ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
jeffya2
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 2,983
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
     

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1381 » by jeffya2 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:50 am

dballislife wrote:wiggins can be a great nba player, but no way is he looking like a for sure star, let alone for sure franchise changing superstar


Wiggins has great potential but lacks the drive,heart & ALPHA mentality needed to be an allstar
He floats & disappears for large parts of the game, & only plays hard in spurts

I think we will have a shot @ him with our 8 -10th pick
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,549
And1: 22,604
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1382 » by Randle McMurphy » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:19 am

jeffya2 wrote:
dballislife wrote:wiggins can be a great nba player, but no way is he looking like a for sure star, let alone for sure franchise changing superstar


Wiggins has great potential but lacks the drive,heart & ALPHA mentality needed to be an allstar
He floats & disappears for large parts of the game, & only plays hard in spurts

I think we will have a shot @ him with our 8 -10th pick

Image
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
mtcan
RealGM
Posts: 27,889
And1: 24,317
Joined: May 19, 2001

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1383 » by mtcan » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:00 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
jeffya2 wrote:
dballislife wrote:wiggins can be a great nba player, but no way is he looking like a for sure star, let alone for sure franchise changing superstar


Wiggins has great potential but lacks the drive,heart & ALPHA mentality needed to be an allstar
He floats & disappears for large parts of the game, & only plays hard in spurts

I think we will have a shot @ him with our 8 -10th pick

Image


So that's the plan...don't tank...then start a smear campaign to drive down Wiggins' draft stock so that we can take him with the 16th overall pick. Brilliant.

Who wants to plant the evidence that will get Andrew arrested for stealing laptops? Maybe someone can photoshop Andrew hanging out with Rob Ford?
Ragnar0k
Banned User
Posts: 402
And1: 90
Joined: Nov 20, 2013

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1384 » by Ragnar0k » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:39 pm

Boogie! wrote:
Scarface844 wrote:I apologize if what im about to say has already been said. The Wiggins and Jabari scenario reminds me of Lebron and Melo in the 03 draft. There was a lot of hype behind Lebrons athleticism while being considered a weak jump shooter.

He was also considered very raw and had a long way to go in developing his skills. He was also coming to the NBA straight out of high school.

Melo on the other hand played in college, and while their was a lot of hype behind Lebron and his athleticism (Wiggins) Melo was considered more developed, less raw and was considered the safer option (Jabari).

Lebrons potential defensively and all around was crazy (Wiggins). He was also the hometown hero much like Wiggins would be for Toronto.

Melo was considered a natural scorer who could play both the SF or PF (Jabari) and while his scoring was there and would continue to improve, defensively he wouldnt improve by much.

My point with all this is for those saying go with Jabari or go with someone whos safer needs to understand its not just Wiggins being from Toronto that he needs to come here.

His athleticism is the once every generation type much like Lebron. Wiggins has more risk but the reward is even greater if he develops properly. With Masai, a new FO, and soon to be new coaches and players I have no doubt that, that's what will happen, so im willing to risk it all on Wiggins potential.


that's kind of bs. lebron had pg skills with forward size and elite athleticism from the get go. his jumpshot was a weakness yes. but he was a more refined player than wiggins. so far, wiggins main strength is his athleticism only... he seems to be a capable defender, but he doesn't have the ball skills and vision that lebron had. that being said the kansas system doesn't favour him offensively and i think his skillset would translate better to the nba.

and lebron is literally a freak of nature with his width, his length, his strength, his athleticism, his speed. he's just a beast and not many people are built like he is which is one of the main reasons he's so good. combine that with his amazing basketball iq and you have possibly the G.O.A.T. wiggins on the other hand, is pretty damn skinny and doesn't look very strong physically. and he doesn't really have wide shoulders either, so it's not like he's gonna fill out and get jacked.


Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Wiggins has the frame to put on another 30-40lbs. We gotta keep in mind he's only 18 and potentially still going to grow another inch or two, and people tend to be lanky while they're still growing. Not everyone is 6'8 and 240 coming out of high school. Wiggins I think is listed at 200.

Jordan at UNC in his freshman season was listed at 185-190, and later ended up being about 230-235.

