ImageImage

Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders?

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,169
And1: 15,035
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#261 » by Ayt » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:15 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:find a top 15 center who had a preseason and 3 game stretch like sanders gave us this year. find a marginal starting center who sucked that bad. right... there isnt one.

my issue isnt so much his attitude..... my issue is his play. last year he had prime ervin johnson output on both sides of the ball. his attitude just exacerbates the fact that his play is always right on the edge of garbage. now that hes been paid i just cant wait to hear a bunch of excuses instead of seeing more effort. we already saw that b1tching start before he broke his hand throwing bottles at the locals. if sanders isnt playing 100% all out all the time he sucks. the insiders have said all along hes a dick in the lockerroom and you cant tell him anything. yeah lets make this clown the face of the team.

hes an overrated, overpaid center on a team trying to lose. hes in the way of henson. and hes an asshle.

deal him now while we still can. the issue isnt a barfight. its the 50 million thats circling in the toilet and about to disappear. 50 million that we still have a chance to stick on some other desperate teamand spend on something else. after all the mistakes weve made with clowns like this youd think wed learn on the team we have now.


:lol:

Sanders is so much better than Johnson.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,279
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#262 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:17 am

Yeah, if you think his 70ish game sample last season was a flash in the pan that's fine, but there is really no way you can downplay the level of play his defense was at last season.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Wooderson
RealGM
Posts: 13,194
And1: 5,907
Joined: Mar 03, 2008

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#263 » by Wooderson » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:18 am

randy84 wrote:Remember when Michael Redd was untouchable...and Bogut...and Ersan...and Jennings.

Asset management FTW!


Redd was definitely a mistake.
Bogut was a top 15 player for a year and then sustained a fluky career-altering injury.
Ersan's value is probably about as high as it ever has been imo.
Jennings wasn't getting a big haul anytime after his rookie year.

And if Sanders value is as low as being suggested in this thread, then I'd argue it can't drop any further.
User avatar
Wooderson
RealGM
Posts: 13,194
And1: 5,907
Joined: Mar 03, 2008

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#264 » by Wooderson » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:20 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:Yeah, if you think his 70ish game sample last season was a flash in the pan that's fine, but there is really no way you can downplay the level of play his defense was at last season.


I've seen people post that Sanders play last year was a fluke while also hyping Henson as an easy replacement. Sanders has shown waaay more than Henson up to this point.
User avatar
JEIS
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,142
And1: 2,282
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#265 » by JEIS » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:48 am

My goodness. We had and rooted for a rapist on our team and we are trying to trade our best player because of a bar fight and anger issues? Heck, the biggest reason why we can dream of a tank year is because of this fight. He's not Artest crazy. It looks like he doesn't put up with peoples stupid crap.. ie monta...Jennings...Albanians spraying bubbly... And a holes calling him a thug. He was stupid for being in the wrong place and acting stupid and wearing slippery shoes. He should also not take to social media. Just let it be.. It happened
..its over learn from it...Take a long time to heal and be a better person and player .
User avatar
breakchains
General Manager
Posts: 8,722
And1: 2,708
Joined: Jun 23, 2013

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#266 » by breakchains » Sat Dec 7, 2013 12:55 am

Only the weakest of the weak move Sanders at pennies on the dollar right now. Sick and tired of the Bucks being in that group.
User avatar
theFireBlanket
RealGM
Posts: 11,654
And1: 4,616
Joined: Feb 23, 2011

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#267 » by theFireBlanket » Sat Dec 7, 2013 1:04 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
theFireBlanket wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/GeryWoelfel/status/409095554723897344[/tweet]

If that's the league wide perception, you definitely do not make a trade right now.


great. pile of dung value already.

but if a team calls and we can dump him now.... then lets say no because clearing a 50 million dollar turd sandwich isnt maximizing our assets enough :roll:


If there was charging violation button, I would give you of those (form of antithesis to and1). This kind of position and Gery's own disgust me.
DukeH wrote:Plenty, RealGM Bucks Board is the Golden Dawn of forums.


f=21 runs better with Diesel, #FreeChuckDiesel
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,691
And1: 8,896
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#268 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Sat Dec 7, 2013 1:26 am

