ImageImageImageImageImage

Should Billy King be fired?

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

DrazenForThree
Banned User
Posts: 1,856
And1: 214
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#141 » by DrazenForThree » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:22 pm

Paradise wrote:

No player looks at a team right now to base their decision off of joining them. You think Dwight wanted to come here because he knew we had picks, cap space and young players? No, he just wanted to play in NY with a star player.

Durant/Love will look at cap space, big market, ownership and branding.


and will want to play where they can win. they are coming from NBA siberia. if they can get cap space/big market/and a good chance to win why wouldnt they take that over pairing with a dwill/lopez duo that has done nothing but underachieve(asuming we go 1 and done again)?

love/durant are going to end up in big markets either way. id think they would prefer playing with someone like Paul/Carmello/Kobe/etc then with dwill and/or lopez if this keeps up
DrazenForThree
Banned User
Posts: 1,856
And1: 214
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#142 » by DrazenForThree » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:27 pm

Paradise wrote:
NyCeEvO wrote:CP3 signed off on the trade to LA because Blake Griffin is a young player with a ton of potential and had 20/10 in his first year in the league.

STAT was the one who first came to NYK and when he first came to NYK, he was playing really well (an MVP candidate in the early part of the season in fact) and Melo thought he and STAT could do well together.

LBJ could've went to NYK, CHI, and LAC who had cap space, have the biggest markets and brands in the US.

Instead, he chose MIA because he saw that as the better opportunity to win not 1, not 2, etc.


The players want superteams these days because they want to win. If you have cap space, great, but suck, you can easily get spurned.

That's all obvious and I get all that but the logic that this team being a contender separates the difference between landing a superstar in 2015/2016 and them deciding against giving this franchise a shot is overacting.


to be honest i think we'd be significantly better off with pure cap space then having dwill and or lopez in pace. pure cap space and Durant can hand pick his running mates. with those 2 his fate would be handcuffed to them for 3+ years.

I mean if you are him, would you want to team up with 2 guys who:

-lost game 7 at home in embarassing fashion to a hobbled bulls team after underachieving all year losing to basically every .500+ team

-had an epic failure of a season, inspite of adding KG/Pierce/Kirilenko having a poor regular season and another first round exit.

-(next season)Losing KG to retirement, pierce to free agency, and now have a 30+ year old deron williams on an awful contract.

i just dont see that as being all that attractive. i mean, i dont see him chosing the bucks over us, but id think if this turns out as a 44 win 1 and done season we'd be towards the bottom of the big market teams on his list
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,022
And1: 11,968
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#143 » by Paradise » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:48 pm

DrazenForThree wrote:
to be honest i think we'd be significantly better off with pure cap space then having dwill and or lopez in pace. pure cap space and Durant can hand pick his running mates. with those 2 his fate would be handcuffed to them for 3+ years.

I agree we would be better off with pure cap space or with either Lopez or Deron on the roster. Not both.

I mean if you are him, would you want to team up with 2 guys who:

-lost game 7 at home in embarassing fashion to a hobbled bulls team after underachieving all year losing to basically every .500+ team

-had an epic failure of a season, inspite of adding KG/Pierce/Kirilenko having a poor regular season and another first round exit.

-(next season)Losing KG to retirement, pierce to free agency, and now have a 30+ year old deron williams on an awful contract.

i just dont see that as being all that attractive. i mean, i dont see him chosing the bucks over us, but id think if this turns out as a 44 win 1 and done season we'd be towards the bottom of the big market teams on his list

Uhh? Nobody ever thinks about free agency that way. Nobody.

Let's be real: Durant and Love will want to play with the best talent that can help elevate them along with the perks of being in a big market or bigger brand.

The fact is, Durant and Love would be playing with the best Center they have ever played with and If Deron can ever play at his talent level, both would be playing with a complete PG that can shoot and pass. That's what they will look at.

IF we have pure cap space or close to it, they would look at the possibility of teaming up with each other. Durant/Love/Lopez. They would look at that, not who lost in the playoffs years before.
DrazenForThree
Banned User
Posts: 1,856
And1: 214
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#144 » by DrazenForThree » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:56 pm

Paradise wrote:
DrazenForThree wrote:
to be honest i think we'd be significantly better off with pure cap space then having dwill and or lopez in pace. pure cap space and Durant can hand pick his running mates. with those 2 his fate would be handcuffed to them for 3+ years.