TMac is another good example. You can just tell they're going to fill out as long as they put in the work over the years.
fredericklove
Banned User
Posts: 24,571
And1: 6,398
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
Location: Toronto Raptors Playoffs Trauma Treatment Center
     

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1385 » by fredericklove » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:54 pm

Doesn't Jabari play more Lebron style for those that compare Wiggins to Lebron and Jabari to Melo? Especially when Jabari possesses more point forward skills than Wiggin does, so idk how one can literally use Lebron vs. Melo case to remind of this year's two, the elite athleticism okay, that's where it ends, and really nothing suggests the same style of play between Wiggins and Lebron.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,549
And1: 22,604
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1386 » by Randle McMurphy » Sun Dec 15, 2013 3:14 pm

I wouldn't say either of them play anywhere close to LeBron's style.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
rapsfan31
Rookie
Posts: 1,175
And1: 29
Joined: Oct 15, 2005

Giannis Vs Wiggins 

Post#1387 » by rapsfan31 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 4:05 pm

Does anyone have a comparison of Wiggins with Giannis?
Based on what I have seen I seem to like Giannis more than Wiggins!
I think that Giannis has a higher ceiling than Wiggins!
umirin
Sophomore
Posts: 223
And1: 627
Joined: Oct 30, 2013

If Wiggins likes Toronto so much... 

Post#1388 » by umirin » Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:04 pm

He should not declare for the draft, and then just straight up sign with Toronto
:D :D
User avatar
Yosemite Dan
RealGM
Posts: 11,431
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 16, 2006

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1389 » by Yosemite Dan » Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:36 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Yosemite Dan wrote:You can't see the forest from the trees but then I'm not suprised. If the Raps drafted Wiggins at #1, you know what kind of marketing drive that would result? MLSE would make him out to be the next Jordan and if he faltered as in a Bargs (I consider Bargs to be a partial bust) type of career where he shows occasional flashes but can never bring it together for a sustained period and the team continues to wallow in mediocrity for several years as they try to build a team to best suit him then yeah it would kill interest in the fanbase. The average fan would think if we screwed it up with Wiggins then what's the point.

Yet again, you've missed the point. The Raptors are one of the worst organizations in major professional sports as it is. Since Vince Carter was dealt, basketball has become just another niche sport in the city/country. Nobody watches them on television (they get a fraction of the ratings of teams like the Leafs, the Jays and even curling). The serious fans believe the organization is a joke and the casuals (when actually devote any attention at all to them) have come to the same conclusion. They're fortunate to get decent attendance they do, but that isn't going to last either once Masai blows up the team and destroys all of Colangelo's false hope for good. You talk about a possible Wiggins bust killing fan interest, but what kind of situation do you think we're dealing with right now? A positive one?

It can't get much worse than a situation where nobody cares. And that's exactly what faces the Toronto Raptors right now.

Look at what kind of mess this team is in now because of the Bargs experiment. You don't think almost every move the team made after drafting Wiggins would be to try and get the team to gel around him and if he failed to live up to expecatations then we would be spinning our wheels yet again.

We're already spinning our wheels. All that drafting Wiggins (or any of these other potential stars in either this draft or future ones) will do is give the franchise a chance to give out of that pattern. That's the point of doing it. That's the point of getting high-ceiling prospects even if they bust. That's the point of accumulating future assets in the greater scheme of things. If it all doesn't work, you're just back in the same depressing mess that you're in right now. There's no reason not to give it a shot and look for that next Vince Carter.

I thought you were only annoying on the baseball board but your special talent spreads across 2 sports.

Of course, you're every bit as much of a troll everywhere. Talking about Wiggins like he's a bust because he had a bad December game (I should note that you rather noticeably didn't post after either of Wiggins' two previous games where he completely went off on his opponents in hostile road environments) and suggesting ridiculously that the franchise would never recover if they drafted him. Yeah, I'd say you came in here specifically for that purpose.


Blah, blah, blah. Congrats, your posts have bored the hell out of me. I even read it in monotone.
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Giannis Vs Wiggins 

Post#1390 » by Kabookalu » Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:01 pm

rapsfan31 wrote:Does anyone have a comparison of Wiggins with Giannis?
Based on what I have seen I seem to like Giannis more than Wiggins!
I think that Giannis has a higher ceiling than Wiggins!


Giannis is even more raw than Wiggins and not nearly as smooth of an athlete.
Read on Twitter
rapsfan31
Rookie
Posts: 1,175
And1: 29
Joined: Oct 15, 2005

Re: Giannis Vs Wiggins 

Post#1391 » by rapsfan31 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:12 pm

Choker wrote:
rapsfan31 wrote:Does anyone have a comparison of Wiggins with Giannis?
Based on what I have seen I seem to like Giannis more than Wiggins!
I think that Giannis has a higher ceiling than Wiggins!


Giannis is even more raw than Wiggins and not nearly as smooth of an athlete.



