ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXV

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,183
And1: 22,599
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1041 » by nate33 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:36 pm

ozthegandp wrote:Man why is every team popping up in trade rumors except us. What is grunfeld doing?

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app

To be fair, Grunfeld's office doesn't leak much. Lack of rumors is not necessarily a lack of activity.
SterlingThunder
Banned User
Posts: 1
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 17, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1042 » by SterlingThunder » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:37 pm

ozthegandp wrote:Man why is every team popping up in trade rumors except us. What is grunfeld doing?

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app



Hopefully his job. The trade rumors that "pop up" typically don't happen, they are there to simply stir the pot and create interest/test the waters.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1043 » by Dat2U » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:38 pm

ozthegandp wrote:Man why is every team popping up in trade rumors except us. What is grunfeld doing?

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app


Our trade options are somewhat limited because of a lack of assets that other teams want (Ariza or Porter?) and the inability to take on any salary because were right up against the luxury tax line.

We can't even cut a guaranteed contract and sign a veteran without getting dangerously close to paying the tax.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1044 » by jivelikenice » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:40 pm

Nivek wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Changing the subject (awww), should the Wiz make a run at Faried? He's playing 24 minutes a game and taking a lot of criticism for his defense (and his defensive on/off numbers are terrible). Still, his PER is over 19, he remains a tremendous rebounder, and he's an efficient scorer (though one that lacks shooting range). I get the impression Denver is looking to trade him before his rookie contract runs out (after next season).


Yes, they should. As a low-minute starter, Faried faces just about the toughest competition possible.


Would you offer Otto? That's the only piece I can see being of interest to them unless they'd trade him for less in exchange for taking a contract off their hands (i.e. Wilson Chandler?)

Ariza/ Booker for Hickson/ Chandler works. Denver gets 2 expirings and Ariza has been better than Wilson this yr.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1045 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:50 pm

SterlingThunder wrote:
ozthegandp wrote:Man why is every team popping up in trade rumors except us. What is grunfeld doing?

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app



Hopefully his job. The trade rumors that "pop up" typically don't happen, they are there to simply stir the pot and create interest/test the waters.


yeah but im there are not even rumors of any activity or any interest in any player. hell we're not even mentioned as a possible destination for any player known to be on the block.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1046 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:57 pm

Ariza for Asik straight up.

I've seen enough of Gortat already to tell he isn't the rim protector we need to be successful. Get Asik now, give Porter the minutes he needs to develop and use Gortat as a bench guy until we move him at the deadline for bench depth.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,183
And1: 22,599
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1047 » by nate33 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:03 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Ariza for Asik straight up.

I've seen enough of Gortat already to tell he isn't the rim protector we need to be successful. Get Asik now, give Porter the minutes he needs to develop and use Gortat as a bench guy until we move him at the deadline for bench depth.

It would be nice, but I just don't see Houston pulling the trigger.

If we did this, I would follow up by trading Gortat to OKC for Perkins and Adams. With Asik and Adams manning the paint, we'd have the center position taken care of for years. All that would be left would be to somehow acquire a quality stretch four.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1048 » by jivelikenice » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:04 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dangermouse wrote:Why dont we just bring Satoransky over instead of trading his rights?

Guarantee he is better than Maynor

Guarantee he's too slow to play the point in the NBA.


He can't be slower than Maynor. Maynor can't even get us into out offense until there are about 7 seconds left on the clock. He's a potential combo guard. No reason to give him away unless he's the final piece a team needs to make a trade that would give us a potential piece to the puzzle.
Weganator
Ballboy
Posts: 29
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 17, 2013
Location: SE DC
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1049 » by Weganator » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:08 pm

jivelikenice wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
dangermouse wrote:Why dont we just bring Satoransky over instead of trading his rights?

Guarantee he is better than Maynor

Guarantee he's too slow to play the point in the NBA.


He can't be slower than Maynor. Maynor can't even get us into out offense until there are about 7 seconds left on the clock. He's a potential combo guard. No reason to give him away unless he's the final piece a team needs to make a trade that would give us a potential piece to the puzzle.


I'm a big fan of Sato, I think the bigger concern is he won't want to come over here and get the 'Jan Vesely Development' treatment where he doesn't get any PT because our coach is always one step away from being fired so he is afraid to develop talent.

The Lin trade was just an idea that crossed my mind because I find it unlikely Sato will ever want to play for DC and much less likely if Ves ends up leaving at the end of the year.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1050 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:09 pm

Whats disappointing is that there are rumors that Morey would settle for a 1st.

Ernie strikes out again, we could have had Asik for the same deal as we used for Gortat most likely. Emeka would have been great as a backup center in the playoffs and late in the season for them as well.

That Adams move sounds great though.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1051 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:10 pm

jivelikenice wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
dangermouse wrote:Why dont we just bring Satoransky over instead of trading his rights?

Guarantee he is better than Maynor

Guarantee he's too slow to play the point in the NBA.


He can't be slower than Maynor. Maynor can't even get us into out offense until there are about 7 seconds left on the clock. He's a potential combo guard. No reason to give him away unless he's the final piece a team needs to make a trade that would give us a potential piece to the puzzle.

You have as good a chance as Sato to being the final piece a team needs for anything - unless there's a new NBA quota for big slow Eruo PG's.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,183
And1: 22,599
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1052 » by nate33 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:18 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Whats disappointing is that there are rumors that Morey would settle for a 1st.

Ernie strikes out again, we could have had Asik for the same deal as we used for Gortat most likely. Emeka would have been great as a backup center in the playoffs and late in the season for them as well.