I agree we would be better off with pure cap space or with either Lopez or Deron on the roster. Not both.

I mean if you are him, would you want to team up with 2 guys who:

-lost game 7 at home in embarassing fashion to a hobbled bulls team after underachieving all year losing to basically every .500+ team

-had an epic failure of a season, inspite of adding KG/Pierce/Kirilenko having a poor regular season and another first round exit.

-(next season)Losing KG to retirement, pierce to free agency, and now have a 30+ year old deron williams on an awful contract.

i just dont see that as being all that attractive. i mean, i dont see him chosing the bucks over us, but id think if this turns out as a 44 win 1 and done season we'd be towards the bottom of the big market teams on his list

Uhh? Nobody ever thinks about free agency that way. Nobody.

Let's be real: Durant and Love will want to play with the best talent that can help elevate them along with the perks of being in a big market or bigger brand.

The fact is, Durant and Love would be playing with the best Center they have ever played with and If Deron can ever play at his talent level, both would be playing with a complete PG that can shoot and pass. That's what they will look at.

IF we have pure cap space or close to it, they would look at the possibility of teaming up with each other. Durant/Love/Lopez. They would look at that, not who lost in the playoffs years before.



i simply dont agree that a player wouldnt look at a potential teammate's struggles and how they underachieve and take that into consideration. who wants to play with guys who dont stay healthy and underachieve every year?

lopez being the best center durant has played with isnt saying anything as durant hasnt played with even an average nba center. perkins? thabeet?

and dwill isnt drawing anyone with his ability to "pass". he certainly doesnt elevate anyones play and has been horrid in all but 2 months for this team he will also be 30+ with big injury risks.

i just dont see durant wanting to play with either of those guys. if we can clear the cap completely, yea i think that could absolutely work.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,022
And1: 11,968
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#145 » by Paradise » Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:09 pm

DrazenForThree wrote:i simply dont agree that a player wouldnt look at a potential teammate's struggles and how they underachieve and take that into consideration. who wants to play with guys who dont stay healthy and underachieve every year?

They don't. If that was the case, Chris Paul would be in Houston right now playing with superior talent and players with a better resume than Griffin and Jordan, two guys who underachieve.

Big Market, Branding, then talent is always going to come last.

lopez being the best center durant has played with isnt saying anything as durant hasnt played with even an average nba center. perkins? thabeet?


So, Durant hasn't played with an average center but wouldn't want to play with Lopez. An all-star Center.
DrazenForThree
Banned User
Posts: 1,856
And1: 214
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#146 » by DrazenForThree » Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:14 pm

Paradise wrote:
DrazenForThree wrote:i simply dont agree that a player wouldnt look at a potential teammate's struggles and how they underachieve and take that into consideration. who wants to play with guys who dont stay healthy and underachieve every year?

They don't and it's a fact. If that was the case, Chris Paul would be in Houston right now playing with superior talent and players with a better resume than Griffin and Jordan, two guys who underachieve.


1) Paul wasnt a free agent.
2) houston isnt a major market like LA is
3) houston didnt have hard or howard at the time paul was traded to the clipper
4) griffin didnt have the track record he has now when paul went there. he was younger and coming off better seasons then post-paul.

So, Durant hasn't played with an average center but wouldn't want to play with Lopez. An all-star Center.


when did i say anything remotely close to that? I was clearly point out how the statement of "lopez is better then any center durant has played with" isnt saying alot since durant hasnt played with good centers. Lopez being an "all-star" isnt really as relevant as him leading underachieving teams.

also, its not like lopez is some 4 or 5 time all-star. he is a 1 time all-star who got in as an injury replacment. this isnt prime shaq we are talking about.

i think "his team gets bounced every year in round 1" trumps "1 time all-star injury replacement"

i dont think players around the league view lopez as some top 15 player they are looking to team up with. i think they view him as a better chris kaman.
CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#147 » by CalamityX12 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:28 am

Not entirely BK, but 2/3 at least...:

We have absolute no luck or good fortunes with losing records and prime drafts....

