NyCeEvO wrote:Rudy's been playing "a lot" better than Pierce?
A healthy Rudy has a TS% of .460, an eFG% of .416, ORTG of 92, FTr of .253, and AST% of 12.8%
While Pierce has played bad, we know that he's been hurting with a sore groin, tweaked foot, and now a broken bone in his shooting hand.
Yet, Pierce has the same eFG% as Rudy, a higher TS% (.504), ORTG (95), FTr (.432), and AST% (16.5%).
While Pierce has stunk it up at least he's been attacking the basket, drawing fouls, and actually passing to his teammates.
Rudy should be a more dynamic scorer and yet Pierce even has a higher conversion raate of 2PT FGs (.424 compared to .384).
Gay should be embarrassed that a guy who's almost 10 years older than him and who's been injured is actually playing more efficiently and has been a more willing passer than he has been.
Even if Pierce tanks, he comes off the books at the end of the season. Rudy is definitely going to pick up his player option and struggle for another year with whichever franchise he's on.
I admit that I used to want Rudy Gay because I thought MEM might've caused a lot of his problems. No we're all seeing that the team isn't the problem, Rudy Gay is his own worst problem.
Okay.
1. Toronto's offense has no structure, so it's basically Rudy or Demar going 1 on 1 (or 1 on 3). Put him in a structure with Johnson, Williams, Lopez, and (to a lesser degree) KG and you'll see his efficiency go up.
2. Could be the injuries, but Pierce doesn't look like he can defend ANYONE right now. Rudy is Toronto's best defender.
3. What does the cap hit matter? Brooklyn is in cap hell next year regardless of whether you have Pierce or Rudy. Money doesn't seem like much of an object to your owner, so why not GO FOR IT while your veteran team has a chance.
Anyway, was just an idea. Stay with Pierce, if you think he's what your team needs.