ImageImage

OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#81 » by mrknowitall215 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:23 pm

ball teacher wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
Bobcats Could Make Kidd-Gilchrist Available In Trade Talks


Am I the only person that comprehend the emphasized 'could' in this rumor? Based on the way that it's worded, it's only conjecture


I comprehend the conjecture that MKG COULD be traded. I've said weeks ago that based on the way Clifford uses MKG that he COULD be traded away which is why I said "Kinda saw this coming". And for the record, traditionally, you dont make it known that your willing to trade away a certain player unless you really dont mind trading away that specific player. I just asked why, is he now on the block, is it because he's perceived as injury prone, or because Clifford doesnt value what he brings to the team. I think it's clear that since Clifford came aboard, he wasnt impressed with MKG's game and that he's really done his best to limit his role on the team, at least offensively.


Based on the underlined quotables, I still don't think you comprehend what I mean by conjecture. It's not known if Cho is even considering or listening to trades for MKG
Image
ball teacher
Starter
Posts: 2,409
And1: 259
Joined: Feb 06, 2010

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#82 » by ball teacher » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:24 pm

BlackOutBobcat wrote:Like I said before, it's pretty much a non-story that's only being talked about because the only trade news lately involves the superstar known as Omer Asik. The pundits seem bored. I mean, the Thunder "could" make Westbrook available, doesn't mean they would.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Westbrook is not available, but we know that MKG is, so it is a issue. When managemant leaks that a player "could" be available, it means they are open to hearing offers for him (solely) because theyre willing to part ways with the player for whatever reason.
"Thou shalt not test basketball Mcjesus at the rim or ye shall receive the forearm of righteousness" Flip Murray
Image
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,574
And1: 14,280
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#83 » by HornetJail » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:26 pm

Remember the BS rumor around draft time when we were reportedly looking to trade MKG so that we could select Otto Porter?

Yeah.
investigate Adam Silver
ball teacher
Starter
Posts: 2,409
And1: 259
Joined: Feb 06, 2010

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#84 » by ball teacher » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:33 pm

mrknowitall215 wrote:
ball teacher wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
Am I the only person that comprehend the emphasized 'could' in this rumor? Based on the way that it's worded, it's only conjecture


I comprehend the conjecture that MKG COULD be traded. I've said weeks ago that based on the way Clifford uses MKG that he COULD be traded away which is why I said "Kinda saw this coming". And for the record, traditionally, you dont make it known that your willing to trade away a certain player unless you really dont mind trading away that specific player. I just asked why, is he now on the block, is it because he's perceived as injury prone, or because Clifford doesnt value what he brings to the team. I think it's clear that since Clifford came aboard, he wasnt impressed with MKG's game and that he's really done his best to limit his role on the team, at least offensively.


Based on the underlined quotables, I still don't think you comprehend what I mean by conjecture. It's not known if Cho is even considering or listening to trades for MKG



The only thing conjecture could be made of is who in the organisation decided they'd be willing to trade MKG. Teams dont let it be known players could be traded away when they have no intention of trading him. I think from what we've all seen of his minutes and reduced role on the team that this isn't some rumor with no basis in reality.
"Thou shalt not test basketball Mcjesus at the rim or ye shall receive the forearm of righteousness" Flip Murray
Image
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#85 » by BlackOutBuzz » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:33 pm

ball teacher wrote:
BlackOutBobcat wrote:Like I said before, it's pretty much a non-story that's only being talked about because the only trade news lately involves the superstar known as Omer Asik. The pundits seem bored. I mean, the Thunder "could" make Westbrook available, doesn't mean they would.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Westbrook is not available, but we know that MKG is, so it is a issue.


Because Chad Ford speculated it? Wasn't it only in a chat or something? I don't even think he put it into an article since it was only conjecture. Sheridan on the other hand ran with it, though I'm sure Ford is his source.

Even if it were a legit leak, we also heard this stuff at the draft. There's no way you can "know" MKG's available from a reporter's offhand comment.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#86 » by BlackOutBuzz » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:40 pm

ball teacher wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
ball teacher wrote:
I comprehend the conjecture that MKG COULD be traded. I've said weeks ago that based on the way Clifford uses MKG that he COULD be traded away which is why I said "Kinda saw this coming". And for the record, traditionally, you dont make it known that your willing to trade away a certain player unless you really dont mind trading away that specific player. I just asked why, is he now on the block, is it because he's perceived as injury prone, or because Clifford doesnt value what he brings to the team. I think it's clear that since Clifford came aboard, he wasnt impressed with MKG's game and that he's really done his best to limit his role on the team, at least offensively.


Based on the underlined quotables, I still don't think you comprehend what I mean by conjecture. It's not known if Cho is even considering or listening to trades for MKG



This isn't some rumor with no basis in reality.


It kinda is...