1. 12-70, we still couldn't land Wall.... f us...
2. Failed to make the playoffs and instead of "tanking" for Eyebrows aka A.Davis or settling for like 4-5 other rookies, we end up with Wallace..... f u BK...
3. We suck now and can't even land within the first 5-7 spots in this soon to be insane draft.... F U Hard BK....

no luck for being a Nets fan...
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#148 » by SF_Warriors » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:55 am

Dwill - King traded favors, then two picks, one of which became the #3 the following year.
Sure, they got Dwill, but he was a pending free agent, meaning he couldv'e left and BKN wouldv'e been left with nothing.
In hindsight good deal. When it happened, I was like WTF he is a free agent lol.
Also, I do not think anyone wouldve given Dwill 20 mill a year, other than maybe the Mavs

Joe Johnson- Gave up two first round picks for a guy ATL probably wouldve been happy to give a pick to send away.
Seriously bad negotiating there. Probably couldve convince ATL to give him a pick. Pure specualation here, however.

Gwall - Gave away ANOTHER lotto pick for ANOTHER pending free agent to be.

KG and PP - This was actually not a bad gamble, but it definitly is not paying off at the moment

Kidd - So let's say you are the GM of a team that has a 1 or 2 year window at the most. How many of you would think, "Gee let's hire a rookie head coach."


I think all these are fireable offenses.
He dodged huge bullets convincing Dwill and Gwall to stay since he gave up such great assets.

He got swindled by ATL


Kidd is a disaster hiring for this team
User avatar
N Ireland Nets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,618
And1: 276
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
         

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#149 » by N Ireland Nets » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:46 am

SF_Warriors wrote:Dwill - King traded favors, then two picks, one of which became the #3 the following year.
Sure, they got Dwill, but he was a pending free agent, meaning he couldv'e left and BKN wouldv'e been left with nothing.
In hindsight good deal. When it happened, I was like WTF he is a free agent lol.
Also, I do not think anyone wouldve given Dwill 20 mill a year, other than maybe the Mavs


It was a huge haul of assets for an impending free agent in just a season and a half. People look back and say we gave up Harris, Favors, Kanter and what ended up being Gorgui Deng at 21st overall in the 2013 draft. But you have to look at the value of those pieces at the time of the trade.

Harris was an All Star PG in 2009 and still had value early in 2011 when the D Will trade was done, granted he was by far the least valuable piece in the deal here.

Favors was seen as the next huge defensive presence who had Howard athletic ability with tremendous upside to grow plus he was the 3rd overall pick made that season.

We sent our own draft pick which was completely unprotected. It ended up being the 3rd overall pick in the 2012 draft, that pick alone has huge value regardless of looking at who the Jazz selected, a 3rd overall pick has tremendous trading value.

Then to cap it off we sent a top 7 protected 2012 1st rounder from GSW, who at the time of the trade were sitting outside the playoff race but they were by no means tanking and a late lotto pick looked certain. GSW went on to commit the most disgusting and obvious tank job I've ever seen and they were lucky enough to sneak into the 7th overall pick allowing them to keep their lotto pick that year which ended up being Harrison Barnes.

That is a crazy valuable amount of assets that we sent to Utah for pretty much an expiring contract. I thought it was an overpay at the time and it cleaned out. We had really good assets with cap space going forward and the moves King made with these just haven't worked out.

SF_Warriors wrote:Joe Johnson- Gave up two first round picks for a guy ATL probably wouldve been happy to give a pick to send away.
Seriously bad negotiating there. Probably couldve convince ATL to give him a pick. Pure specualation here, however.


We gave up 1 first round pick for Johnson but we also included the right to swap picks with up in 2014 and 2015. The laughably thing about this trade is Johnson's deal was seen as one of the two worst contracts in the NBA along with Amare Stoudemire's. Atlanta wanted to DUMP Johnson's deal, they wanted him off the cap badly to give them roll to make moves. A team that wants to dump a deal, ala Gerald Wallace from us to the Celtics, have to give up assets to do so due to the player being a negative asset. Joe Johnson was and is a negative asset due to the huge size of his deal and yet we gave positive assets (expiring contracts, 1st round pick, right to swap picks in 14 & 15) for Johnson, an awful trade.

