What would you ask ATL for Sanders?

[ChuckBros4Life]

Agreed. I love Wolters, but I'd put my personal affinity for him aside if it's a deal breaker. Keeping him to back up Schröder would be rock solid though if possible. A strong 2nd unit will be major. The TWolves would be a championship contender if they had a strong bench. It's a difference maker.

[HurricaneKid]

for the sake of the conversation I would do this deal...

Henson + Middleton for Top 6 pick + Schroder + Jenkins

This is laughable. Danny Ferry would be calling GMs everywhere just to say "you'll never believe what Milwaukee just asked me..."

[Matches Malone]

for the sake of the conversation I would do this deal...

Henson + Middleton for Top 6 pick + Schroder + Jenkins

This is laughable. Danny Ferry would be calling GMs everywhere just to say "you'll never believe what Milwaukee just asked me..."

I don't see how this is laughable at all? Henson and Middleton are core pieces to this team. They have cheap contracts and have shown to be very reliable players in this league already. Schroder has done nothing yet nor has Jenkins. Atlanta already has a solid foundation and adding two legit NBA players for a top 6 pick isn't laughable in my book.

[parson]

^ You'll understand that the argument of "core pieces" on a tanking team means little to non-Milwaukee fans.

The evolution of thought on this thread has been interesting.


New question: how about Sanders and Henson for Jeff Teague? Teague's emerged as an all-star level PG and knows Drew's sytem better than anyone presently on your team.

You continue to tank and maybe draft Embiid. A frontline of Embiid, Ilyasova and Antetokounmpo is something to build on. Add a top PG like Teague and you're immediately cooking.

If you can't draft a franchise Center, you'll have the money to go after someone like Gortat and, assuming you draft a PF (not much chance you'll replace Antetokounmpo, right?), can then trade Ilyasova for SG help.

[hege53190]

New question: how about Sanders and Henson for Jeff Teague?

How about OJ Mayo for Al Horford and the Nets #1

[parson]

New question: how about Sanders and Henson for Jeff Teague?

How about OJ Mayo for Al Horford and the Nets #1

Cute. Teague's worth a lot. YOUR front office is looking to trade Sanders. Both Sanders and Henson are limited (Sanders' lack of bulk and offense - Henson's severe lack of bulk) and may never become more than they are now.

[ackypoo]

New question: how about Sanders and Henson for Jeff Teague?

How about OJ Mayo for Al Horford and the Nets #1

Cute. Teague's worth a lot. YOUR front office is looking to trade Sanders. Both Sanders and Henson are limited (Sanders' lack of bulk and offense - Henson's severe lack of bulk) and may never become more than they are now.

dude, go crawl back in your hole.

[parson]

dude, go crawl back in your hole.

You turned aside to post this?

[parson]

Sorry, I'll come back later.

[hege53190]

New question: how about Sanders and Henson for Jeff Teague?

How about OJ Mayo for Al Horford and the Nets #1

Cute. Teague's worth a lot. YOUR front office is looking to trade Sanders. Both Sanders and Henson are limited (Sanders' lack of bulk and offense - Henson's severe lack of bulk) and may never become more than they are now.

No they aren't. Just because some crackpot "journalist" said that the bucks might move Sanders doesn't mean squat. Both Sanders and Henson have more trade value than Teague. The fact you think you can get both or the Bucks would trade both is ridiculous.

THE ONLY REASON that the Bucks would think about moving Sanders is because they have Henson. Moving Henson really defeats the purpose of moving Sanders and vice versa. Moving both for a mid tier PG is a terrible win now trade that should get any GM fired for even thinking about it.

Seriously my trade has about as much thought behind it as yours does.

[ackypoo]

Sorry, I'll come back later.

if you want to be reasonable fine, stick around. if youre just gonna post bs offers take it somewhere else.

[hege53190]

BTW- Having terrible east fans throw eastern conference adjectives in front of things is getting really annoying.

Eastern conference all-star.


A Detroit fan was bragging the other day that they were 5th place in the east and that Jennings is finally on a good team. I had to remind him that they were under .500 and they hadn't beat a decent team yet just like Jennings Bucks teams.

Yes, Teague might be an all-star but if you combined all the teams talent in the east besides Indiana and Miami, you would have a very difficult time fielding a team that could win a playoff series in the West.

Congrats. You have an all-star in the east.