Jay10 wrote:Tough situation for Knicks: With no first-round pick to add, NYK could be confronted w/unsavory option of putting Tim Hardaway Jr. in deal
- marc stein
Then the Knicks should end the call after saying, "thanks, but no thanks".
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Jay10 wrote:Tough situation for Knicks: With no first-round pick to add, NYK could be confronted w/unsavory option of putting Tim Hardaway Jr. in deal
- marc stein

“There’s always going to be Knicks fans, though,” Williams said. “They’ll sneak in. They’ll find a way.”
Jay10 wrote:Tough situation for Knicks: With no first-round pick to add, NYK could be confronted w/unsavory option of putting Tim Hardaway Jr. in deal
- marc stein

knicks85 wrote:TheBigBoss wrote:KnicksGod wrote:He's a lot better than Felton.
Big idea here -- they probably would love to dump Fields. So just give them cap junk and take back Fields and Lowry.
Doing Shumpert would be stupid.
Nope! Hell no to Fields, but reacquiring Novak is fine.
lol you serious....ill tkae Fields>>>> Novak
Mr_Perfect wrote:KnicksGod wrote:Mr_Perfect wrote:Someone give a good argument about how Lowry is an upgrade over Felton. Or should I say anything more than a marginal upgrade.
They are the same type of player.
Dude is 15 and 7 with 36% from 3 and plays D. Definitely much better than Felton. Just not a great playmaker. Does all else well, including being a jerk.
36% is not very good. It's simply average. It's also his career high as he's never been a good 3 point shooter.
Lowry's FG% is awful and he is a hoot first of like Felton. The only thing he has over Felton is athleticism. But Lowry is not that much better than Felton. Raptors fans will tell you the same thing.


omerome wrote:god shammgod wrote:Frank Isola @FisolaNYDN 1m
Knicks, Nets & Warriors all interested in Toronto point guard Kyle Lowry.
so, not gonna be that easy.
I wonder why the Warriors are that interested. Maybe Klay for Lowry and assets so they can move Curry to the 2?
Even then, I would not even make that trade. Klay and Curry aren't great defensively but the Warriors should aim higher than that imo.

SuperflyKnick wrote:TheBigBoss wrote:KnicksGod wrote:He's a lot better than Felton.
Big idea here -- they probably would love to dump Fields. So just give them cap junk and take back Fields and Lowry.
Doing Shumpert would be stupid.
Nope! Hell no to Fields, but reacquiring Novak is fine.
So u rather take on another yr on novaks contract instead of fields
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
TheBigBoss wrote:knicks85 wrote:TheBigBoss wrote:
Nope! Hell no to Fields, but reacquiring Novak is fine.
lol you serious....ill tkae Fields>>>> Novak
Fields is a scrub, NOVAK can atleast spread the floor.
NYK 455 wrote:Masai will **** us, guaranteed.
shmeakone wrote:Mr_Perfect wrote:Someone give a good argument about how Lowry is an upgrade over Felton. Or should I say anything more than a marginal upgrade.
They are the same type of player.
Lowry's tougher & a better defender. Plus he's better in pretty much everything else.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app
[GR] wrote:omerome wrote:god shammgod wrote:Frank Isola @FisolaNYDN 1m
Knicks, Nets & Warriors all interested in Toronto point guard Kyle Lowry.
so, not gonna be that easy.
I wonder why the Warriors are that interested. Maybe Klay for Lowry and assets so they can move Curry to the 2?
Even then, I would not even make that trade. Klay and Curry aren't great defensively but the Warriors should aim higher than that imo.
lmao. You cant be serious
TheBigBoss wrote:knicks85 wrote:TheBigBoss wrote:
Nope! Hell no to Fields, but reacquiring Novak is fine.
lol you serious....ill tkae Fields>>>> Novak
Fields is a scrub, NOVAK can atleast spread the floor.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
ORANGEandBLUE wrote:Another key difference between Felton and Lowry is that Lowry expires in 2015 whereas Felton only expires then if he exercises his player option, which he won't because at the rate he's going out he won't get a single offer.
omerome wrote:[GR] wrote:omerome wrote:I wonder why the Warriors are that interested. Maybe Klay for Lowry and assets so they can move Curry to the 2?
Even then, I would not even make that trade. Klay and Curry aren't great defensively but the Warriors should aim higher than that imo.
lmao. You cant be serious
?
ezmoney707 wrote:We gonna get raped
Bulls69 wrote:The think about the Bulls we realizes we sucks but the Knicks on the other hand think everyone wants to play a garbage a** team. get real a team who has not won a win in over thirty -five years