FFL - 2013-14

Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky, sly

writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1221 » by writersblock » Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:49 pm

fraanciiscoo wrote:Wb you would never say that I won a trade before that happens The Us Will have a black President


When you win a trade, I'll say it. There haven't been many though. 8-)

To be honest, this trade could go either way. If McBob continues his insanity, you win. If Blair is the real deal, you lose. If Burks continues getting some fairly ok numbers, you win. If Taj Gibson breaks out in the wake of a Boozer injury, you lose. Frankly, that's a lot of ifs. So, like Jazz said (and I said earlier), I'd call it a draw (though of any of the ifs, I'd go with Gibson).
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1222 » by fraanciiscoo » Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:23 pm

writersblock wrote:When you win a trade, I'll say it. There haven't been many though. 8-)


well I´m still looking down the leaderboard when i want to see where who are
ps: you only have 1 move less than me
talk to me when you know how to trade or draft
Image
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1223 » by fraanciiscoo » Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:55 pm

you are delusional wb and got to stop it

in 1 month

writersblock"

My point was that Summer League isn't an indicator of success, because players who do poorly don't necessarily do poorly in the league. But more importantly, success after the Summer league is mediated by context. Lin bounced around before landing in New York and getting a shot, and Bledsoe played behind better PGs before getting his chance this year (he's still relatively unproven). Fournier's context is much different than others, with really no one but Foye to compete against for SG minutes. Obviously, I don't expect him to blow up, but he could easily be a 12 ppg, 1.5 steals, 2 3s type of guy, whether he starts or not.[/quote]

then you droop him


[quote="writersblock wrote:
I think that trade could go either way, and it really depends on what each team is looking to get out of it. I think by the end of the year, the best player in that deal could be McLemore, but maybe I'm buying the hype too much. For what it's worth (yeah, I just typed that whole statement, in an effort to avoid stupid acronyms), I don't think he'll eclipse JJ by that much, but he will be better in points at the very least. JJ was fairly bad last year, and his situation only got worse. As for Thompson vs. Crawford, they're both playing behind better talent this year, so generally, I think it's a wash. So, in the end, I'd give the nod to JFrost for getting the best guy in the deal.


this way regarding the JJ trade that is ranked 69
with .491 FG% .875%FT 1.5 3pts 13.2pts 2.5r 2.2a 0.8a 0.8to
vs
your best guy in the deal
.435 fg% .500 ft% 1.7 3pts 8,8pts 2.3r 0.7a 0.7s 0.7to

writersblock wrote:Here's my take and rankings on the 20 teams.

15. Portugese Bees: I had no idea where to put Fran, so I’m going to put him in the worst-case scenario: middle of the pack. He’s got a big man team that isn’t dominant in boards or blocks, but pulls in good %s and points. His guards and forwards are fairly good too, but don’t help him dominate in any one category. I’d like to see him either trade for a big time shot blocker or trade for a big time assist man. His 3s and points will be really high, but everything else, who knows.

3. Kawhi Maybe: Really strong guard and wing team (a trend in the league), with a fairly underrated big man mix. The thing is, I don’t think his big men are strong enough to compete against other big men teams, but his guards and wings are actually stronger and more efficient than others’ guards/wings, so I think being tops in those areas, plus having big men that can beat the other guard teams, will keep BWW in the playoffs and competing for the championship.

2. The Man: Great all around team. Not a weak link among his top 12 guys. His assists could be better, but if everything goes right, he could take the whole thing. It all comes down to Noel, I think. If he plays this year (still an if), Noel will give him a boost that will propel him to the finals.

1. JazzFan: I think this is Wes’s year. He’s quietly built a team that is beyond solid from top to bottom. Westbrook’s injury only solidifies that as he’s the lucky owner of Jackson, who’ll likely cement himself as a solid contributor whether or not Westbrook is injured or healthy. To be clear, though, I think his team starts slow, with guys like Gallo, Barnes, MCW, Burks, and Thornton either coming back from injury or working their way into the lineup, or just establishing their game. I think he’ll be top 10 most of the year, and then make a major run for the championship in March. I just have a hard time seeing a weak link on this team.


then you decided that you knew how to rank teams
so your top 3 with almost 3 weeks are
1st jazz 19th 5-13 right now losing 7-2 vs me
2nd bww 14th 8-9-1 right now losing 3-5-1 vs woodie
3rd theman 15th 6-12 right now winning 6-3 vs the wrost team,sorry sod
ofcourse i was last 5 team

writersblock wrote:Well, Fran, you can be grateful for Landry going down for 4 months, because that's the reason I accepted the trade offer. Thompson's value goes above and beyond what I would have been getting with Gibson (who does well in the preseason, but doesn't get enough time in the regular season to make enough of a difference).