I think that Giannis is a hybrid of Kevin Durant and Toni Kukoc!
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,549
And1: 22,604
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1392 » by Randle McMurphy » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:45 pm

Yosemite Dan wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Yosemite Dan wrote:You can't see the forest from the trees but then I'm not suprised. If the Raps drafted Wiggins at #1, you know what kind of marketing drive that would result? MLSE would make him out to be the next Jordan and if he faltered as in a Bargs (I consider Bargs to be a partial bust) type of career where he shows occasional flashes but can never bring it together for a sustained period and the team continues to wallow in mediocrity for several years as they try to build a team to best suit him then yeah it would kill interest in the fanbase. The average fan would think if we screwed it up with Wiggins then what's the point.

Yet again, you've missed the point. The Raptors are one of the worst organizations in major professional sports as it is. Since Vince Carter was dealt, basketball has become just another niche sport in the city/country. Nobody watches them on television (they get a fraction of the ratings of teams like the Leafs, the Jays and even curling). The serious fans believe the organization is a joke and the casuals (when actually devote any attention at all to them) have come to the same conclusion. They're fortunate to get decent attendance they do, but that isn't going to last either once Masai blows up the team and destroys all of Colangelo's false hope for good. You talk about a possible Wiggins bust killing fan interest, but what kind of situation do you think we're dealing with right now? A positive one?

It can't get much worse than a situation where nobody cares. And that's exactly what faces the Toronto Raptors right now.

Look at what kind of mess this team is in now because of the Bargs experiment. You don't think almost every move the team made after drafting Wiggins would be to try and get the team to gel around him and if he failed to live up to expecatations then we would be spinning our wheels yet again.

We're already spinning our wheels. All that drafting Wiggins (or any of these other potential stars in either this draft or future ones) will do is give the franchise a chance to give out of that pattern. That's the point of doing it. That's the point of getting high-ceiling prospects even if they bust. That's the point of accumulating future assets in the greater scheme of things. If it all doesn't work, you're just back in the same depressing mess that you're in right now. There's no reason not to give it a shot and look for that next Vince Carter.

I thought you were only annoying on the baseball board but your special talent spreads across 2 sports.

Of course, you're every bit as much of a troll everywhere. Talking about Wiggins like he's a bust because he had a bad December game (I should note that you rather noticeably didn't post after either of Wiggins' two previous games where he completely went off on his opponents in hostile road environments) and suggesting ridiculously that the franchise would never recover if they drafted him. Yeah, I'd say you came in here specifically for that purpose.


Blah, blah, blah. Congrats, your posts have bored the hell out of me. I even read it in monotone.

Troll on, Dan.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
carl_english
General Manager
Posts: 7,703
And1: 3,140
Joined: Jun 07, 2011

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1393 » by carl_english » Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:52 pm

No wonder there's no highlights of Wiggins from the NM game ><.
User avatar
Hero
RealGM
Posts: 38,325
And1: 53,515
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Location: Edward Gardens
 

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1394 » by Hero » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:01 pm

The Wiggins and Jabari scenario reminds me of Lebron and Melo in the 03 draft. There was a lot of hype behind Lebrons athleticism while being considered a weak jump shooter.

He was also considered very raw and had a long way to go in developing his skills. He was also coming to the NBA straight out of high school.

Melo on the other hand played in college, and while their was a lot of hype behind Lebron and his athleticism (Wiggins) Melo was considered more developed, less raw and was considered the safer option (Jabari).

Lebrons potential defensively and all around was crazy (Wiggins). He was also the hometown hero much like Wiggins would be for Toronto.

Melo was considered a natural scorer who could play both the SF or PF (Jabari) and while his scoring was there and would continue to improve, defensively he wouldnt improve by much.

My point with all this is for those saying go with Jabari or go with someone whos safer needs to understand its not just Wiggins being from Toronto that he needs to come here.

His athleticism is the once every generation type much like Lebron. Wiggins has more risk but the reward is even greater if he develops properly.


We really should stop comparing Wiggins to LeBron. It's not fair to him at all.

I do see the Parker/Melo similarity. Hopefully for Parker he turns out better...

Wiggins is very athletic. No doubt about it, especially in his second jump and his speed. LeBron is on another level when you consider what he is capable of. I mean look at his highschool videos. Look at his rookie year videos when he was the same age as Wiggins is now.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOXU8FqUPOU[/youtube]

Look at 9:33, to do that as a rookie in the NBA.
Kabatnaz
Banned User
Posts: 1,389
And1: 534
Joined: Nov 15, 2012
Contact:
         

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1395 » by Kabatnaz » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:17 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:Troll on, Dan.


I love how when you don't agree with someone they're the trolls .