PS This is nothing against Johnson because I like the guy, one of the few likeable guys on our team who seems to give a toss but we're talking purely on a business level here.

SF_Warriors wrote:Gwall - Gave away ANOTHER lotto pick for ANOTHER pending free agent to be.


Don't need to say anything here than the obvious, it was a panic move.

SF_Warriors wrote:KG and PP - This was actually not a bad gamble, but it definitly is not paying off at the moment


It was a horrible gamble. Outside of winning a championship it was a straight up nuts move. We now don't outright own our own draft choice until 2019 now for what probably will be 1 year of use out of both KG & Pierce.

2014 pick goes to ATL or Celtics, 2015 pick swap with ATL, 2016 unprotected to Celtics, 2017 pick swap with Celtics, 2018 unprotected to Celtics. That's insane. Having those pick swap option also completely ruins the value of trying to use those picks in trades because there is no clue how low in the 1st round they will be, basically they are tainted assets in 2015 and 2017.

SF_Warriors wrote:Kidd - So let's say you are the GM of a team that has a 1 or 2 year window at the most. How many of you would think, "Gee let's hire a rookie head coach."


King's main target was Brian Shaw but ownership were contacted by Kidd's agent about giving him an interview with King to put forward his case. King met with Shaw for 8 hours and liked him, was his preferred choice but he ended up giving Kidd the job. I even remember King waxing lyrical about the interview with Kidd and how he blew him away.


SF_Warriors wrote:I think all these are fireable offenses.
He dodged huge bullets convincing Dwill and Gwall to stay since he gave up such great assets.

He got swindled by ATL


Kidd is a disaster hiring for this team


I'd argue the only trade King came out on top of in the entire time he has been GM was the Terrence Williams deal.
Image
User avatar
N Ireland Nets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,618
And1: 276
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
         

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#150 » by N Ireland Nets » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:11 am

Paradise wrote:
DrazenForThree wrote:i simply dont agree that a player wouldnt look at a potential teammate's struggles and how they underachieve and take that into consideration. who wants to play with guys who dont stay healthy and underachieve every year?

They don't. If that was the case, Chris Paul would be in Houston right now playing with superior talent and players with a better resume than Griffin and Jordan, two guys who underachieve.

Big Market, Branding, then talent is always going to come last.

lopez being the best center durant has played with isnt saying anything as durant hasnt played with even an average nba center. perkins? thabeet?


So, Durant hasn't played with an average center but wouldn't want to play with Lopez. An all-star Center.


Paradise is right here.

The reason KD has let it be known he has interest in Brooklyn is because of the size of the market and the fact we will spend at all costs to make a team that can compete each year.

The whole NBA has changed now and not many people understand that now due to the repeater tax. Teams like OKC cannot and will never be able to maintain a hold of all their stars purely for money reasons. For that exact reason they sent the best SG in the league to Houston, for no reason but money.

Now when you take a step back and look at Brooklyn from a players standpoint, you don't look at the pieces right now and say, "hmmm he flamed out of the playoffs and he was rubbish". You see an empty cap in 2016 and the potential to do a Miami and sign with another star like Love to join forces with a team willing to spend whatever it takes to win and put players around stars to help them win because players vets will always be willing to join big market teams chasing rings on vet deals just like AK47.

Then the players know, once they sign with a big market franchise that the money will be rolling in on top of their max deal because remember you can only earn a certain amount due to the cap therefore endorsements are what sets players apart.

Look what has happened to Pierce and KG since their move, it feels like Pierce is suddenly endorsing everything while KG just got this big Beats thing going on now. There is huge money to be tapped into in NYC that KD could only dream about in OKC.

Love and KD will look at Brooklyn as a huge market, top class arena, have the best practice facilities in the NBA (conveniently due to be built and finished in 2015, which is currently an Industrial Complex in Brooklyn) which will also be in New York so these players don't have to leave the city at all anymore, unlimited spending, no cuts will be made on anything from scouting to catering chartered flights to taking care of friends and family at games. Brooklyn is seen as a place where a free agent can sign and won't have anything to worry about outside his own game because our owner will always spend. The current problem is we don't have an established coach which is why they are trying to long term approach hoping Kidd works out so by the time 2016 comes Kidd would've been in the job long term and established. Problem there is Kidd hasn't a clue so watch this space in that regards.

