nevetsov wrote:Los Soles wrote:Frye is best as a FIVE.
See: '09-'10. In particular, remember this lineup?
Dragic-Barbosa-Dudley-Lou-Frye
Mismatches galore on offense, and SUPERB on D. Including against elite teams/players/units in the playoffs.
I always considered Lou as the FIVE in that lineup because he was the "one in" of the 4out-1in lineup.
I don't think the position labels are really that important, as long as you have frye out there with an active, athletic big with good D and good hands. This could be Lou, Plumlee... Whoever.
Ok, you're right, the position labels are arbitrary. Frye plays pretty much the same role regardless of who his frontcourt mate is. On OFFENSE. But on defense, Frye was the five beside
Lou/
Amare, but he was the 4 beside
Gortat/
Lopez and now
Plumlee.
For example, in a 2-3 zone, where does he stand? In the 2010 playoffs, he was in the middle of the of the zone that gave the Lakers fits. Lou-Frye lineups DESTROYED Bynum lineups. Frye-Gortat in a 2-3 zone the next season? Gortat takes the middle, and it doesn't work at all: Frye isn't quick enough to both defend the 3 and help inside like Lou was.
So regardless of position, the big question is: do you pair Frye with
QUICKNESS or
SIZE?
I vote quickness. Which is why, as I've said for years, I still think we should be looking for Lou 2.0, in the form of...
Lou
Thaddeus Young
Faried
Chris Andersen
Amir Johnson
(etc.)
And now we find out that Thad is available. He's dramatically improved his 3-point shooting and other areas of his offensive game, and his advanced stats are consistently positive on both sides of the ball.