PC Board All-Time Fantasy League Project - Discussion Thread

MisterHibachi · Post #461 » by **MisterHibachi** » Thu Jan 9, 2014 11:22 pm

Quotatious wrote:
Notanoob wrote:I'm curious at to who you'll target for SF if you have Matrix at PF, MisterHibachi. Most of the remaining guys are post-up, scoring SFs from the eighties, unless you're going for a total non-star. At least, ones that I can think of.

I assume Hibachi would like to take a good shooter right now. I know I'm targeting SF shooter myself though.

Yeah I need a shooter. Not necessarily a small forward tho

Notanoob · Post #462 » by **Notanoob** » Thu Jan 9, 2014 11:37 pm

Quotatious wrote:You would love to nab Chauncey, wouldn't you? There's one guy very similar to him though, two decades prior.
Guards shouldn't be a problem though. With that frontcourt, you won't need that much talent in the backcourt to do alright.

Chauncey is exactly who I wanted, especially being a Pistons fan. I was stunned to see him go so high, but he's a guy who could fit in anywhere, and was solid in all aspects of the game, so it should be no surprise that he's more valuable in this game. But an 80's guard who fits Chauncey's mold, huh? Presumable a champion himself? I'll be doing some research then.

Now that I've thought about it, I figured who would probably work out for MisterHibachi. I'll be interested to see if I'm correct in who he's targeting.

MisterHibachi · Post #463 » by **MisterHibachi** » Thu Jan 9, 2014 11:47 pm

Notanoob wrote:Now that I've thought about it, I figured who would probably work out for MisterHibachi. I'll be interested to see if I'm correct in who he's targeting.

There's a few ways I can go. Hopefully I can go with my first choice, but it's looking unlikely really.

bbms · Post #464 » by **bbms** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:01 am

With two picks i already knew ardee was a lock for the best offense. Let's wait to see if it confirms. I like Bruh Man's core too, two all-time level defensive players and both excellent playmakers, with one of the greatest off ball scorer. O_6 has the most balanced team imo, DHodgkins has a heck of a balanced team too. whitehops team would be fun to watch. Would love to see ThunderDan9 team play too.

Notanoob · Post #465 » by **Notanoob** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:05 am

We're doing 3 year peaks, and the player has to have played at least 75% of the games in each individual season. Walton doesn't have 3 straight years that qualify unfortunately.

MisterHibachi · Post #466 » by **MisterHibachi** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:06 am

Walton never played 62+ games 3 years in a row.

bbms · Post #467 » by **bbms** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:08 am

Yeah, got it, also, Walton's prime was in the 70's, and its 80's+ only.

Post #468 » by **Quotatious** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:08 am

bbms wrote:Surprised Bill Walton is still up for grabs.

Walton isn't eligible for this draft. He never played enough games to qualify by the criteria we're using.

Notanoob wrote:Chauncey is exactly who I wanted, especially being a Pistons fan. I was stunned to see him go so high, but he's a guy who could fit in anywhere, and was solid in all aspects of the game, so it should be no surprise that he's more valuable in this game.

Yeah, Chauncey was a very versatile player in his prime (both him and Kobe had excellent post game, good luck putting smaller defenders on them

), and I think really highly of him. Very high bball IQ guy, very competitive and reliable in the crunch time. He could play very well off the ball so he's a great fit next to Kobe.

Notanoob wrote:But an 80's guard who fits Chauncey's mold, huh? Presumable a champion himself? I'll be doing some research then.

No, not a champion, but came pretty close to it a couple times. He was at his best in the early 90s.
Well, enough with the hints, you're my opponent after all. :lol:

MisterHibachi · Post #469 » by **MisterHibachi** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:10 am

Quotatious wrote:No, not a champion, but came pretty close to it a couple times. He was at his best in the early 90s.

That's the guy I'm after.

Post #470 » by **Quotatious** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:13 am

MisterHibachi wrote:That's the guy I'm after.

Oh, so it seems that Notanoob will remain with his hands empty because you have your pick before him. :lol:

BTW. Hibachi, something bad happened to our avatars. :lol:

MisterHibachi · Post #471 » by **MisterHibachi** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:18 am

Quotatious wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:That's the guy I'm after.

Oh, so it seems that Notanoob will remain with his hands empty because you have your pick before him.

BTW. Hibachi, something bad happened to our avatars.

I probably won't get him either. 3 out of 4 guys before me would have a need for him.

I have no idea what happened to my avatar lol, pic deleted :-?

Post #472 » by **Quotatious** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:25 am

MisterHibachi wrote:I have no idea what happened to my avatar lol, pic deleted

Mine is a lot worse. :lol:

At first, my pic was also deleted, but right now that's an ass right there...I have no idea where it came from, LMAO.

MisterHibachi · Post #473 » by **MisterHibachi** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:30 am

Quotatious wrote:
MisterHibachi wrote:I have no idea what happened to my avatar lol, pic deleted

Mine is a lot worse. At first, my pic was also deleted, but right now that's an ass right there...I have no idea where it came from, LMAO.

An ass? I didn't see that. Avatars are back now tho

Edit: hahaha I see the ass

Edit#2: it keeps changing :-o

john248 · Post #474 » by **john248** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:34 am

Quotatious wrote:No, not a champion, but came pretty close to it a couple times. He was at his best in the early 90s.
Well, enough with the hints, you're my opponent after all.

You may as well just say the name at this point...

Post #475 » by **Quotatious** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:35 am

Alright, edited. Mr. William Russell.

John248 - as you've probably seen, Hibachi was already considering him before I even mentioned anything in my post, so it wouldn't change anything.

john248 · Post #476 » by **john248** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:37 am

Quotatious wrote:Alright, edited. Mr. William Russell.

John248 - as you've probably seen, Hibachi was already considering him before I even mentioned anything in my post, so it wouldn't change anything.

I just skip to the last page of most threads I visit if they move to fast. lol

Notanoob · Post #477 » by **Notanoob** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:51 am

Quotatious wrote:No, not a champion, but came pretty close to it a couple times. He was at his best in the early 90s.
Well, enough with the hints, you're my opponent after all.

Hmmm...There are a lot of solid PGs who peaked in the early 90's, but one who could shoot 3's and was happy to play off-ball though? AND play defense?

I wish I could name guys, but I don't know if there is a perfect fit. I think I'm going to go with a poor man's Steve Nash (no, not the guy who's always getting compared to him, different one).

Unless you mean a guy me and Hibachi were talking about, who has no chance of falling to my next pick.

ardee · Post #478 » by **ardee** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:16 am

MisterHibachi wrote:
Quotatious wrote:No, not a champion, but came pretty close to it a couple times. He was at his best in the early 90s.

That's the guy I'm after.

I LITERALLY was just scouting this guy on bball-reference and youtube hahaha :lol:

I know he probably won't fall that low though, no matter, I know who I'm taking :wink:

ardee · Post #479 » by **ardee** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:17 am

NOOOOO I wanted Manu

ThunderDan... I beg you.... Treat him well. He's a good man, he deserves a good life.

Post #480 » by **Quotatious** » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:26 am

ardee wrote:I LITERALLY was just scouting this guy on bball-reference and youtube hahaha

I know he probably won't fall that low though, no matter, I know who I'm taking

It'd be pretty funny if it isn't the same guy. :lol:

Anyway, there are still a lot of great point guards and small forwards still left to be taken. Centers are very limited, so I'm glad I got a superstar talent at the most important position in basketball. Shooting guards are also lacking, but there is still plenty of great offensive SFs left.