Ayt wrote:
:lol:

Sanders is so much better than Johnson.


yeah.. not really much better. its a good comparison. heres larry last year vs ej in his first year here.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 02&y2=1998

ej was a far better on ball defender than sanders. his blocks had dropped by this time in his career but when he first came in he matched sanders block for block. i could have compared ej's first year over 20 mpg in year 4... i picked his 5th year because we it was here and they both logged 27 minutes a game for comparison.

very similar impacts. winscores bear that out nicely
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,279
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#269 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Dec 7, 2013 1:33 am

If you won't agree that Sanders' defensive impact was not only better, but worlds better, then Johnson you are absolutely delusional.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
InsideOut
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,757
And1: 535
Joined: Aug 22, 2006

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#270 » by InsideOut » Sat Dec 7, 2013 2:29 am

randy84 wrote:Remember when Michael Redd was untouchable...and Bogut...and Ersan...and Jennings.

Asset management FTW!


Yeah, but this time we really really mean it. :wink:
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,839
And1: 1,947
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#271 » by Treebeard » Sat Dec 7, 2013 2:52 am

FWIW; Sanders was on the bench tonight - in a suit to be sure. I don't think he's going anywhere, and I'm just fine with that. Wait till the off season to decide if he's part of the future.
*******************************************************
User avatar
bigkurty
General Manager
Posts: 8,212
And1: 1,511
Joined: Apr 23, 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
     

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#272 » by bigkurty » Sat Dec 7, 2013 5:36 am

If we could net willie cauley stein and some expiring filler for Sanders, I would consider that. The only way that happens though is if he comes back and dominates probably. We would then need to play Caron, and Neal a ton of minutes to make sure our draft pick stays in the top six. That would be pretty sweet. Exum, Middleton, Giannis, Ersan or Henson, WCS. That sounds like fun.

As a side note that is obviously and totally unrealistic, I wish we could just trade everything including all of Kohls millions in ownership minus Giannis, Middleton, and Henson for the top 5 in the draft plus wcs and fill out the team with cheap guys and call it a day. I may need to buy an nba video game just to see what Exum, Smart, Wiggins, Middleton, Giannis, Parker, Randle, Henson, WCS, and Embiid could do. That team would get full tax payer support for a new arena I am pretty sure.

* time for another drink
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,279
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#273 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Dec 7, 2013 5:39 am

bigkurty wrote:If we could net willie cauley stein and some expiring filler for Sanders, I would consider that. The only way that happens though is if he comes back and dominates probably.

I'd be willing to bet you could get Cauley-Stein any day of the week for any form of Sanders.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Toodles1980
Junior
Posts: 312
And1: 177
Joined: Apr 29, 2010
       

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#274 » by Toodles1980 » Sat Dec 7, 2013 6:51 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:I definitely think you're a contender moving forward rolling with a Parker or Wiggins/Giannis/Henson/Sanders core. That's under the assumption Larry is Larry of last year. That's a damn good core.

Meh, I'm not completely sold on Giannis being your second star and Henson/Sanders being a contending frontcourt. I think you can be a very good team with that core, but I'm far, far from sold on it being a contender.

While I am almost largely sold that you can move forward assuming Giannis will develop into something special, I think if we land a top five pick this year the franchise will need to move forward and try to win next year with a young core, given the attendance issues this year. I don't know that we come out of a second year of tanking with the team in Milwaukee. I have no inside info, but that is a feeling I have. Assuming a top 5 pick, I think the Bucks should treat next year like the Brewers treated second half of 2005 and all 2006, which entails keeping Larry Sanders.

I say build excitement around the youth, show that they want to win now (now being 2014-15), while still building toward the future. The Bucks are poised to do that. Will that team be a contender? Probably not next year, and I don't even know about the future, but it would at least be conceivable (like the '06 Brewers) and if we want the team to stay in Milwaukee the goal needs to be a new arena, and that means building excitement. A starting lineup of Top five pick, Giannis, Sanders, Henson and whatever young piece we can get in trades for Ersan, Wolters or Knight (if top 5 pick is a PG) or our plethora of 2nd rounders would be a fun, young and interesting team to watch.

