Kabatnaz wrote:roundhead0 wrote:Kabatnaz wrote:
And all these champs the last 7 years did so by signing talent; not drafting it.
Look at the history of all the teams that are synonymous with tanking. Look at their reputations.
The perpetual tank does nothing for this franchise and there isn't a single player in this draft that is going to turn this team into a 60+ win franchise; especially if we trade a high value player.
Then what? Tank some more. What if our pick this year is a bust? Keep tanking?
Tanking doesn't work.
Agauin with the strawmen. No one claims that tanking is a guarantee. N one claims that a single drafted player will turn this team into a 60+ win franchise. Only the strawmen arguments liek yours make that claim.
The arms race in the NBA has shot up dramaticaly. That is why teams like New York and Brooklyn had to sell their futures to acquire so many good players now, and why a team like Houston was not content with Harden and added Howard and will look to add another top-level talent: because they know that simply building good teams with good players IS NOT ENOUGH. You need franchise players to attract other all-star calibre players in order to really have a chance aside from just getting lucky.
YOU NEED TALENT TO ATTRACT TALENT. That's the way it is now. Treadmilling will not get you the talent that you need to get the other talent. Basically, by advocating trying to get these few wins now instead of willing to build in a way to actually win you have adopted a permanent loser mentality.
Permanent loser mentality by winning basketball games.
...
Lol
Yep: loser mentality. You're so afraid of taking a chance that you willingly embrace virtually guaranteed failure instead. That is a loser mentality.












