Omer Asik Trade - Updated link pg.109

ddb · Post #1441 » by **ddb** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:27 am

I still think at the end of the day Asik is in Boston, TYoung in Houston and expirings and pick or picks to Philly

Valid · Post #1442 » by **Valid** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:27 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:

LMAO

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I wonder if this was before or after Morey's tweet.

jirrit · Post #1443 » by **jirrit** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:28 am

Celtic Esquire wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
Celtic Esquire wrote:
Asik is a better rebounding version of Kendrick Perkins. No thanks.

Full link to stats:

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/8370/ckm2.png

http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5904/ng0l.png

A better version of Perk at his best? How is that bad?

It's bad when we are giving up two rotation players plus a #1 pick (possibly a 2014 pick according to reports) for a better rebounding version of Perkins.

Bass takes away minutes from Sully and KO at the 4 while Lee is almost gonna get DNP's as soon as Rondo returns. Plus they both have a 2 and 3 year contract going. I really don't see why we would not settle for a deal like this.

BRUNiNHO91 · Post #1444 » by **BRUNiNHO91** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:28 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:

LMAO

Holy crap!LMAO! :lol:

Valid · Post #1445 » by **Valid** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:28 am

You know who is enjoying us not getting Asik more than anyone right now?

BRUNiNHO91 · Post #1446 » by **BRUNiNHO91** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:31 am

Who-rod wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Who-rod wrote:
Do we have to get Richardson? Ugh.

No. We can easily remove Richardson, Lee, the Miami's and Keith Bogans or Bass from the deal. My whole thought process was sweetening up the deal for Philly allowing them to get one expiring, one big man, Bass and a first while getting rid of Richardson. It would also be a way for us to fit Lee into the trade.

I see them have zero interest in Bass. I think straight expirings and pick(s) would be the ticket with Philly these days. Bass might help them win 2-3 games they have no interest in winning.

That's true. But whatever it is that they need or want we have it for them as long as they cough up Thaddeus and get us Asik. I'm sure Danny wouldn't mind giving away Bogans instead of Bass anyway. Bass is well worth his salary IMO.

Captain_Caveman · Post #1447 » by **Captain_Caveman** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:32 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:

LMAO

Holy crap!LMAO!

Psst... not real.

Just funny as hell. LOL @ "refused". As if someone demanded he do it and he said no.

Valid · Post #1448 » by **Valid** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:33 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:

LMAO

Holy crap!LMAO!

Psst... not real.

Just funny as hell. LOL @ "refused". As if someone demanded he do it and he said no.

It's funny because I checked Woj's Twitter and saw that the tweet wasn't there and was wondering if Woj deleted it. :lol:

Who-rod · Post #1449 » by **Who-rod** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:34 am

jirrit wrote:
Celtic Esquire wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
A better version of Perk at his best? How is that bad?

It's bad when we are giving up two rotation players plus a #1 pick (possibly a 2014 pick according to reports) for a better rebounding version of Perkins.

Bass takes away minutes from Sully and KO at the 4 while Lee is almost gonna get DNP's as soon as Rondo returns. Plus they both have a 2 and 3 year contract going. I really don't see why we would not settle for a deal like this.

Agree. Getting rid of those two is probably not much of a loss. I don't want to lose a '14 draft pick though.

Pogue Mahone · Post #1450 » by **Pogue Mahone** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:35 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:

LMAO

Holy crap!LMAO!

Psst... not real.

Just funny as hell. LOL @ "refused". As if someone demanded he do it and he said no.

I started to reply and saw "tinypic.com". My first response to shake my first and curse at the sky. Then I couldn't control the giggles.

Of course, the last part may be a side of effect of my herbal supplements

Fidel Sarcasmo · Post #1451 » by **Fidel Sarcasmo** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:39 am

That's a 7 footer refusing to flush. that's a looooooonnnnnggg rope!

Post #1452 » by **SuperDeluxe** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:43 am

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:That's a 7 footer refusing to flush.

I assume that by "7 footer" you mean the player, no?

Fidel Sarcasmo · Post #1453 » by **Fidel Sarcasmo** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:47 am

tell me thats a fake twitter account saying that. that can't be real news from Adrien W. Tell me that's fake…

Captain_Caveman · Post #1454 » by **Captain_Caveman** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:48 am

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:That's a 7 footer refusing to flush.

I assume that by "7 footer" you mean the player, no?

Let's hope so, lol.

Maybe flushing a 7-footer on a plane isn't the best idea. Could end up depressurizing the cabin or exploding the septic tank.

Pogue Mahone · Post #1455 » by **Pogue Mahone** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:49 am

Maybe he was unable to flush? I mean, I have had an Irish Wolfhound and a Jack Russell Terrier. The Wolfhound had turds as big as the terrier, it seemed. I would imagine if you are as a big as Asik, you might need to tag out on that one and have a low-level staffer take over plunging duties.

Pogue Mahone · Post #1456 » by **Pogue Mahone** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:53 am

That's it!

The reason that Morey wants to trade Asik is that on top of his hefty $15M outlay in 2014-15, they also have to keep replacing the septic tank on the team plane. I would imagine that gets pretty costly with 41 road games, not including playoffs.

Post #1457 » by **SuperDeluxe** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:55 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:Maybe flushing a 7-footer on a plane isn't the best idea. Could end up depressurizing the cabin or exploding the septic tank.

LOL! I have a flight coming up. Will let you know what happens.

Fidel Sarcasmo · Post #1458 » by **Fidel Sarcasmo** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:59 am

SuperDeluxe wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Maybe flushing a 7-footer on a plane isn't the best idea. Could end up depressurizing the cabin or exploding the septic tank.

LOL! I have a flight coming up. Will let you know what happens.

Now hold on there Super Deluxe!! :lol:

Didn't you just tell Caveman and I to get back on topic after i asked him about a violent scene in a cleveland bus? And here you are going on n on about poop? lol

SrongwitU??

Post #1459 » by **SuperDeluxe** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:02 am

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:
SuperDeluxe wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Maybe flushing a 7-footer on a plane isn't the best idea. Could end up depressurizing the cabin or exploding the septic tank.

LOL! I have a flight coming up. Will let you know what happens.

Now hold on there Super Deluxe!! Didn't you just tell Caveman and I to get back on topic after i asked him about a violent scene in a cleveland bus? And here you are going on n on about poop? lol

SrongwitU??

It wasn't me. I'm all for proving things via the scientific method, by the way.

Marley2Hendrix · Post #1460 » by **Marley2Hendrix** » Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:10 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
SuperDeluxe wrote:
Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:That's a 7 footer refusing to flush.

I assume that by "7 footer" you mean the player, no?

Let's hope so, lol.

Maybe flushing a 7-footer on a plane isn't the best idea. Could end up depressurizing the cabin or exploding the septic tank.

Man, I can't imagine what would've happened had the creators of LOST stumbled across this tweet prior to stumbling into season 4 and beyond... oh the possibilities.

ETA - "HURLEY, YOU NEED TO FLUSH TO SAVE THE ISLAND, NOOOOOOWWWWW!!!!!!"