thoughts this guy is untapping his potential and if hes doing that this guy could really be Hakeem


Whoa that play looked just like Hakeem!!!! Sheesh!
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#208 » by ManualRam » Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:19 pm

Knighthonor wrote:
ManualRam wrote:off topic, but god would you look at how the new rule changes are forcing these kids to play post defense?
no arm bar = no resistance. the kids who make it to the next level will have to learn how to play defense all over again. thx ncaa.

anyways, embiid had a great game. he flashes things that kids who've only played a couple of yrs of basketball really shouldn't, like his touch and patience with the ball. he also does show plenty of things that are expected from kids with his level of experience too. he's a mixed bag and a major project. too early for any comparisons imo. the rate at which he has learned the game has been impressive though.

are they really getting rid of charge?


no, but it is much harder to draw a charge in the college game compared to the nba now. the ncaa made the decision to give the big advantage to the offensive player where the situation has to be perfect in order for the defender to get the call.

that wasn't what i was alluding to specifically though. just look at that post defense in the gif. that is how it is being taught now in the ncaa as an adjustment to the new rules. often you'll see that when a player catches the ball in the post, the defender will actually step back and give a cushion with their hands raised. that is because it is ILLEGAL to put a hand on a defender or even use an armbar in the post to provide some sort of resistance...which is stupid. add in ticky tack incidental contact with the hands being called, charges being much more difficult to draw and post defenders are basically neutered. the end result is the defense you see in that gif.
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
sikma42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,937
And1: 6,159
Joined: Nov 23, 2011

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#209 » by sikma42 » Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:26 pm

ManualRam wrote:off topic, but god would you look at how the new rule changes are forcing these kids to play post defense?
no arm bar = no resistance. the kids who make it to the next level will have to learn how to play defense all over again. thx ncaa.

anyways, embiid had a great game. he flashes things that kids who've only played a couple of yrs of basketball really shouldn't, like his touch and patience with the ball. he also does show plenty of things that are expected from kids with his level of experience too. he's a mixed bag and a major project. too early for any comparisons imo. the rate at which he has learned the game has been impressive though.


I can only imagine how hard it is too adjust. I played the post in college and it would be extremely difficult to guard someone this way. It just gives a bigger advantage to better athletes on offense imo. There just isnt as many tools in the defenders bag. Not liking the direction the college game is going.
User avatar
rockmanslim
RealGM
Posts: 12,001
And1: 7,412
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#210 » by rockmanslim » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:33 pm

    Iona senior guard Sean Armand wasn’t exactly impressed with Kansas freshman Andrew Wiggins.

    After Wiggins had 13 points on four-of-nine shooting in Kansas’ 86-66 victory over Iona on Tuesday night, Wiggins’ name showed up on headlines on ESPN’s SportsCenter.

    “Of course this kid is the headline on espn,” Armand tweeted. “Overrated."

http://www.kansascity.com/2013/11/20/46 ... s-fan.html

[tweet]http://twitter.com/SeanArmand_/status/403011100469239808[/tweet]
click

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013


Image
User avatar
Thespianoid
RealGM
Posts: 33,933
And1: 78,794
Joined: May 22, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#211 » by Thespianoid » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:58 pm

rockmanslim wrote:
    Iona senior guard Sean Armand wasn’t exactly impressed with Kansas freshman Andrew Wiggins.

    After Wiggins had 13 points on four-of-nine shooting in Kansas’ 86-66 victory over Iona on Tuesday night, Wiggins’ name showed up on headlines on ESPN’s SportsCenter.

    “Of course this kid is the headline on espn,” Armand tweeted. “Overrated."

http://www.kansascity.com/2013/11/20/46 ... s-fan.html

[tweet]http://twitter.com/SeanArmand_/status/403011100469239808[/tweet]


This is awfully reminiscent of the time Patric Young emphatically stated that Jonas Valanciunas was not a lottery pick after JV dominated the US U19 team. Wonder how that turned out...
Clementine9 wrote:Missed shots are unfortunate, but it's the trends throughout the game that matter.

Choker wrote:The swing in how Raptors fans have supported and turned on Powell is a good case study of human behavior.
User avatar
ManualRam
RealGM
Posts: 23,361
And1: 2,749
Joined: Jun 25, 2004
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#212 » by ManualRam » Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:12 pm

Thespianoid wrote:
rockmanslim wrote:
    Iona senior guard Sean Armand wasn’t exactly impressed with Kansas freshman Andrew Wiggins.

