ImageImageImageImageImage

Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

IS IT TIME TO FIRE ERNIE GRUNFELD?

1) Yes, I believe it is time for EG to go now.
29
69%
2) Ted should let him go at the end of the season.
9
21%
3) No, Ted needs to give him more time..(DESPITE THE FACT ERNIE HAS BEEN GM SINCE 2003)
4
10%
 
Total votes: 42

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,479
And1: 22,904
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1381 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 6, 2014 5:25 pm

miller31time wrote:Our problem isn't offense or defense. It's talent.

I don't agree with this. We have no depth, and that's on Ernie, but our top 6 players are legitimately solid NBA players, all of whom could start on at least 1/4th of the teams in the league. And Booker is a legit rotation player who would get regular minutes almost anywhere. We also have a superstar who is probably among the top 15-20 players in the game.

The talent is here. When healthy, this team should be winning well more than half their games, particularly in the East. The problem is chemistry, effort, and the system. Wittman needs to be better. Teams have adjusted to our offense by chasing Beal and Webster off the 3-point line. Wittman needs to counter. If nothing else, he needs to try Ariza at the 4 to get better spacing.

I'm not letting EG off the hook though. He is responsible for the fact that our team collapses if any of the top 6 players get hurt. And he is also responsible for building a team based on a 30-year-old front court. We have no real reason for future optimism other than Wall - a player he acquired by being lucky enough to land the #1 overall pick.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,056
And1: 20,540
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1382 » by dckingsfan » Mon Jan 6, 2014 5:31 pm

verbal8 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Hmmm, not to many in EGs corner at this point...


Although if Ted is, it doesn't matter what the fans think :(


Someone should send him a link to this thread...
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1383 » by verbal8 » Mon Jan 6, 2014 5:35 pm

nate33 wrote:I'm not letting EG off the hook though. He is responsible for the fact that our team collapses if any of the top 6 players get hurt. And he is also responsible for building a team based on a 30-year-old front court. We have no real reason for future optimism other than Wall - a player he acquired by being lucky enough to land the #1 overall pick.


If we had Evan Turner or I would argue even Derrick Favors instead of Wall, things would look a lot worse.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1384 » by Nivek » Mon Jan 6, 2014 5:40 pm

nate33 wrote:
miller31time wrote:Our problem isn't offense or defense. It's talent.

I don't agree with this. We have no depth, and that's on Ernie, but our top 6 players are legitimately solid NBA players, all of whom could start on at least 1/4th of the teams in the league. And Booker is a legit rotation player who would get regular minutes almost anywhere. We also have a superstar who is probably among the top 15-20 players in the game.

The talent is here. When healthy, this team should be winning well more than half their games, particularly in the East. The problem is chemistry, effort, and the system. Wittman needs to be better. Teams have adjusted to our offense by chasing Beal and Webster off the 3-point line. Wittman needs to counter. If nothing else, he needs to try Ariza at the 4 to get better spacing.

I'm not letting EG off the hook though. He is responsible for the fact that our team collapses if any of the top 6 players get hurt. And he is also responsible for building a team based on a 30-year-old front court. We have no real reason for future optimism other than Wall - a player he acquired by being lucky enough to land the #1 overall pick.


I agree that the top 6 is NBA quality -- that 6 being Wall, Ariza, Gortat, Nene, Booker and Webster. Beal isn't there yet.

In terms of ABILITY, I'd agree that Wall is a top 15-20 player in the game. In terms of production -- no. Not consistently. At least not yet.

Grunfeld has handcuffed Wittman with a 6-deep roster -- maybe 7 if they can get Beal producing like he did in the 2nd half of last season. And with guys on minute restrictions...Wittman has very few options.

What's frustrating is how predictable this was.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,479
And1: 22,904
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1385 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 6, 2014 5:40 pm

I'm not giving EG any credit for Wall. He was the clear consensus #1 pick. Everybody, and I mean everybody, knew Wall was going 1st. There may have been some mention of Turner going #1 by reporters trying to add intrigue to the draft, but nobody believed it.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,056
And1: 20,540
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1386 » by dckingsfan » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:00 pm

Nivek wrote:
nate33 wrote:
miller31time wrote:Our problem isn't offense or defense. It's talent.