regarding the trade i did with you
ofcouse thompson is ranked 226 right now !!! wow !!! getting 19mpg wow imagin when landry comeback

I could go on and on but cmon stop it
Image
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1224 » by writersblock » Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:55 am

As usual Fran, you've completely missed the point. Let's look at that whole trade, shall we? If you want to go by rankings, the difference between Taj and Thompson is 174 to 226. Rumors are that JT will be starting soon, so I'm not too worried about that difference. Even if that difference remains, the real clincher here was the OTHER part of the trade

Jrue: Currently ranked 137
for
Ty Lawson: Currently ranked 20

Game over. You lost…
and it would've been a hard hit to your team had you not ended up trading Jrue in a deal, I might add, that you would've won: RJ and MCW for Jrue and and Bynum was a great deal, only because NOBODY saw MCW blowing up like that. But then you went and ruined the magic by trading MCW back to Jazz for Korver, effectively killing the value of the trade you got for Jrue in the first place.
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1225 » by fraanciiscoo » Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:15 am

writersblock wrote:As usual Fran, you've completely missed the point. Let's look at that whole trade, shall we? If you want to go by rankings, the difference between Taj and Thompson is 174 to 226. Rumors are that JT will be starting soon, so I'm not too worried about that difference. Even if that difference remains, the real clincher here was the OTHER part of the trade

Jrue: Currently ranked 137
for
Ty Lawson: Currently ranked 20

Game over. You lost…
and it would've been a hard hit to your team had you not ended up trading Jrue in a deal, I might add, that you would've won: RJ and MCW for Jrue and and Bynum was a great deal, only because NOBODY saw MCW blowing up like that. But then you went and ruined the magic by trading MCW back to Jazz for Korver, effectively killing the value of the trade you got for Jrue in the first place.


you look like the two guys from dumb and dumber but packed in one

before today´s trade

I traded
lawson ranked 20
mclemore ranked 184
crawford ranked 93
mcrob ranked 97

I got
Korver ranked 11
Joe Johnson ranked 69
rj ranked 145
taj 175

I got 1st 3rd 6th and 7th
vs 2nd 4th 5th 8th
Image
sabonis
Analyst
Posts: 3,559
And1: 340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Turkey
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1226 » by sabonis » Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:59 am

I got many PF/C, if you want one, knock on my door
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,425
And1: 17,554
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1227 » by floppymoose » Thu Nov 14, 2013 9:41 am

writersblock wrote:
floppymoose wrote:Fournier sucks.

Jeremy Lin sucks.

revisiting for the yucks!
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1228 » by writersblock » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:19 pm

Nice, 2 triple doubles and counting this week for my team (and from guys picked up off waivers or at the end of the draft).
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1229 » by writersblock » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:22 pm

fraanciiscoo wrote:
writersblock wrote:As usual Fran, you've completely missed the point. Let's look at that whole trade, shall we? If you want to go by rankings, the difference between Taj and Thompson is 174 to 226. Rumors are that JT will be starting soon, so I'm not too worried about that difference. Even if that difference remains, the real clincher here was the OTHER part of the trade

Jrue: Currently ranked 137
for
Ty Lawson: Currently ranked 20

Game over. You lost…
and it would've been a hard hit to your team had you not ended up trading Jrue in a deal, I might add, that you would've won: RJ and MCW for Jrue and and Bynum was a great deal, only because NOBODY saw MCW blowing up like that. But then you went and ruined the magic by trading MCW back to Jazz for Korver, effectively killing the value of the trade you got for Jrue in the first place.


you look like the two guys from dumb and dumber but packed in one

before today´s trade

I traded
lawson ranked 20
mclemore ranked 184
crawford ranked 93
mcrob ranked 97

I got
Korver ranked 11
Joe Johnson ranked 69
rj ranked 145
taj 175

I got 1st 3rd 6th and 7th
vs 2nd 4th 5th 8th


Nice job on avoiding the issue. I was specifically talking about our trade. You cannot lump multiple trades into one for this debate. In our specific trade: Lawson and JT for Jrue and Gibson, the clear winner (up until this point in the season) is me. And with JT starting, it could get even *clearer.
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1230 » by fraanciiscoo » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:07 am

writersblock wrote:
fraanciiscoo wrote:
writersblock wrote:As usual Fran, you've completely missed the point. Let's look at that whole trade, shall we? If you want to go by rankings, the difference between Taj and Thompson is 174 to 226. Rumors are that JT will be starting soon, so I'm not too worried about that difference. Even if that difference remains, the real clincher here was the OTHER part of the trade

