Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,880
And1: 16,414
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#221 » by Dr Positivity » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:10 pm

It'll depend on the team but I'd bet on Embiid going 1st right now if I had to choose one.
Liberate The Zoomers
black bart
Rookie
Posts: 1,245
And1: 40
Joined: Mar 08, 2011

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#222 » by black bart » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:20 pm

Lindecision wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.


This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.

Julius Randle , Aaron Gordon, and Marcus Smart will never be picked ahead of wiggins, embiid, or jabari parker. Exum is a prospect that could go #1 due to Michael carter Williams success. Embiid could go #1 due to him being the only big man with size. Jabari Parker could be picked #1 since he is by far and away the most complete and nba ready player. I can't see any other player besides these 4 being #1. If you think wiggins is overrated, you must think Julius randle is overrated as well.
OleSchool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,980
And1: 1,466
Joined: Nov 22, 2013
Location: Behind you, no seriously turn around
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#223 » by OleSchool » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:46 pm

Lindecision wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.


This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.


I'm not seeing the hype on WIggins either, but I think you're going a little overboard here. Who are the5 guys you would take over him?
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward


NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics


NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
Jaylee209
Junior
Posts: 407
And1: 23
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#224 » by Jaylee209 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:39 am

This guy is garbage! He has no skills other than jumping higher than most people. Florida is playing zone and no one can create a shot for themselves!
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,671
And1: 20,263
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#225 » by MrBigShot » Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:50 am

I'd take Exum/Embiid/Parker all over him based on what I've seen so far.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,880
And1: 16,414
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#226 » by Dr Positivity » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:19 am

Kansas playing weak is the most impactful thing. Being tagged with an underperforming team is one of the worst things that happens to a prospective top pick.
Liberate The Zoomers
bigboi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,645
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 05, 2010

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#227 » by bigboi » Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:13 am

Problem with Wiggins is he passes way too much. He's really good when he wants to be
tlee324 wrote:
Lebron made it to the finals with that cleveland team.

Bird would have won 4 rings with that team, in this weak ass era of basketball.
DNice68
Rookie
Posts: 1,143
And1: 388
Joined: Aug 22, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#228 » by DNice68 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:43 am

bigboi wrote:Problem with Wiggins is he passes way too much. He's really good when he wants to be

Totally agree!
PaperLantern
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 04, 2013
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#229 » by PaperLantern » Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:11 am

Jaylee209 wrote:This guy is garbage! He has no skills other than jumping higher than most people. Florida is playing zone and no one can create a shot for themselves!


This guy can take two steps from the three point line and be at the basket for a finish over inferior athletes. I'd still take Wiggins top 3 without hesitation.

Sent from my HTC6500LVW using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#230 » by TheSuzerain » Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:50 am

Wiggins played great tonight.

KU will contend by years end. Just need to bench Naadir Tharpe and never play Tarik Black again.
Lindecision
Banned User
Posts: 1,363
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#231 » by Lindecision » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:37 am

sikma42 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:Wiggins isn't even the best prospect on his team.


This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.


well that is just silly. 5???


I'd take Parker, Randle, Gordon, Smart, Embiid and Exum all ahead of him.

PaperLantern wrote:
Jaylee209 wrote:This guy is garbage! He has no skills other than jumping higher than most people. Florida is playing zone and no one can create a shot for themselves!


This guy can take two steps from the three point line and be at the basket for a finish over inferior athletes. I'd still take Wiggins top 3 without hesitation.

Sent from my HTC6500LVW using RealGM Forums mobile app


So? Being able to use his athleticism against college bums doesn't mean jack. Unlike the 6 prospects listed above, Wiggins hasn't shown any real basketball skills that can translate to the NBA.
Okada
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 687
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#232 » by Okada » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:43 am

Best high school prospect in a decade plays 9 college basketball games (and actually plays pretty well, no less) and suddenly he's not a top 5 pick? Relax.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,671
And1: 20,263
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#233 » by MrBigShot » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:04 am

Lindecision wrote:
sikma42 wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
This.

Come draft night there might be 5 guys I'd take ahead of Wiggins.


well that is just silly. 5???


I'd take Parker, Randle, Gordon, Smart, Embiid and Exum all ahead of him.


Gordon? That's just silly.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Okada
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 687
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#234 » by Okada » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:16 am

Lol @ the "hasn't shown any real basketball skills that can translate to the NBA."

Yes, because being an elite college basketball player from day 1 at 18 years old typically involves a lack of NBA skill.
gcates
Sophomore
Posts: 103
And1: 23
Joined: Nov 19, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#235 » by gcates » Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:24 am

MrBigShot wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
sikma42 wrote:
well that is just silly. 5???


I'd take Parker, Randle, Gordon, Smart, Embiid and Exum all ahead of him.


Gordon? That's just silly.


Don't sleep on Gordon...
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#236 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:48 am

DNice68 wrote:
bigboi wrote:Problem with Wiggins is he passes way too much. He's really good when he wants to be

Totally agree!

Then he must not pass very well, because he has a grand total of 1 assist in the last 4 games?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#237 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:51 am

gcates wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:
Lindecision wrote:
I'd take Parker, Randle, Gordon, Smart, Embiid and Exum all ahead of him.


Gordon? That's just silly.


Don't sleep on Gordon...

Gordon's a smallish PF without great reach who doesn't shoot real well.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
gcates
Sophomore
Posts: 103
And1: 23
Joined: Nov 19, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#238 » by gcates » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:29 pm

Ruzious wrote:
gcates wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:
Gordon? That's just silly.


Don't sleep on Gordon...

Gordon's a smallish PF without great reach who doesn't shoot real well.


Shooting can easily improve, and it's not like he's a perimeter player prospect with a broken jumpshot. His game doesn't rely on his shooting prowess.

Honestly, I agree, he can certainly put on some weight, but his frame will handle it well and he isn't exactly small in the height/length sense. Higher standing reach than Julius Randle and a slightly greater wingspan to boot.

Kid can ball man...I'm just sayin.
CBB_Fan
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 138
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#239 » by CBB_Fan » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:30 pm

Don't know how many saw it, but Wiggins scored 11 points in about 1:30 last night and almost was able to turn a blowout into a win by himself. It may not be that important in terms of wins or losses, but I think it helps show that he does have a little alpha dog personality in him. Stats:

7-15 FG
4-9 3PT
8-8 FT
11 RBDs (4 O - 7 D)
2 BLKs

Overall a very impressive statline. Really like the Paul George comparison for him, though Wiggins will come in a year younger and probably play better than George did his rookie year (thinking more like last year's George). Is that a lock for the #1 pick? I think it is a lock for the top tier, but at that tier I think teams pick on need.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1? 

Post#240 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:26 pm

CBB_Fan wrote:Don't know how many saw it, but Wiggins scored 11 points in about 1:30 last night and almost was able to turn a blowout into a win by himself. It may not be that important in terms of wins or losses, but I think it helps show that he does have a little alpha dog personality in him. Stats:

7-15 FG
4-9 3PT
8-8 FT
11 RBDs (4 O - 7 D)
2 BLKs

Overall a very impressive statline. Really like the Paul George comparison for him, though Wiggins will come in a year younger and probably play better than George did his rookie year (thinking more like last year's George). Is that a lock for the #1 pick? I think it is a lock for the top tier, but at that tier I think teams pick on need.

Agreed. That's the kind of game some of us were waiting for. I think teams wanting a player who they can run their offense through right away will take Parker ahead of Wiggins, and depending on how Embiid looks, a team wanting a center could pick him first. But Wiggins has probably the best chance right now of going 1st.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams

Return to NBA Draft