I don't agree with this. We have no depth, and that's on Ernie, but our top 6 players are legitimately solid NBA players, all of whom could start on at least 1/4th of the teams in the league. And Booker is a legit rotation player who would get regular minutes almost anywhere. We also have a superstar who is probably among the top 15-20 players in the game.

The talent is here. When healthy, this team should be winning well more than half their games, particularly in the East. The problem is chemistry, effort, and the system. Wittman needs to be better. Teams have adjusted to our offense by chasing Beal and Webster off the 3-point line. Wittman needs to counter. If nothing else, he needs to try Ariza at the 4 to get better spacing.

I'm not letting EG off the hook though. He is responsible for the fact that our team collapses if any of the top 6 players get hurt. And he is also responsible for building a team based on a 30-year-old front court. We have no real reason for future optimism other than Wall - a player he acquired by being lucky enough to land the #1 overall pick.


I agree that the top 6 is NBA quality -- that 6 being Wall, Ariza, Gortat, Nene, Booker and Webster. Beal isn't there yet.

In terms of ABILITY, I'd agree that Wall is a top 15-20 player in the game. In terms of production -- no. Not consistently. At least not yet.

Grunfeld has handcuffed Wittman with a 6-deep roster -- maybe 7 if they can get Beal producing like he did in the 2nd half of last season. And with guys on minute restrictions...Wittman has very few options.

What's frustrating is how predictable this was.


Dead-on - Cosign this most powerful post. This should go into the GM101 handbook of how a GM can put a coach out to dry.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,076
And1: 4,759
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1387 » by Zonkerbl » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:18 pm

Yeah, our defense has deteriorated because we traded Okafor for Gortat. We can wish to be as good defensively as we were last year but it's just not going to happen.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1388 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:26 pm

Zonkerbl wrote:Yeah, our defense has deteriorated because we traded Okafor for Gortat. We can wish to be as good defensively as we were last year but it's just not going to happen.


Okafor's contributon to last year's team was underrated---because the team's W-L record was so bad.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1389 » by Ruzious » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:34 pm

I think Randy's going to get the axe soon, but EG is going to be around at least till the end of the season. It's the bed Ted's made. Firing EG would be like firing an extension of himself.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,076
And1: 4,759
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1390 » by Zonkerbl » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:42 pm

It's NBA talent but it is it home court advantage in the playoffs talent? Is it championship level talent?

If you were to put Wall, Beal, Ariza, Nene, and Gortat, with Webster and Porter, through the various statistical meatgrinders I think you'd find they have a maximum achievable output of 50 wins.

Which would be great. Maybe I'm greedy but I think we should be getting 50 wins now instead of lingering south of .500.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1391 » by Dat2U » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:48 pm

DCZards wrote:
Zonkerbl wrote:Yeah, our defense has deteriorated because we traded Okafor for Gortat. We can wish to be as good defensively as we were last year but it's just not going to happen.


Okafor's contributon to last year's team was underrated---because the team's W-L record was so bad.


Maybe that's why you don't trade cap room away to pay Okafor & Ariza $20 mil per... So you can have enough cap room to fill out an actual roster instead of being 6 deep with a lousy record because we have 9 **** guys on the roster that can't play.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,380
And1: 6,762
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1392 » by TGW » Mon Jan 6, 2014 6:55 pm

Nate--I disagree that talent is not an issue...it absolutely is. Talent is the reason why the top 7 players on the team are gassed from too many minutes and are on minutes restriction. Talent is why we had to move Nene to the bench, and Beal missed games. Talent is why we can't defend anyone.

More than half the roster stinks. That's a talent issue.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1393 » by JonathanJoseph » Mon Jan 6, 2014 7:37 pm

nate33 wrote:I'm really starting to hate this team. Well, not the players specifically, but the way the Washington Wizards are run. There really is no hope in sight. We suck. We have always sucked. We always will suck.