Jrue: Currently ranked 137
for
Ty Lawson: Currently ranked 20

Game over. You lost…
and it would've been a hard hit to your team had you not ended up trading Jrue in a deal, I might add, that you would've won: RJ and MCW for Jrue and and Bynum was a great deal, only because NOBODY saw MCW blowing up like that. But then you went and ruined the magic by trading MCW back to Jazz for Korver, effectively killing the value of the trade you got for Jrue in the first place.


you look like the two guys from dumb and dumber but packed in one

before today´s trade

I traded
lawson ranked 20
mclemore ranked 184
crawford ranked 93
mcrob ranked 97

I got
Korver ranked 11
Joe Johnson ranked 69
rj ranked 145
taj 175

I got 1st 3rd 6th and 7th
vs 2nd 4th 5th 8th


Nice job on avoiding the issue. I was specifically talking about our trade. You cannot lump multiple trades into one for this debate. In our specific trade: Lawson and JT for Jrue and Gibson, the clear winner (up until this point in the season) is me. And with JT starting, it could get even *clearer.[/quote
TRADING CHIP IDIOT
Image
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1231 » by fraanciiscoo » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:16 am

https://twitter.com/YuranPt/status/401201079792050178/photo/1

Jazz you still own me
I dont forget
*MALONE
Image
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1232 » by writersblock » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:08 pm

I think I just set the record for TOs this season. 86 and counting.

And here I thought I traded Jrue Holiday
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
sabonis
Analyst
Posts: 3,559
And1: 340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Turkey
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1233 » by sabonis » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:19 am

I love how fran offers certain players in trades like as if they present some kind of value, then he goes ahead and drops that player the next day. He just offered me Battier 2 days ago, and of course now he's gone :lol:
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1234 » by writersblock » Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:23 pm

sabonis wrote:I love how fran offers certain players in trades like as if they present some kind of value, then he goes ahead and drops that player the next day. He just offered me Battier 2 days ago, and of course now he's gone :lol:


He offered me Battier too.

But this is a little "pot calling the kettle black"--Didn't you say Evan Fournier was worthless, and had no chance of getting minutes? Had a change of heart, have we? 8-)
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
sabonis
Analyst
Posts: 3,559
And1: 340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Turkey
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1235 » by sabonis » Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:10 pm

I didn't say he was worthless, but in trade talks you were offering him as a top 150 man, which at the time I didn't think he was capable of.
I'm still sceptical about it but since Denver sucks, Shaw could look for other solutions, which might be Fournier.
writersblock
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 71
Joined: Jan 20, 2003
Location: Anywhere but here
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1236 » by writersblock » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:10 pm

sabonis wrote:I didn't say he was worthless, but in trade talks you were offering him as a top 150 man, which at the time I didn't think he was capable of.
I'm still sceptical about it but since Denver sucks, Shaw could look for other solutions, which might be Fournier.


I believe what you said was you just couldn't see how he'd get enough minutes, and considering the way the logjam is going to get worse with healthy Gallinari and Chandler, I completely agree with that ( which is why I left him on FA list)
Globe-trotting and shenaniganizing, traveling the world and taking names...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6CtlAxAIaA_NQBQCuz3q1w?sub_confirmation=1
sabonis
Analyst
Posts: 3,559
And1: 340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Turkey
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1237 » by sabonis » Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:56 am

yeah I said that but as I stated in my previous post, Denver sucks right now so Shaw might try new things and the guy I dropped Watson didn't have much potential, so that transaction didn't have much downside for me. As a result I took my chance on Fournier, we'll see how it turns out. Though yesterday was some sort of a good showcasing for him I suppose.
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1238 » by fraanciiscoo » Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:22 pm

just wanted to say ahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhaha
Image
fraanciiscoo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,044
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 24, 2003
Location: Portugal
Contact:
     

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1239 » by fraanciiscoo » Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:45 pm

Hopper15 wrote:I thought there was a four p/u per week max. Mr. Streamer made seven pickups last week.


Cry Baby who is Mr. Streamer now ?
Image
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: FFL - 2013-14 - Rosters Inputted 

Post#1240 » by Hopper15 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:13 pm

Not denying that you cheated. Good on you.

Return to Fantasy Basketball Leagues