I don't think people understand just how much players/agents pull strings behind the scenes to make things happen. Feelers have been sent out and views would be exchanged as to goals etc so that players and franchise have an idea of what is going to happen down the road. Even Prokhorov let slip in an interview that a superstar player has informed him about wanting to join in free agency. Just like the big 3 in Miami, they knew where they were going, it was all planned years in advance.

It'll be interesting to see if Love opts out in 2015, which I expect he will or if he stays and rolls over until the summer of 2016 to potentially join up with KD with a new team with the cap space for both.
Image
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,625
And1: 53,304
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#151 » by MrDollarBills » Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:35 am

At this point, pray that Lopez remains healthy and productive, and we can get to 2016 in one piece.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#152 » by SF_Warriors » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:25 pm

N Ireland Nets wrote:
SF_Warriors wrote:Dwill - King traded favors, then two picks, one of which became the #3 the following year.
Sure, they got Dwill, but he was a pending free agent, meaning he couldv'e left and BKN wouldv'e been left with nothing.
In hindsight good deal. When it happened, I was like WTF he is a free agent lol.
Also, I do not think anyone wouldve given Dwill 20 mill a year, other than maybe the Mavs


It was a huge haul of assets for an impending free agent in just a season and a half. People look back and say we gave up Harris, Favors, Kanter and what ended up being Gorgui Deng at 21st overall in the 2013 draft. But you have to look at the value of those pieces at the time of the trade.

Harris was an All Star PG in 2009 and still had value early in 2011 when the D Will trade was done, granted he was by far the least valuable piece in the deal here.

Favors was seen as the next huge defensive presence who had Howard athletic ability with tremendous upside to grow plus he was the 3rd overall pick made that season.

We sent our own draft pick which was completely unprotected. It ended up being the 3rd overall pick in the 2012 draft, that pick alone has huge value regardless of looking at who the Jazz selected, a 3rd overall pick has tremendous trading value.

Then to cap it off we sent a top 7 protected 2012 1st rounder from GSW, who at the time of the trade were sitting outside the playoff race but they were by no means tanking and a late lotto pick looked certain. GSW went on to commit the most disgusting and obvious tank job I've ever seen and they were lucky enough to sneak into the 7th overall pick allowing them to keep their lotto pick that year which ended up being Harrison Barnes.

That is a crazy valuable amount of assets that we sent to Utah for pretty much an expiring contract. I thought it was an overpay at the time and it cleaned out. We had really good assets with cap space going forward and the moves King made with these just haven't worked out.

SF_Warriors wrote:Joe Johnson- Gave up two first round picks for a guy ATL probably wouldve been happy to give a pick to send away.
Seriously bad negotiating there. Probably couldve convince ATL to give him a pick. Pure specualation here, however.


We gave up 1 first round pick for Johnson but we also included the right to swap picks with up in 2014 and 2015. The laughably thing about this trade is Johnson's deal was seen as one of the two worst contracts in the NBA along with Amare Stoudemire's. Atlanta wanted to DUMP Johnson's deal, they wanted him off the cap badly to give them roll to make moves. A team that wants to dump a deal, ala Gerald Wallace from us to the Celtics, have to give up assets to do so due to the player being a negative asset. Joe Johnson was and is a negative asset due to the huge size of his deal and yet we gave positive assets (expiring contracts, 1st round pick, right to swap picks in 14 & 15) for Johnson, an awful trade.

PS This is nothing against Johnson because I like the guy, one of the few likeable guys on our team who seems to give a toss but we're talking purely on a business level here.

SF_Warriors wrote:Gwall - Gave away ANOTHER lotto pick for ANOTHER pending free agent to be.


Don't need to say anything here than the obvious, it was a panic move.

SF_Warriors wrote:KG and PP - This was actually not a bad gamble, but it definitly is not paying off at the moment


It was a horrible gamble. Outside of winning a championship it was a straight up nuts move. We now don't outright own our own draft choice until 2019 now for what probably will be 1 year of use out of both KG & Pierce.