And teams put out smokescreens all the time. I'm fairly convinced the Porter thing was done to encourage Washington to take him instead of trading back or something. Hell, for all we know Ford could be "hearing" this from an official of another team. It could be as simple as someone inquiring and us saying "for the right price," and then all of a sudden he's "on the block." Just look at Morey leaking they have offers on the table involving draft picks, and then it came up that we turned down his insane offer.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
ball teacher
Starter
Posts: 2,409
And1: 259
Joined: Feb 06, 2010

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#87 » by ball teacher » Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:30 pm

BlackOutBobcat wrote:
ball teacher wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:
Based on the underlined quotables, I still don't think you comprehend what I mean by conjecture. It's not known if Cho is even considering or listening to trades for MKG



This isn't some rumor with no basis in reality.


It kinda is...

And teams put out smokescreens all the time. I'm fairly convinced the Porter thing was done to encourage Washington to take him instead of trading back or something. Hell, for all we know Ford could be "hearing" this from an official of another team. It could be as simple as someone inquiring and us saying "for the right price," and then all of a sudden he's "on the block." Just look at Morey leaking they have offers on the table involving draft picks, and then it came up that we turned down his insane offer.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app


I hope you're right that this has no basis in reality, but from the article that was originally, posted it stated MKG could be made available when he returns from injury. If this was from some other team, the article should've stated "it is rumored that MKG could be available". The fact that the article clearly says he could be available, and since this is something I already stated was inevitable due to the statements from the very beginning about MKG from this coach, all leads me to think this was a statement that was put out by the front office to gauge the level of interest in the guy. Using smokescreens in the draft is one thing, what would the motive be for a smokescreen at this point?
"Thou shalt not test basketball Mcjesus at the rim or ye shall receive the forearm of righteousness" Flip Murray
Image
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#88 » by MasterIchiro » Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:46 pm

ball teacher wrote:
BlackOutBobcat wrote:
ball teacher wrote:

This isn't some rumor with no basis in reality.


It kinda is...

And teams put out smokescreens all the time. I'm fairly convinced the Porter thing was done to encourage Washington to take him instead of trading back or something. Hell, for all we know Ford could be "hearing" this from an official of another team. It could be as simple as someone inquiring and us saying "for the right price," and then all of a sudden he's "on the block." Just look at Morey leaking they have offers on the table involving draft picks, and then it came up that we turned down his insane offer.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using RealGM Forums mobile app


I hope you're right that this has no basis in reality, but from the article that was originally, posted it stated MKG could be made available when he returns from injury. If this was from some other team, the article should've stated "it is rumored that MKG could be available". The fact that the article clearly says he could be available, and since this is something I already stated was inevitable due to the statements from the very beginning about MKG from this coach, all leads me to think this was a statement that was put out by the front office to gauge the level of interest in the guy. Using smokescreens in the draft is one thing, what would the motive be for a smokescreen at this point?


Good question.
It has been written...
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#89 » by mrknowitall215 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:46 am

I don't understand the notion of the doubters that state that MKG is a bust or anything close to it, but act like Kawhi Leonard & Jimmy Butler are some kind of rising stars in this league. MKG is already putting up similar to better numbers than both of them, and he's every bit of 2-4 years younger

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,223
And1: 45,834
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#90 » by JDR720 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:51 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:I don't understand the notion of the doubters that state that MKG is a bust or anything close to it, but act like Kawhi Leonard & Jimmy Butler are some kind of rising stars in this league. MKG is already putting up similar to better numbers than both of them, and he's every bit of 2-4 years younger

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014

it just blows my mind, they call him a bust because he isn't a scorer and was drafted #2, evidently if your not putting up 20ppg or making all-star teams your a bust
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#91 » by catch20two » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:57 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:I don't understand the notion of the doubters that state that MKG is a bust or anything close to it, but act like Kawhi Leonard & Jimmy Butler are some kind of rising stars in this league. MKG is already putting up similar to better numbers than both of them, and he's every bit of 2-4 years younger

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2014

It's beyond me. It's just people looking at things in a microwave state of mind as if MKG was supposed to come into the league averaging 20-5-5 like LeBron and Melo or something. Nobody from that draft class had that lofty of expectations except Anthony Davis to Tim Duncan. I believe MKG will be averaging at least 13 points by next season and will continually grow from there. You would've thought he was averaging 5 points on 30% shooting the way people criticize his offense in limited minutes. Iguodala didn't even average over 12 points until his 3rd year.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,223
And1: 45,834
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#92 » by JDR720 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 4:58 am

If your gonna call him a bust dont do it because he is underachieving as a "#2" pick he couldn't do anything about getting drafted #2 overall, and calling him a bust because he "cant" shoot is also dumb, he is statistically our best midrange shooter this season
User avatar
catch20two
RealGM
Posts: 21,424
And1: 4,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2012
       

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#93 » by catch20two » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:00 am

