SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing
He was before he started **** everyone's sisters and mothers, Darko's a bad bad man.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing
sp6r=underrated wrote:Of course they made the wrong decision. They gave up Harden for essentially nothing and instead kept the far inferior Westbrook. The fact that Durant is so good that the team is still elite despite making the worse error since Darko over Wade doesn't change the reality that they blew an opportunity to have a GOAT level team in OKC.
SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing
Shv3d wrote:Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s
The official motto of RealGM.
SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing
MalonesElbows wrote:No team giving Enes Kanter significant minutes will make it out of the second round, can take that to the bank.
Styrian wrote:Obviously not, Thunder would already have 4 championships and would go 82-0 if they kept Harden.

Frank Mulely wrote:SargentBargs101 wrote:Why are people making it seem like Wade was a vastly superior prospect than Darko back in 03? Hindsight is a wonderful thing
Nobody really had seen Darko play in 03 whereas Wade was a blue-chipper to anybody who had watched him work. I remember him being compared to Jordan during the Final Four. The real question is why most GMs are such sheep and always draft the conventional wisdom and let obvious studs like Wade fall in the lottery....which brings us to Presti who is one of the GMs none of us on this board can even pretend we could out-draft. His slick drafting might save the Harden dump from being viewed as an all-time idiotic decision. I think the pieces they have now can win a ring. It's a nice supporting cast around KD and Westbrook.

jym85 wrote:They should have kept him that extra year and made the decision the next summer


Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.
No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.
There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.
BrooklynBulls wrote:Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.
No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.
There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.
Everything you said is correct, which is why they should have kept Harden, amnestied Perkins, and traded Ibaka for a Center.

Chalky White wrote:BrooklynBulls wrote:Choker wrote:I'm so ****ing tired of the same rehashed arguments about this subject. Did the Thunder get fair value for Harden? No. Could they have? No. They tried trading for Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and guess who turned it down? The Wizards, even if they're the ones raping OKC in that transaction. Same with Jonas Valanciunas and the Raptors.
No one ever talks about the money issue when it comes to the teams that OKC was trying to bargain with. Here we had this unproven max player that started exactly 7 times at that point. No team wants to be the one stuck with a fresh new max contract realizing that his play benefitted because of playing in the second unit and because he was playing with two dynamic young scorers. So there's more risk that other teams have to take when negotiating this trade, and that puts OKC at a disadvantage there.
There was little chance that OKC was ever going to get equal value in a trade for Harden.
Everything you said is correct, which is why they should have kept Harden, amnestied Perkins, and traded Ibaka for a Center.
And the Bulls should have selected Russell Westbrook over Derrick Rose. But then, they do say hindsight is 20/20.