2014 pick goes to ATL or Celtics, 2015 pick swap with ATL, 2016 unprotected to Celtics, 2017 pick swap with Celtics, 2018 unprotected to Celtics. That's insane. Having those pick swap option also completely ruins the value of trying to use those picks in trades because there is no clue how low in the 1st round they will be, basically they are tainted assets in 2015 and 2017.

SF_Warriors wrote:Kidd - So let's say you are the GM of a team that has a 1 or 2 year window at the most. How many of you would think, "Gee let's hire a rookie head coach."


King's main target was Brian Shaw but ownership were contacted by Kidd's agent about giving him an interview with King to put forward his case. King met with Shaw for 8 hours and liked him, was his preferred choice but he ended up giving Kidd the job. I even remember King waxing lyrical about the interview with Kidd and how he blew him away.


SF_Warriors wrote:I think all these are fireable offenses.
He dodged huge bullets convincing Dwill and Gwall to stay since he gave up such great assets.

He got swindled by ATL


Kidd is a disaster hiring for this team


I'd argue the only trade King came out on top of in the entire time he has been GM was the Terrence Williams deal.


I do agre about KG and PP. IMO Ainge got exactly what he wanted for those two. but as a win now move, I did not disagree with it, although king shouldve gave up less assets for two guys BOS needed to dump soon anyways. That is why it is such a huge risk to give up unprotected picks.
Johnson. I do not hate him as a player and believe he is still a solid player, but yea as a business decision his contract is cringe worthy ifi your team owns it. I did not mention harris because now he is not considered to be that great a piece, but yes at the time he was a starting caliber player
And i considered resigning dwill and gwall as "dodged bullets" because in the short term, BKN did not trade away some great assets for nothing. but looks like king dodged a bullet and ended up in the path of a derailing train as gwall is nearly useless, and deron cannot stay healthy.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,625
And1: 53,304
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#153 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:17 pm

This thread needs to be pinned to the top of the forum until this bumbling jackass is unemployed. King's job security at this point should go the way of Brook Lopez's foot and the Nets 2013-14 season: Broken, and in shambles.

The pick swap with Atlanta, and the Wallace trade are more than enough reasons to pull the plug on this ass hole.

I want blood. I demand retribution. I want Billy King's head lopped off, and placed firmly atop a jagged stick for the world to see.

Kidd won't be fired, and the piece of **** players won't be moved because they're all worthless. So someone must fall upon their sword, and I nominate the man who assembled this 9-17 mess.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,022
And1: 11,968
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#154 » by Paradise » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:19 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:At this point, pray that Lopez remains healthy and productive, and we can get to 2016 in one piece.

I think I'm gonna be an athiest now :(

Sent from my LG-MS770 using Tapatalk
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,625
And1: 53,304
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#155 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:20 pm

No one is coming here in 2016. NO one worth a damn!!!

the sky HAS FALLEN.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,022
And1: 11,968
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#156 » by Paradise » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:23 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:No one is coming here in 2016. NO one worth a damn!!!

the sky HAS FALLEN.


Meh. They will. We've seen worse

Besides, we could build a quality roster with the role players avaliable that year. I'm not that worried yet.
Sent from my LG-MS770 using Tapatalk
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,625
And1: 53,304
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#157 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:26 pm

I am. The team has the "LOSER" stink still stuck to them

This season becoming an absolute disaster may steer potential studs away from us. If Lopez goes the way of Yao Ming that's another nail in the coffin
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#158 » by NyCeEvO » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:36 pm

He should be the first one gone.

D-Will - Ankle & wrist problems....max contract
Lopez - Multiple foot fractures & ankle problems...max contract
KG - Retiring very soon
PP - Free agent at the end of the season
AK - Injury-prone in general, career-long back spasm issue
Terry - Offseason knee surgery which is still bothering him

The injury-prone "cornerstones" and the AARP offseason overhaul.

It's sad to say that I'm not surprised at the outcome of the situation.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#159 » by NyCeEvO » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:37 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:If Lopez goes the way of Yao Ming that's another nail in the coffin

Dude...he's already reached that point in my eyes.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,625
And1: 53,304
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Should Billy King be fired? 

Post#160 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:39 pm

He'll never be the same again. Which is scary since outside of his offensive efficiency, he wasn't really good at anything else

we are **** ed
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer

Return to Brooklyn Nets