    After Wiggins had 13 points on four-of-nine shooting in Kansas’ 86-66 victory over Iona on Tuesday night, Wiggins’ name showed up on headlines on ESPN’s SportsCenter.

    “Of course this kid is the headline on espn,” Armand tweeted. “Overrated."

http://www.kansascity.com/2013/11/20/46 ... s-fan.html

[tweet]http://twitter.com/SeanArmand_/status/403011100469239808[/tweet]


This is awfully reminiscent of the time Patric Young emphatically stated that Jonas Valanciunas was not a lottery pick after JV dominated the US U19 team. Wonder how that turned out...


didn't valanciunas play well though?
idontgiveashtaboutmelo
Bubstubbler
Starter
Posts: 2,326
And1: 755
Joined: Jun 13, 2009

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#213 » by Bubstubbler » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:01 pm

Bubstubbler wrote:
Bubstubbler wrote:A couple of times he put the ball on the floor, and both times finished successfully. On one he did a sort of Euro side-step with a nifty finish, another was a sort of reverse layup.

Gif of the latter:

Image


Euro-step at the 10 second mark (overhead tv angle was better but can't find it) and reverse view of the Hakeem move at the 20 second mark: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm2kE71eesk[/youtube]
User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,924
And1: 257
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#214 » by boogie-reke » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:06 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1lgI-8np7w[/youtube]

When he adds on muscle and understands that he's bigger and stronger then anyone and has the need to impose it on a nightly basis - watch out.

It's just unbelievable that he picked up basketball such a little while ago.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,164
And1: 33,865
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#215 » by Slava » Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:10 am

I think this might come down between Embiid & Randle by end of the season. It's really hard to pass up on big men like that even in a draft like this. I was also very impressed by Marcus Smart yesterday, seems pretty level headed for his age too.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Bubstubbler
Starter
Posts: 2,326
And1: 755
Joined: Jun 13, 2009

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#216 » by Bubstubbler » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:41 pm

boogie-reke wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1lgI-8np7w[/youtube]


52 sec - LOVE the immediate fast outlet (too bad Selden wasn't thinking fast enough)
1:09 sec - LOVE the controlled block and immediate run out

Not shown, but I also LOVED how he intelligently used his butt to screen a path for Selden on a fast break.

Love the quick thinking, great touch, intelligence with and without the ball, humility, positive attitude, eagerness to learn, everything. Such a great combination of physical and mental traits. Sort of the Anthony Davis of centers.

His Dad looks intelligent and dignified, too. Seems like a strong-minded family.

Barring injury, he'll be the #1 pick. I know it sounds strange to hear that now, but I think it'll be widely accepted by draft time.
User avatar
EddieJonesFan
Starter
Posts: 2,215
And1: 438
Joined: Apr 19, 2009

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#217 » by EddieJonesFan » Sun Dec 8, 2013 10:52 pm

I know it's still early, but I've finally come to the resolution that Wiggins being a no-brain no.1 pick was all hype. He can still very well be worth the no.1 pick, but he's by no means the obvious no.1 in this draft, at least not at this point. He probably has the highest upside in the draft due mostly to his frame and athleticism, but he's resting way too much on his projectibility to be the obvious no.1 pick. Depending on a player developing a great off the dribble game is a gamble, it's entirely possible and has been done before by older players than Wiggins, but it's still a gamble and not worthy of the hype he's gotten. What perimeter SF who doesn't have very good ball handling ability, nor a very pure shooting stroke, nor very good playmaking ability has ever really become a superstar player? Maybe Dominique Wilkins, but I can't think of much outside of him. Not saying he can't develop those abilities, but you have to gamble on him doing that rather than already seeing it ahead of time.

I still think very highly of him as a prospect, he has a workable shot, he's very quick to the basket, has good footwork/spin moves, and he has potential to be a great defender, but is that good enough to be called the definite no.1 in a draft class like this? I don't know, if I had to select the no.1 pick right now, I'd take Embiid, now that's potential I can get behind, that I know is a solid bet.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,935
And1: 20,696
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#218 » by MrBigShot » Mon Dec 9, 2013 1:23 am

Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#219 » by Lindecision » Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:39 pm

MrBigShot wrote:Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.


This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.
sikma42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,937
And1: 6,159
Joined: Nov 23, 2011

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#220 » by sikma42 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:46 pm

Lindecision wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.


This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.


well that is just silly. 5???

Return to NBA Draft