Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread

ca1 · Post #3121 » by **ca1** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:06 pm

What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

mamadontcry · Post #3122 » by **mamadontcry** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:09 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

Only if translate into Rondo using the pick

Rasho Brezec · Post #3123 » by **Rasho Brezec** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:21 pm

That 2nd one is too good to be true.

cammlm · Post #3124 » by **cammlm** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:23 pm

I want Waiters on this team. He can get to the rim and score or get to the foul line. I like Shump alot, but if he can land us Waiters it has to be done. Period. We saw what Evans did just going to the rim last night. Waiters can do the same, but also has a decent jumper.

MaseInYourFace · Post #3125 » by **MaseInYourFace** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:36 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

They love Reggie Jackson so I highly doubt that's accurate.

MaseInYourFace · Post #3126 » by **MaseInYourFace** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:38 pm

cammlm wrote:I want Waiters on this team. He can get to the rim and score or get to the foul line. I like Shump alot, but if he can land us Waiters it has to be done. Period. We saw what Evans did just going to the rim last night. Waiters can do the same, but also has a decent jumper.

It won't mean sh** if we continue to play a system where players are disencouraged from attacking the basket...

J0rdan4life42o · Post #3127 » by **J0rdan4life42o** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 1:48 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

Chandler
Shumpert
Felton

for

Jackson
Perkins
Adams
1st

BleedGreen1989 · Post #3128 » by **BleedGreen1989** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 2:46 pm

J0rdan4life42o wrote:
ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

I highly doubt OKC includes Adams, but Chandler to OKC makes sense.

Chandler
Shumpert
Felton

for

Jackson
Perkins
Adams
1st

Dbloc123 · Post #3129 » by **Dbloc123** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 3:33 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

That would be a big win for the knicks if that goes down.....

Post #3130 » by **GONYK** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 3:42 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

I have a lot of trouble believing either of those are true.

Rasho Brezec · Post #3131 » by **Rasho Brezec** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 3:56 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:I highly doubt OKC includes Adams, but Chandler to OKC makes sense.

Giving out the best C in the deal and not getting a young replacement in return makes sense in your world only.

BleedGreen1989 · Post #3132 » by **BleedGreen1989** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 3:59 pm

Rasho Brezec wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:I highly doubt OKC includes Adams, but Chandler to OKC makes sense.

Giving out the best C in the deal and not getting a young replacement in return makes sense in your world only.

I was simply saying on paper it makes sense from OKC perspective. By me saying they wouldn't include Adams, I was saying I think they'd draw the line there.

If it came down to that, I imagine that OKC would just walk away. Adams really is the only bright spot of the Harden deal.

Rasho Brezec · Post #3133 » by **Rasho Brezec** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 4:05 pm

BleedGreen1989 wrote:
Rasho Brezec wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:I highly doubt OKC includes Adams, but Chandler to OKC makes sense.

Giving out the best C in the deal and not getting a young replacement in return makes sense in your world only.

I was simply saying on paper it makes sense from OKC perspective. By me saying they wouldn't include Adams, I was saying I think they'd draw the line there.

If it came down to that, I imagine that OKC would just walk away. Adams really is the only bright spot of the Harden deal.

They'd walk away from a deal in which they get a player who immediately pushes them into contender status just because of a prospect? You think they are trying to piss off Durant?

riter · Post #3134 » by **riter** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 4:34 pm

Perkins/Collison/Jackson 1st for Tyson/Shump/BenO Dec 15th

Nyk4lyfe · Post #3135 » by **Nyk4lyfe** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 4:36 pm

J0rdan4life42o wrote:
ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

Chandler
Shumpert
Felton

for

Jackson
Perkins
Adams
1st

solid although i have a hard time seeing them including both Jackson and Adams unless we add in like THJ.

Johnny Hoops · Post #3136 » by **Johnny Hoops** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 4:55 pm

ca1 wrote:What do yall think of this rumor floating around ( latino.com or whatever I know I know lol hold back on the source lol) that sends
Shump to thunder for collison and a 1st round pick
or
shump + Felton to thunder for collison reggie jackson and 1st round pick

The 2nd deal would be an absolute steal for us.

Marty McFly · Post #3137 » by **Marty McFly** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 5:01 pm

if the knicks trade chandler or melo without attempting to get our pick back they're even dumber then i thought they were. you might as well keep it as is. you don't make lateral moves. you wait till after chandler gets back, and let that teams drag us from horrible to mediocre. at best we sneak into the playoffs, at worst we don't. if you don't give denver a lottery pick, the season wasn't a total loss.

Post #3138 » by **moocow007** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 5:05 pm

Any trade of Anthony has to bring the Knicks at least 2-3 (real) picks or high upside young players...in some combination...so they can...at least on paper...say they are rebuilding.

Any trade of Chandler has to bring the Knicks a real starting caliber PG that can help them win now.

Buttah304 · Post #3139 » by **Buttah304** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 5:56 pm

Chandler to OKC for Perkins & Reggie Jackson

1.) Why for Knicks: Need a PG of the Future
2.) Why for OKC: Chandler is the cure against Miami (See Dallas Series) - He is what they envisioned Perkins would be

Shumpert & Filler to Houston for Asik

1.) Why for Houston - Throw Shumpert on the likes of Curry, Westbrook, Durant, Ellis, Parker
2.) Why for Knicks - Asik is Center of the future

Moving Forward you have the likes of Jackson, Asik, Hardaway Jr and a 2015 Pick for the Knicks - Dark Place my ASS

Johnny Hoops · Post #3140 » by **Johnny Hoops** » Mon Dec 2, 2013 6:43 pm

Buttah304 wrote:Chandler to OKC for Perkins & Reggie Jackson

1.) Why for Knicks: Need a PG of the Future
2.) Why for OKC: Chandler is the cure against Miami (See Dallas Series) - He is what they envisioned Perkins would be

Shumpert & Filler to Houston for Asik

1.) Why for Houston - Throw Shumpert on the likes of Curry, Westbrook, Durant, Ellis, Parker
2.) Why for Knicks - Asik is Center of the future

Moving Forward you have the likes of Jackson, Asik, Hardaway Jr and a 2015 Pick for the Knicks - Dark Place my ASS

I don't mind the notion of Chandler to OKC but if so I'd want us to expand the deal so that we get at least 2 maybe 3 young pieces back from OKC.

This deal works.....

Chandler/Shumpert for Perkins/Jackson/Lamb/P-Jones III