That Adams move sounds great though.

Rumor is that we offered Okafor and a protected 1st for Asik before we made the offer for Gortat, but Houston declined. At the time, Morey was driving an unreasonably hard bargain and demanding two 1st round picks in any Asik trade. I think the market is finally convincing Morey that he isn't going to get what he wants.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1053 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:31 pm

jivelikenice wrote:
Nivek wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Changing the subject (awww), should the Wiz make a run at Faried? He's playing 24 minutes a game and taking a lot of criticism for his defense (and his defensive on/off numbers are terrible). Still, his PER is over 19, he remains a tremendous rebounder, and he's an efficient scorer (though one that lacks shooting range). I get the impression Denver is looking to trade him before his rookie contract runs out (after next season).


Yes, they should. As a low-minute starter, Faried faces just about the toughest competition possible.


Would you offer Otto? That's the only piece I can see being of interest to them unless they'd trade him for less in exchange for taking a contract off their hands (i.e. Wilson Chandler?)

Ariza/ Booker for Hickson/ Chandler works. Denver gets 2 expirings and Ariza has been better than Wilson this yr.


I would, and I continue to think Porter is going to be a good pro. Faried is already extremely productive, he's young, and he fits a need. Plus, he's exactly the kind of guy who gets undervalued by other GMs, so it's reasonably likely that he's going to be underpaid for the production he provides even when he gets his next contract. Plus, it locks in a young PF for the close to inevitable (at least in my view) re-signings of Gortat and Ariza.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1054 » by jivelikenice » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:40 pm

So that would leave us with a lineup going forward of....
Wall/?
Beal/Webster/Rice
Ariza/Webster
Faried/ Nene
Gortat/Nene

Depending on what they could do to fill the combo guard hole, what kind of upside does that team have?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1055 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:41 pm

Nivek wrote:
jivelikenice wrote:
Nivek wrote:
Yes, they should. As a low-minute starter, Faried faces just about the toughest competition possible.


Would you offer Otto? That's the only piece I can see being of interest to them unless they'd trade him for less in exchange for taking a contract off their hands (i.e. Wilson Chandler?)

Ariza/ Booker for Hickson/ Chandler works. Denver gets 2 expirings and Ariza has been better than Wilson this yr.


I would, and I continue to think Porter is going to be a good pro. Faried is already extremely productive, he's young, and he fits a need. Plus, he's exactly the kind of guy who gets undervalued by other GMs, so it's reasonably likely that he's going to be underpaid for the production he provides even when he gets his next contract. Plus, it locks in a young PF for the close to inevitable (at least in my view) re-signings of Gortat and Ariza.

You've convinced me, fwiw (that and $1.25 will get you a chocolate glazed donut at Dunkin Donuts).
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1056 » by Ruzious » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:42 pm

jivelikenice wrote:So that would leave us with a lineup going forward of....
Wall/?
Beal/Webster/Rice
Ariza/Webster
Faried/ Nene
Gortat/Nene

Depending on what they could do to fill the combo guard hole, what kind of upside does that team have?

Pretty good if you can get a bench. So far, our GM has not been able to do that.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1057 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:46 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:Whats disappointing is that there are rumors that Morey would settle for a 1st.

Ernie strikes out again, we could have had Asik for the same deal as we used for Gortat most likely. Emeka would have been great as a backup center in the playoffs and late in the season for them as well.

That Adams move sounds great though.

Rumor is that we offered Okafor and a protected 1st for Asik before we made the offer for Gortat, but Houston declined. At the time, Morey was driving an unreasonably hard bargain and demanding two 1st round picks in any Asik trade. I think the market is finally convincing Morey that he isn't going to get what he wants.


That's good to know. Unfortunate it had to work out that way.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1058 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:56 pm

My only concern with Faried is how much better is he than Booker really? Stats seem similar. Faried is clearly better, but I wonder how much of that is him just being healthier and getting more development on a team that didn't have an option at PF.

In either case I wouldn't trade Porter for him and I'd still be shocked if we extended Ariza at this point. Yes, he's performing better this year, but his role is the same and he was still hitting the long ball at a nice clip last year. I don't understand why we'd draft Porter if we thought extending both Webb and Trevor were real possibilities.

It would have made more sense to move Porter during the draft while his value was at its highest or maybe traded down to get Adams and or Len, maybe even going with Noel.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,797
And1: 20,371
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1059 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:00 pm

NBA Players Not going anywhere

Nene Hilario, Bradley Beal, Martell Webster, John Wall

NBA Players not locked down

Trevor Booker, Marcin Gortat, Trevor Ariza

TBD

Otto Porter Jr., Glen Rice Jr.

Time to Go

Al Harrington, Jan Vesely, Kevin Seraphin, Chris Singleton, Eric Maynor and Garrett Temple

It seems like you need 8 or 9 NBA players and 1-2 superstars or near superstars to compete.

===========

I just don't see the plan at this point. I guess we can hope that Wall/Beal turn into superstars. But we could easily lose Gortat/Booker/Ariza at the end of the year and be down to 4 legit NBA players while hoping that Porter/Rice make a quick jump.

Seeing as how Maynor/Harrington were the signings for last year - it doesn't leave me hopeful.
ozthegandp
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 20
Joined: Nov 18, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXV 

Post#1060 » by ozthegandp » Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:39 pm

how bout maynor and seraphin for ridnour. the bucks are trying to develop their young guys and tank so ridnour isnt getting any playing time.

Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using RealGM Forums mobile app

Return to Washington Wizards