You promote Top 5 Pick and Giannis similarly to Prince and Weeks in '06 (hoping that it turns out like Prince and Braun, sans PEDs), Sanders is Bill Hall (similarly praying his big year isn't a fluke), and John Henson is Corey Hart (the guy who is really good statistically, but doesn't seem to have the whole package for some reason). You fill in competent vets around these guys (this is where I am somewhat OK with OJ being around, he's Geoff Jenkins, you don't want him carrying a team, but he's nice to have in the right line-up), Middleton is JJ Hardy (always seemingly outside the true core) and that is a team that has a future and is fun to watch. Look at the Brewers attendance to see what happened with young exciting team in this town:
2003 (last full year of Selig): 1,700,354 (Opening Day Lineup Alex Sanchez, Eric Young, Richie Sexson, John Vander Wal, Jeffery Hammonds, Wes Helms, Eddie Perez, Royce Clayton and Ben Sheets, I include that just because it reads like a Herb Kohl style lineup, if he ran the Brewers)
2004: 2,062,382 (boosted by a surprisingly good start, attendance collapsed in the second half)
2005: 2,211,023
2006: 2,335,643
By the end of 05 to the beginning of 06 it became clear the Brewers had, and were executing a plan, and they were rewarded with a 37% increase in attendance from their Miller Park nadir BEFORE they became competitive. That would be the equivalent of 17,000+ in the BC from the current nadir. By 2007 the Brewers drew 2.8 million and were competitive. The Bucks are a top 5 pick and some good luck away from being in that same boat. But I do think we only get one year to create this situation, so Sanders has to be part of a rebuild.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,279
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#275 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Dec 7, 2013 7:08 am

I'm more then fine with playing them and figuring out you have, I just really, really doubt that's a true contending core.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
upnorthfan
Banned User
Posts: 2,042
And1: 16
Joined: Aug 01, 2005

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#276 » by upnorthfan » Sat Dec 7, 2013 2:08 pm

JUMPING IN LATE TO THIS THREAD:

I say yes trade him for a number 1 pick in next year's draft if that is possible. If not, get a USA basketball player in return.

Giannis
Henson
Knight
Mayo
Wolters
Middleton
Bucks 1st rd pick
Sanders replacement or 1st rd pick
2nd rd pick
Ersan (or trade him)

That's soild ten young core players the Bucks have tied up for multiple years after this one.

The biggest reason though for trading Sanders is a sound basketball one. Sanders is basketball dumb! In the mold of Danny G., Tim Thomas, others like them.

He is dumb as a box of rocks basketball wise. Super athletic ability be damned, I cringed when we signed him and touted him as the face of the franchise. Not for his off court idiocy, but because a franchise that has been irrelevant for most of 3 decades can not put a boat load of their chips on a player that has a very low BB IQ and is emotionally unstable, not caring when he gets a technical foul, only that he gets his point across as an example.

However, the Bucks did have to sign though, that I agree. But now we need to get top dollar for him in return and get another piece to go with a nice core that is gathering in Brew Town.

Yes, ship him out when we can get full value for him.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#277 » by Chuck Diesel » Sun Dec 8, 2013 8:12 pm

Would you guys trade Larry Sanders to the Thunder for a package returning Steven Adams and either Jeremy Lamb or Reggie Jackson?
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,596
And1: 11,357
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#278 » by midranger » Sun Dec 8, 2013 8:27 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:Would you guys trade Larry Sanders to the Thunder for a package returning Steven Adams and either Jeremy Lamb or Reggie Jackson?

Yes. I would. I'd want Lamb.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,279
And1: 25,432
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#279 » by Baddy Chuck » Sun Dec 8, 2013 8:40 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:Would you guys trade Larry Sanders to the Thunder for a package returning Steven Adams and either Jeremy Lamb or Reggie Jackson?

Posted that earlier in the thread, yeah I probably would.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
LedZepp007
General Manager
Posts: 8,300
And1: 3,572
Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Location: Boston
     

Re: Discussion: Should the Bucks trade Larry Sanders? 

Post#280 » by LedZepp007 » Mon Dec 9, 2013 1:03 am

And the hard ons for Burks and Lamb continue


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
The Bulls are the absolute worst.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks