PC Board All-Time Fantasy League Project - Discussion Thread

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#21 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:16 am

Quotatious wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:So peak years for everyone or any year, up to the GM?

No sense to debate consensus peak years for every player. It'd take way too much time. Let everyone take whoever they want in whichever year they want. It's up to you who you choose is what kind of results you can expect.

Obviously there's no way you can pick, for example, 91 Jordan and the other GM takes 88 Jordan. It'd be just stupid to have two versions of the same guy on two different teams.


Oh yeah definitely not. You choose Jordan, and regardless of the year you choose, no one else can pick Jordan. Different years of the same player would get into that same debate we want to avoid, those of peak years and ranking player years.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
Notanoob
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1,223
Joined: Jun 07, 2013

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#22 » by Notanoob » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:27 am

If we're going by peaks, how do we evaluate injured players? For instance, do we just go with the best Penny that we saw, or a theoretical peak Penny who's a bit better in a few facets, without adding something to his game that he didn't ever prove to have? Or how about Grant Hill? Are we forced to go with '98 Hill, or can we go theoretical peak Hill and add 3 point range to the uninjured version, seeing as he proved he could stroke it from deep, but didn't get the chance to show it off when healthy? Or even Sabonis, could we go with international play Sabonis, seeing as even coming off an ACL tear he beat the Admiral head to head (IIRC)?
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#23 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:30 am

Notanoob wrote:If we're going by peaks, how do we evaluate injured players? For instance, do we just go with the best Penny that we saw, or a theoretical peak Penny who's a bit better in a few facets, without adding something to his game that he didn't ever prove to have? Or how about Grant Hill? Are we forced to go with '98 Hill, or can we go theoretical peak Hill and add 3 point range to the uninjured version, seeing as he proved he could stroke it from deep, but didn't get the chance to show it off when healthy? Or even Sabonis, could we go with international play Sabonis, seeing as even coming off an ACL tear he beat the Admiral head to head (IIRC)?


Well, as Quotatious said and I agreed with him, it's better to leave it up to the GM which year they want to choose. So you can only choose real years, not what Hill could have been or Penny could have been or any other player. You don't even have to choose the best year of your player. If you think a certain player plays a better role on your team in his non-peak years then you can do that too.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
DHodgkins
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,375
And1: 972
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
     

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#24 » by DHodgkins » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:34 am

You should edit the OP with a list of participants, make the process easier for ya
GTGTPWTW
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#25 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:49 am

Edited the OP with list of participants. Let me know if I missed anyone
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
Notanoob
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1,223
Joined: Jun 07, 2013

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#26 » by Notanoob » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:58 am

MisterHibachi wrote:
Notanoob wrote:If we're going by peaks, how do we evaluate injured players? For instance, do we just go with the best Penny that we saw, or a theoretical peak Penny who's a bit better in a few facets, without adding something to his game that he didn't ever prove to have? Or how about Grant Hill? Are we forced to go with '98 Hill, or can we go theoretical peak Hill and add 3 point range to the uninjured version, seeing as he proved he could stroke it from deep, but didn't get the chance to show it off when healthy? Or even Sabonis, could we go with international play Sabonis, seeing as even coming off an ACL tear he beat the Admiral head to head (IIRC)?


Well, as Quotatious said and I agreed with him, it's better to leave it up to the GM which year they want to choose. So you can only choose real years, not what Hill could have been or Penny could have been or any other player. You don't even have to choose the best year of your player. If you think a certain player plays a better role on your team in his non-peak years then you can do that too.

Ahh, I figured it'd be that way, I just always liked all those unlucky dudes. Still, I think that we should consider being able to use young Sabonis since we actually saw him play and can evaluate him, unlike say Oscar Schmidt.
User avatar
Bruh Man
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 743
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Location: 5th floor
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#27 » by Bruh Man » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:59 am

Count me in.
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#28 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:07 am

Bruh Man wrote:Count me in.


Added to OP.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#29 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:10 am

Notanoob wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:
Notanoob wrote:If we're going by peaks, how do we evaluate injured players? For instance, do we just go with the best Penny that we saw, or a theoretical peak Penny who's a bit better in a few facets, without adding something to his game that he didn't ever prove to have? Or how about Grant Hill? Are we forced to go with '98 Hill, or can we go theoretical peak Hill and add 3 point range to the uninjured version, seeing as he proved he could stroke it from deep, but didn't get the chance to show it off when healthy? Or even Sabonis, could we go with international play Sabonis, seeing as even coming off an ACL tear he beat the Admiral head to head (IIRC)?


Well, as Quotatious said and I agreed with him, it's better to leave it up to the GM which year they want to choose. So you can only choose real years, not what Hill could have been or Penny could have been or any other player. You don't even have to choose the best year of your player. If you think a certain player plays a better role on your team in his non-peak years then you can do that too.

Ahh, I figured it'd be that way, I just always liked all those unlucky dudes. Still, I think that we should consider being able to use young Sabonis since we actually saw him play and can evaluate him, unlike say Oscar Schmidt.


Only his NBA years, I think. If we consider his European years, then it turns into a lot of speculation as to his impact in the NBA.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
Narigo
Veteran
Posts: 2,802
And1: 884
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#30 » by Narigo » Sat Dec 28, 2013 6:00 am

Sign me up!!!! :D
Narigo's Fantasy Team

PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan

BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
ThunderDan9
Veteran
Posts: 2,707
And1: 489
Joined: Sep 30, 2003

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#31 » by ThunderDan9 » Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:25 am

I'd like to participate as a player (GM 8-) ), please.

(I always loved fantasy drafts, an all-time draft would be great fun! Just don't take Iverson at 1/1... :D )
PC Board All Time Fantasy Draft:

PG Mark Price (92-94)
SG Manu Ginobili (05-07)
SF Larry Bird (84-86)
PF Horace Grant (93-95)
C Dwight Howard (09-11)
+
Bernard King (82-84) Vlade Divac (95-97) Derek Harper (88-90) Dan Majerle (91-93) Josh Smith (10-12)
Sagittaron
Senior
Posts: 533
And1: 150
Joined: Nov 03, 2013
   

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#32 » by Sagittaron » Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:09 pm

I would also like to participate in any way possible, I always loved all time drafts
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board All-Time Fantasy Draft 

Post#33 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:14 pm

Drafting order can be determined by an impartial mod/poster putting all the names in a randomizer list or something. We have 9 people so far. If people have questions or suggestions, put them forth, let's iron the wrinkles out.

Edit: do people think going 13 deep is too much? In the playoffs, teams usually only play about 9 guys at the max. Do guys wanna draft people who won't be getting minutes?
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#34 » by MisterHibachi » Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:16 pm

ThunderDan9 wrote:I'd like to participate as a player (GM 8-) ), please.

(I always loved fantasy drafts, an all-time draft would be great fun! Just don't take Iverson at 1/1... :D )


Good thing Barkley isn't playing lol
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
DHodgkins
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,375
And1: 972
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
     

Re: PC Board All-Time Fantasy Draft 

Post#35 » by DHodgkins » Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:24 pm

For those of you who haven't seen it, here is the TNT version of the all time fantasy draft.
IMO Reggies team was the best.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BofOXnyQWZk[/youtube]
GTGTPWTW
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,463
And1: 9,978
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#36 » by penbeast0 » Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:28 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:So if I'm understanding correctly, this is what we've done in the past as an All-Time League. I ran the first one on the board back in 2006, and we did another one soon after, but then games like this moved over to the Trade board.

I could see doing one here just because it's a different community than the Trade board, but make sure you explore what's going on over there because you might find that to be more what you want.


From what I understand the games over there are where you take current rosters and then trade with each other. I'm looking to do something different than that.

Edit: do you happen to have a link to that all-time league? I would like to see how it turned out and all the rules you implemented.


Pretty sure they've done a wide variety of games on their Games sub-board, but regardless:

Can't link to the original ATLs because stuff that old is gone (or at least not publicly accessible).

First league: 30 teams. Wilt picked first, Jordan second. tkb won with a team that had Shaq & Kobe.
Second league: 16 teams. Jordan picked first, Wilt second. penbeast0 won with a team that had Shaq & Frazier.

By "won", I mean that after completing the draft, we had a tournament where the players had to explain their general strategy and to talk specifics against each opponent they faced. Team GMs voted, and if you got more votes than your opponent, you moved on.

The first ATL had really amazing tournament arguments, the second one not so much.
The second ATL (ran by tkb), had some clear improvements for sanity: 16 teams was better than 32. If you miss your draft pick, we go on without you until you come back. Explicitly forcing GMs to declare minute and shot allocation, and these numbers had to be reasonable based on the players career. Couldn't have Bill Walton playing 36 MPG.

It was remarked upon at the time how well Shaq's teams did. Many of us may take major issues with how Shaq went about his career, but the respect given to an engaged Shaq when forced to choose the superior team was literally second-to-none.

Oh, also I'll say, because I still remember my teams:

1st ATL: I got 2nd pick, and hence 59th pick. I picked Jordan and Robert Parish. I also was able to swing a deal to acquire Charles Barkley, which I was pretty proud of. I ended up to a team led by Ewing & Isiah, which I still think was ridiculous. :lol:

2nd ATL: I got the 16th (last) first round pick, and thus the 17th and 32nd picks. I picked Garnett & Pippen with the first two, and then sung a trade where I gave up Garnett for an additional 2nd round pick and other nice picks, and made another trade along those lines along the way. So it was a team with Pippen, Artis Gilmore, Rick Barry, Steve Nash, Buck Williams, and Walton among others. I was pretty proud of it, but couldn't sell anyone on it. Out in the first round. :(

Incidentally I still like that team a lot, but my estimation of Garnett has grown since then. I doubt I'd consider trading him today.


It's also a lot about salesmanship in that format. That first ATL, I took over a team where the original owner had chosen Barkley then disappeared so I didn't get any other picks until the 5th round when they called me in. (Yes, I traded Barkley). I ended up using James Silas as my starting PG, Cliff Hagan as my starting SF, and Clyde Lovellette and Kirk Hinrich as my key bench guys but did a lot of fast talking and made it through a couple of rounds before I couldn't BS my way any further. It was also 5 year peaks rather than best season which I like (heck, make it 8 year averages and cut down the competition some more!).