A fish always rots at the head. EG is still calling the shots, and Ted continues to let EG call the shots.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1394 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 6, 2014 7:58 pm

Dat2U wrote:
DCZards wrote:Okafor's contributon to last year's team was underrated---because the team's W-L record was so bad.


Maybe that's why you don't trade cap room away to pay Okafor & Ariza $20 mil per... So you can have enough cap room to fill out an actual roster instead of being 6 deep with a lousy record because we have 9 **** guys on the roster that can't play.


I see we still disagree on the merits of the Okafor/Ariza trade. I'm shocked! :)
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1395 » by Dat2U » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:00 pm

DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
DCZards wrote:Okafor's contributon to last year's team was underrated---because the team's W-L record was so bad.


Maybe that's why you don't trade cap room away to pay Okafor & Ariza $20 mil per... So you can have enough cap room to fill out an actual roster instead of being 6 deep with a lousy record because we have 9 **** guys on the roster that can't play.


I see we still disagree on the merits of the Okafor/Ariza trade. I'm shocked! :)


Wow, you don't have an argument to stand on, I'm shocked! :lol:
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,157
And1: 5,006
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1396 » by DCZards » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:14 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Wow, you don't have an argument to stand on, I'm shocked! :lol:


Now, what makes you think I would waste my time arguing with you about the Okafor/Ariza trade. Been there, done that.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,380
And1: 6,762
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1397 » by TGW » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:16 pm

I'm still waiting to see the benefits of the Okariza trade. I want to see all the "professionalism" they brought actually translate into you know....wins. From what I'm seeing, I still see no development from the players that were supposed to improve and benefit from said "professionalism."

How about getting good players instead of "professional" players. Maybe that might help a little more than the influx of broken down unwanted veterans.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1398 » by jivelikenice » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:18 pm

TGW wrote:Nate--I disagree that talent is not an issue...it absolutely is. Talent is the reason why the top 7 players on the team are gassed from too many minutes and are on minutes restriction. Talent is why we had to move Nene to the bench, and Beal missed games. Talent is why we can't defend anyone.

More than half the roster stinks. That's a talent issue.


Talent behind the top 6 is an issue but Wittman is definitely not maximizing the talent he has. We have nothing reesembling a halfcourt offense, we ball watch & constantly let good shooters get uncontested shots, we trap unecessarily, and we come out with energy & focus maybe 50% of the time. Wittman's only answer seems to be gamble to create turnovers and run. We're flawed but it doesn't help when you're playing from behind nightly based on coaching incompetence.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,380
And1: 6,762
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1399 » by TGW » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:22 pm

jivelikenice wrote:
TGW wrote:Nate--I disagree that talent is not an issue...it absolutely is. Talent is the reason why the top 7 players on the team are gassed from too many minutes and are on minutes restriction. Talent is why we had to move Nene to the bench, and Beal missed games. Talent is why we can't defend anyone.

More than half the roster stinks. That's a talent issue.


Talent behind the top 6 is an issue but Wittman is definitely not maximizing the talent he has. We have nothing reesembling a halfcourt offense, we ball watch & constantly let good shooters get uncontested shots, we trap unecessarily, and we come out with energy & focus maybe 50% of the time. Wittman's only answer seems to be gamble to create turnovers and run. We're flawed but it doesn't help when you're playing from behind nightly based on coaching incompetence.


I don't disagree with you, but I think they current cast doesn't fit Whitman's style of play. He wants more of a defensive, half-court oriented team. What he has is a fast-break point guard and no rim protectors. The coaching style and the roster don't fit each other at all.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Countdown to Ernie Grunfeld Firing 

Post#1400 » by Dat2U » Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:38 pm

DCZards wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
Wow, you don't have an argument to stand on, I'm shocked! :lol:


Now, what makes you think I would waste my time arguing with you about the Okafor/Ariza trade. Been there, done that.


You don't have an argument to stand on. Simple as that.

Return to Washington Wizards