JDR720 wrote:If your gonna call him a bust dont do it because he is underachieving as a "#2" pick he couldn't do anything about getting drafted #2 overall, and calling him a bust because he "cant" shoot is also dumb, he is statistically our best midrange shooter this season

That's the thing. MKG isn't even a bad shooter. He just have a very awkward form.
They will wage war against the Lamb but the Lamb will triumph them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings - and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers." Revelation 17:14 (NIV)
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#94 » by mrknowitall215 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:06 am

I doubt that they would, but the very moment that Charlotte does trade MKG, the very same misanthropist that are calling him a 'bust', disappointment, or anything alike, will become revisionists that'll have a field day denigrating Michael Jordan for trading him away too early in his career
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,223
And1: 45,834
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#95 » by JDR720 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:10 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:I doubt that they would, but the very moment that Charlotte does trade MKG, the very same misanthropist that are calling him a 'bust', disappointment, or anything alike, will become revisionists that'll have a field day denigrating Michael Jordan for trading him away too early in his career

if they are dumb enough to trade him, i hope he gets a quadruple double his 1st game back in Charlotte goes flying into the crowd after a loose ball and knees MJ in the face
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,257
And1: 6,263
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#96 » by JMAC3 » Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:43 am

You would have to think we are seriously considering moving up the time table for MKG to return. I think once he gets his cast off we should give him a look. If he is a liability then sit him, but we literally have nothing else. Especially with Taylor probably out for a good time, if not the remainder of the season.

Even if its a limited MKG, he will go out there to just play defense, rebound, and score 5 points a night. It is better than what Tolliver and CDR would bring to the table. That or we need to think about dealing for a quality wing player, even if it is just somebody we could get for a second round pick.

I really do not want to make a deal if it means trading MKG. We need to bolster the SF position either way, because Taylor looks like he is gonna miss major time.
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#97 » by mrknowitall215 » Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:51 am

MKG is not going to score no 5 points a night just because he injured his off hand upon his return. He's going to hit the ground running when he's re-inserted into the lineup as if he never left. Charlotte doesn't need to make no wild trade, even with a 2nd rounder, just for a spare SF. Chris Douglas-Roberts is perfectly capable of filling the void that'll be left by Jeff Taylor if indeed his heel injury is as serious as season-ending
Image
User avatar
lmcguir5
Pro Prospect
Posts: 923
And1: 83
Joined: Nov 05, 2012

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#98 » by lmcguir5 » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:00 am

mrknowitall215 wrote:MKG is not going to score no 5 points a night just because he injured his off hand upon his return. He's going to hit the ground running when he's re-inserted into the lineup as if he never left. Charlotte doesn't need to make no wild trade, even with a 2nd rounder, just for a spare SF. Chris Douglas-Roberts is perfectly capable of filling the void that'll be left by Jeff Taylor if indeed his heel injury is as serious as season-ending


I'm about to rename CDR the messiah the way you guys talk about him. He's not proven in any sense, you guys need to temper your expectations
Mike Malone was never given a fair chance in Sacramento, and Ranadive will soon come to regret that, when he's on top of the WC inevitably contending somewhere
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,574
And1: 14,280
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#99 » by HornetJail » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:01 am

lmcguir5 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:MKG is not going to score no 5 points a night just because he injured his off hand upon his return. He's going to hit the ground running when he's re-inserted into the lineup as if he never left. Charlotte doesn't need to make no wild trade, even with a 2nd rounder, just for a spare SF. Chris Douglas-Roberts is perfectly capable of filling the void that'll be left by Jeff Taylor if indeed his heel injury is as serious as season-ending


I'm about to rename CDR the messiah the way you guys talk about him. He's not proven in any sense, you guys need to temper your expectations

I've watched him play and I really do think that he can be a solid role player. I'm actually quite surprised he hasn't been able to stick with a team. If it's true that he has extended his range, then I really want him to start over Tolliver.
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: OMFKG! The Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Thread II 

Post#100 » by mrknowitall215 » Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:08 am

lmcguir5 wrote:
mrknowitall215 wrote:MKG is not going to score no 5 points a night just because he injured his off hand upon his return. He's going to hit the ground running when he's re-inserted into the lineup as if he never left. Charlotte doesn't need to make no wild trade, even with a 2nd rounder, just for a spare SF. Chris Douglas-Roberts is perfectly capable of filling the void that'll be left by Jeff Taylor if indeed his heel injury is as serious as season-ending


I'm about to rename CDR the messiah the way you guys talk about him. He's not proven in any sense, you guys need to temper your expectations


CDR is no "messiah", but he is very much the player that most of you wanted out of Jeff Taylor, but could never quite get it consistently, only once out of every other 10 or so games. Let's just say, you won't have to keep saying "if" & "when" with CDR the way how you all did constantly with Taylor, because CDR is a productive player. He can shoot, attack the rim, dribble, defend, and etc. He's not a project
Image

Return to Charlotte Hornets