Hey everyone,
I am new to the board, but I think an interesting topic right now, particularly in the NFL because the TV product is so good, is fans potentially preferring to watch at home rather than attend. I have seen blog posts dedicated toward this topic before and I thought it would be interesting to get your insights on it. I am a PhD student and currently working on some research dealing with this topic as well. If any of you wouldn't mind taking a few minutes to fill out a brief questionnaire, it would be much appreciated. Please note, it does not ask for any personal information of any kind, just looking for your perspective on an interesting topic Thanks everyone, and enjoy another great Sunday of games!
https://umass.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_6tDr6RlR3CDzRmB
Cheers,
Ben
Watching at home vs. Attending live
Moderator: bwgood77
Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 1
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 23, 2013
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
the nfl's the worst sport to attend live, w/all the stops in the action w/tv timeouts and injury timeouts etc...it can really bog down
perhaps it's the atmosphere but college football is much more fun w/the drinking and tailgating and a little less commercials
though im not a huge hockey fan, it might be the best sport to see live (that or the nba) especially if you can grab great seats
perhaps it's the atmosphere but college football is much more fun w/the drinking and tailgating and a little less commercials
though im not a huge hockey fan, it might be the best sport to see live (that or the nba) especially if you can grab great seats
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,564
- And1: 6,202
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
I've only been to one game live (in the nosebleeds at FedEx), but I definitely prefer the TV experience more.
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
- Higga
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,877
- And1: 831
- Joined: Jan 29, 2007
- Location: Tyson's Corner, VA
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
gswhoops wrote:I've only been to one game live (in the nosebleeds at FedEx), but I definitely prefer the TV experience more.
To be fair, FedEx Field SUCKS compared to just about every other stadium(and I'm a diehard Skins fan). And the nosebleeds at FedEx are probably the worst seats you could get in any live sporting event.
I love watching football live if it's a quality venue. I was at the Ravens game yesterday and M&T Bank is amazing.
Eric Maynor is the worst basketball player I've ever seen.
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
I was at the Pats-Broncos game and trust me, the atmosphere was absolutely electric.
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,040
- And1: 4,468
- Joined: Mar 14, 2002
- Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
When your team is winning. And its a playoff elimination game. Then your team wins. And the crowd erupts. Its a natural high
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
- Higga
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,877
- And1: 831
- Joined: Jan 29, 2007
- Location: Tyson's Corner, VA
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
LAKESHOW wrote:When your team is winning. And its a playoff elimination game. Then your team wins. And the crowd erupts. Its a natural high
For sure. I was at the season finale last year vs. Dallas, the game that decided the NFC East, and it was an incredible atmosphere. I was also at the playoff game, and the atmosphere was great, though it sucked at the end when we lost, but FedEx was rocking.
There are some stadiums though where it's probably a great atmosphere even when the team is bad, like Lambeau or Arrowhead.
Eric Maynor is the worst basketball player I've ever seen.
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
Even though I get the relative comfort of the press box I still like to watch at home. Between parking, traffic, getting searched, crowding with so many people, the noise, the smell, the nonstop profanity, the very public restrooms, I just would rather be at home. Or a bar.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
- ATL Boy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,959
- And1: 4,005
- Joined: May 15, 2011
- Location: Atlanta GA
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
Higga wrote:LAKESHOW wrote:When your team is winning. And its a playoff elimination game. Then your team wins. And the crowd erupts. Its a natural high
For sure. I was at the season finale last year vs. Dallas, the game that decided the NFC East, and it was an incredible atmosphere. I was also at the playoff game, and the atmosphere was great, though it sucked at the end when we lost, but FedEx was rocking.
There are some stadiums though where it's probably a great atmosphere even when the team is bad, like Lambeau or Arrowhead.
Agreed: also don't forget Quest Field, that Seattle 12th man can seriously bring the noise.
SichtingLives wrote:life hack:
When a man heaves a live chainsaw towards you from distance, stand still. No one has good accuracy throwing a chainsaw.
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
- rockmanslim
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,810
- And1: 7,242
- Joined: Jul 15, 2008
-
Re: Watching at home vs. Attending live
Major League Baseball for whatever reason gives me the best live experience, and I don't even like baseball. Something about the openness of the field maybe...
At football games especially, it feels like being in a herd of sheeple, the way everyone mechanically screams, stands up and makes noise when the visiting team has the ball. It almost feels like a job, and all the rabid fans around you are your boss, looking over your shoulder to see if you're doing your part.
Plus they never show replays of the visiting team's big plays. At home you get to see every highlight. Overall, in person, football games feel like a giant partisan, groupthink rally. Makes it harder to enjoy and appreciate the product compared to watching at home.
Also football stadiums look more cavernous on TV than they actually are in person, due to whatever camera trickery, fish eye lenses, or whatever it is they use. On TV the stadium feels like a grand arena, in person not so much. The field and venue look disappointingly small in person compared to on TV.
Watching at home in HD with buddies, convenient snacks, and convenient refreshments ftw.
At football games especially, it feels like being in a herd of sheeple, the way everyone mechanically screams, stands up and makes noise when the visiting team has the ball. It almost feels like a job, and all the rabid fans around you are your boss, looking over your shoulder to see if you're doing your part.
Plus they never show replays of the visiting team's big plays. At home you get to see every highlight. Overall, in person, football games feel like a giant partisan, groupthink rally. Makes it harder to enjoy and appreciate the product compared to watching at home.
Also football stadiums look more cavernous on TV than they actually are in person, due to whatever camera trickery, fish eye lenses, or whatever it is they use. On TV the stadium feels like a grand arena, in person not so much. The field and venue look disappointingly small in person compared to on TV.
Watching at home in HD with buddies, convenient snacks, and convenient refreshments ftw.
click
"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013

Return to The General NFL Board