You won't be happy unless the entire universe agrees with your assertion that contrarily to what scouts and execs say, that Embiid is going to be better than Wiggins. Never mind that this is based off of 10 games in college.

Who is trolling who?


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,549
And1: 22,604
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1396 » by Randle McMurphy » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:26 pm

Kabatnaz wrote:I love how when you don't agree with someone they're the trolls .

No, I just have a history with Dan on these forums. I know what he is. And he's showing it again in this thread by suggesting Wiggins is a bust based on a bad December game (while obviously completely ignoring the thread during his 2 previous great games on the road).

You won't be happy unless the entire universe agrees with your assertion that contrarily to what scouts and execs say, that Embiid is going to be better than Wiggins. Never mind that this is based off of 10 games in college.

You do realize that I'm arguing in favour of Wiggins with Dan, right? That I'm saying it's ridiculous to proclaim somebody is a bust based on that kind of 10 game sample size (especially when he's actually played well)? That there is no good reason not to draft somebody like him if you're an organization like the Raptors?

No, that would take a comprehension level that you've clearly shown yourself incapable of.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Kabatnaz
Banned User
Posts: 1,389
And1: 534
Joined: Nov 15, 2012
Contact:
         

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1397 » by Kabatnaz » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:30 pm

I feed off of your sourness and bow to your internet toughness.

You win internet basketball forums.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,549
And1: 22,604
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1398 » by Randle McMurphy » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:35 pm

Kabatnaz wrote:I feed off of your sourness and bow to your internet toughness.

You win internet basketball forums.

Good to know that you'll no longer be wasting my time.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
Son Goku 25
RealGM
Posts: 26,131
And1: 41,227
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
 

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1399 » by Son Goku 25 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:36 pm

Hero wrote:
The Wiggins and Jabari scenario reminds me of Lebron and Melo in the 03 draft. There was a lot of hype behind Lebrons athleticism while being considered a weak jump shooter.

He was also considered very raw and had a long way to go in developing his skills. He was also coming to the NBA straight out of high school.

Melo on the other hand played in college, and while their was a lot of hype behind Lebron and his athleticism (Wiggins) Melo was considered more developed, less raw and was considered the safer option (Jabari).

Lebrons potential defensively and all around was crazy (Wiggins). He was also the hometown hero much like Wiggins would be for Toronto.

Melo was considered a natural scorer who could play both the SF or PF (Jabari) and while his scoring was there and would continue to improve, defensively he wouldnt improve by much.

My point with all this is for those saying go with Jabari or go with someone whos safer needs to understand its not just Wiggins being from Toronto that he needs to come here.

His athleticism is the once every generation type much like Lebron. Wiggins has more risk but the reward is even greater if he develops properly.


We really should stop comparing Wiggins to LeBron. It's not fair to him at all.

I do see the Parker/Melo similarity. Hopefully for Parker he turns out better...

Wiggins is very athletic. No doubt about it, especially in his second jump and his speed. LeBron is on another level when you consider what he is capable of. I mean look at his highschool videos. Look at his rookie year videos when he was the same age as Wiggins is now.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOXU8FqUPOU[/youtube]

Look at 9:33, to do that as a rookie in the NBA.

I don't think its fair to any player if people compare them to Lebron. My goodness, that play around 9:40 how he took it from the other end and how fast he threw it down. When you watch Lebron, even in high school, he had this unique set of skills that didn't just include passing but court awareness. It's as if he's a few steps ahead of everyone else, then you factor in his pure strength, athleticism, and how his body is built I'm not sure if we'll ever see a guy like him who doesn't have any weakness but is perfect at everything.
Read
Error 404
Ballboy
Posts: 43
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 22, 2012

Re: OT: Andrew Wiggins Discussion Thread 

Post#1400 » by Error 404 » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:29 am

People tend to hate a lot on speculative questions made by ballboys, so I'll preface my question with some notes:

1. I don't know if it's been asked in this thread and am not willing to look
2. This comparison is asked to be considered on a talent level and not directly a skill set level whilst there are still various skills that do fall in line between the two
3. This comparison is being made for the players at the same age/relatively close. Not for one whos barely had a career to be compared to one who's had more than a lengthy one
4. I realize that circumstances are different in who the Raptors had on their team at the times these players were/would be introduced. I have little knowledge on the prior one and do not wish to be ridiculed for it.

Finally the question:

Can Andrew Wiggins be as good as and have as much of an impact as Vince Carter did in his first few years on the Raps?

I ask out of personal interest, because if Wiggins can have that impact I'm willing to watch us have some **** seasons. And I trust and respect the opinions and knowledge of the posters on this board. Thanks

Return to Toronto Raptors