We did a few variations here and they were fun;' the T&T Games board then did a few but haven't done many in the last year or two that I've seen. The problem seems to be keeping it fresh -- keeper leagues were cool, I always wanted to do one where only playoff numbers counted and you just had exactly the players eligible that would fill the rosters based on most playoff minutes but couldn't talk anyone into it.

Even if I don't participate, I'd enjoy seeing you put it together and wish you well.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board Fantasy draft 

Post#37 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:42 am

penbeast0 wrote:
Spoiler:
Doctor MJ wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:
From what I understand the games over there are where you take current rosters and then trade with each other. I'm looking to do something different than that.

Edit: do you happen to have a link to that all-time league? I would like to see how it turned out and all the rules you implemented.


Pretty sure they've done a wide variety of games on their Games sub-board, but regardless:

Can't link to the original ATLs because stuff that old is gone (or at least not publicly accessible).

First league: 30 teams. Wilt picked first, Jordan second. tkb won with a team that had Shaq & Kobe.
Second league: 16 teams. Jordan picked first, Wilt second. penbeast0 won with a team that had Shaq & Frazier.

By "won", I mean that after completing the draft, we had a tournament where the players had to explain their general strategy and to talk specifics against each opponent they faced. Team GMs voted, and if you got more votes than your opponent, you moved on.

The first ATL had really amazing tournament arguments, the second one not so much.
The second ATL (ran by tkb), had some clear improvements for sanity: 16 teams was better than 32. If you miss your draft pick, we go on without you until you come back. Explicitly forcing GMs to declare minute and shot allocation, and these numbers had to be reasonable based on the players career. Couldn't have Bill Walton playing 36 MPG.

It was remarked upon at the time how well Shaq's teams did. Many of us may take major issues with how Shaq went about his career, but the respect given to an engaged Shaq when forced to choose the superior team was literally second-to-none.

Oh, also I'll say, because I still remember my teams:

1st ATL: I got 2nd pick, and hence 59th pick. I picked Jordan and Robert Parish. I also was able to swing a deal to acquire Charles Barkley, which I was pretty proud of. I ended up to a team led by Ewing & Isiah, which I still think was ridiculous. :lol:

2nd ATL: I got the 16th (last) first round pick, and thus the 17th and 32nd picks. I picked Garnett & Pippen with the first two, and then sung a trade where I gave up Garnett for an additional 2nd round pick and other nice picks, and made another trade along those lines along the way. So it was a team with Pippen, Artis Gilmore, Rick Barry, Steve Nash, Buck Williams, and Walton among others. I was pretty proud of it, but couldn't sell anyone on it. Out in the first round. :(

Incidentally I still like that team a lot, but my estimation of Garnett has grown since then. I doubt I'd consider trading him today.


It's also a lot about salesmanship in that format. That first ATL, I took over a team where the original owner had chosen Barkley then disappeared so I didn't get any other picks until the 5th round when they called me in. (Yes, I traded Barkley). I ended up using James Silas as my starting PG, Cliff Hagan as my starting SF, and Clyde Lovellette and Kirk Hinrich as my key bench guys but did a lot of fast talking and made it through a couple of rounds before I couldn't BS my way any further. It was also 5 year peaks rather than best season which I like (heck, make it 8 year averages and cut down the competition some more!).

We did a few variations here and they were fun;' the T&T Games board then did a few but haven't done many in the last year or two that I've seen. The problem seems to be keeping it fresh -- keeper leagues were cool, I always wanted to do one where only playoff numbers counted and you just had exactly the players eligible that would fill the rosters based on most playoff minutes but couldn't talk anyone into it.

Even if I don't participate, I'd enjoy seeing you put it together and wish you well.


Thank you. If you have any suggestions about the process or the set up learned from the last one, you are welcome to provide your input.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
RSCD3_
RealGM
Posts: 13,932
And1: 7,342
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
 

Re: PC Board All-Time Fantasy Draft 

Post#38 » by RSCD3_ » Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:53 am

Count me in as well.

Sent from my SCH-I800 using RealGM Forums mobile app
I came here to do two things: get lost and slice **** up & I'm all out of directions.

Butler removing rearview mirror in his car as a symbol to never look back

Peja Stojakovic wrote:Jimmy butler, with no regard for human life
User avatar
MisterHibachi
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 19,075
Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: PC Board All-Time Fantasy Draft 

Post#39 » by MisterHibachi » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:19 am

What are thoughts on roster size? 7? 9? 10? 13? Full 15?
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
User avatar
DHodgkins
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,375
And1: 972
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
     

Re: PC Board All-Time Fantasy Draft 

Post#40 » by DHodgkins » Sun Dec 29, 2013 4:55 am

MisterHibachi wrote:What are thoughts on roster size? 7? 9? 10? 13? Full 15?


Anywhere from 10-13 depending on how many participants imo
GTGTPWTW

Return to Player Comparisons